Preview

Capital Punishment - a Necessary Evil?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
910 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Capital Punishment - a Necessary Evil?
Capital Punishment - a necessary evil?
View PDF | Print View by: Smrithy
Word Count: 933
0 comments

“An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth and a life for a life”

Is it ever justifiable to execute criminals?

Is Capital punishment the penalty (sentence of death) for committing a crime or is execution in the simplest of terms a state-sanctioned killing?
The principle of capital punishment is that certain murderers deserve nothing less than death as a just, proportionate and effective punishment. On the other hand, it devalues the respect we place on human life; a vilification of human rights - saying that killing is wrong when we sanction killing criminals?
The Nithari killings of Noida are still afresh in the minds of every Indian. In an incident like the Nithari case, any punishment seems too little compared to the barbaric inhuman crime committed on innocent children and women. It only seems justified that the guilty should be given rigorous punishment which will be a lesson for future; a lesson such that nobody ever dare commit such heinous crimes - ever. Protestors of the crime demanded capital punishment for Moninder and Surender- the two prime accused.
Is capital punishment justified in this case?

If someone doesn’t respect another person’s right to live, it means that he has just lost his right to live.

The argument seems fairly just till the issue of human judgement rears its ugly head.

The Supreme Court of India states that the death penalty is to be awarded only in the rarest case of exceptional depravity and brutality. But is human judgment, as several recent court cases have revealed, totally subjective?

-Recently, the Delhi High Court pronounced the death penalty on Santosh Kumar Singh for the murder of Priyadarshini Mattoo. The trial court had acquitted Singh.

-In the Parliament attack case, along with Mohammad Afzal, S A R Geelani was sentenced to death by the trial court. The Delhi High Court acquitted Geelani, as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Certain states still allow the death penalty as an option for punishing criminals. This eye for an eye punishment has been a controversy for many years. Deciding whether or not it is morally right to take a person’s life because they took another’s life is the main issue still up for debate. The death penalty is a punishment that the court is unable to take back. In the event that the jury and judge were wrong in their decision, deciding to take falsely accused individual’s life by giving such an extreme punishment can cause a huge controversy across the nation. Therefore, the death penalty should not be an option for deciding how to accurately punish an individual.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the death penalty is a form of revenge which is an outdated method for justice in our society today. Using this method of an eye for an eye type of punishment is the inhumanely killing of a person. As said by Ghandi, "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" meaning revenge or retribution is not the answer you should seek when punishing someone. This form of punishment has been used since ancient times and is so severe that it can not be reversed. The permanence of this punishment is unsparing and does not give the person any chances to be rehabilitated or try to be integrated back into society. The very worst means of torture or disciplinary action is to take a person’s life. The whole purpose of our justice system is to impede criminals from committing crime by the means of punishment that…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Capital punishment has been the center of much controversy dating back to its origins. Although the roots of capital punishment can be traced as far back as 1697 BC, arguments over its effectiveness and morality continue in the midst of its existence today. There are many people who have come up with reasonable arguments for both sides of the issue. Most people who believe that the death penalty is a fair punishment use the argument, "lex talionis", meaning, "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, an arm for an arm, a life for a life." (Hooker, 1996, p.34). Although in today 's modern society many countries have now opted to declare capital punishment obsolete, some areas still feel that keeping the penalty instated is…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Life Without Parole

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capital punishment is murder. It really doesn 't matter how you look at it. The end result is still the same. "What is the difference between the state killing and an individual killing" (Moral Arguments 1). It adds up to be the same end result. It is "one more dead body, one more set of grieving parents, and one more cemetery slot. When we execute someone, we are sending a profound message of cynicism" about the value of human life (Moral Arguments 2). "Every time we execute someone," we are sinking to the same level as the killer (Moral…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment is viewed as a political viewpoint that has pro’s and con’s by the American people. Capital punishment is known as the “The Death Penalty” and is identified as the premeditated and planned taking of a human life. The government views this as a response to a crime committed by a legally convicted person. The question is The Death Penalty just and applied fairly? The argument against Capital punishment can include the following; Amnesty International, who believes that “The Death Penalty” is the cruelest denial of human, rights (White, 2009). The pro’s state that, “Capital punishment gives society the right and duty to protect the innocent in self-defense.” The Death Penalty gives closure to the victim’s families who have suffered so much. Some families may never recover from the cruelty of the crime, and most families just want closure. Most Americans and people from different countries such as; china, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan agree with capital punishment. White stated, “I believe that it sends the wrong message: Killing people who kill people to show killing is wrong (White, 2009). Therefore, is it just and applied fairly is the question that is asked, should we kill because some kill? I believe that we are sending a message to promote killing, is it fair for some and not for others.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital Punishment is a moral controversy in today’s society. It is the judicial execution of criminals judged guilty of capital offenses by the state, or in other words, the death penalty. The first established death penalty laws can date back to the Eighteenth Century B.C. and the ethical debates towards this issue have existed just as long. There is a constant pro-con debate about this issue, and philosophers like Aristotle and Mill have their own take on this controversy as well. Aristotle is against capital punishment, while Mill believes it is morally permissible.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Does killing ever justify murder? Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the act of killing criminals for heinous acts that they’ve committed, generally homicide. I believe that capital punishment is a social injustice because it is unconstitutional and unethical. Those against capital punishment question the surety of the offender’s guilt, economic costs, and the supposedly unbiased judges. There are two sides to every coin though, and there are many reasons to support capital punishment as well. Those who agree with capital punishment argue that it dissuades others from attempting similar crimes and is a fair retribution for lives lost. Of all the varied topics included when discussing capital punishment, one of the most frightening to think about is the possibility that the wrong man may have died.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The most severe form of punishment of all legal sentences is that of death. This is referred to as the death penalty, or capital punishment; this is the most severe form of corporal punishment, requiring law enforcement officers to actually kill the offenders. It has been banned in numerous countries, in the United States, however an earlier move to eliminate capital punishment has now been reserved and more and more states are resorting to capital punishment for such serious offenders namely murder. "Lex talionis," mentioned by the Bible encourages "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" mentality, and people have been using it regularly for centuries. We use it in reference to burglary, adultery, and various other situations, although, some people enforce it on a different level, some people use it in reference to death. An individual may steal from those who have stolen from him, or an individual wrongs those who have wronged him, but should an individual have the right to kill to seek retaliation? Four issues are on the hot topic in the United States, stirring up America's feeling towards this issue. There is controversy debating capital punishment today and whether or not it works, or if it is morally right. We have a certain privilege in our own lives, but should the lives of others belong to us as well? Do we have the right to decide on the lives of others; of people we may not even know? If we find someone guilty of murder, we sentence him to death. This makes us murders ourselves, but is there possibility in justifying these acts? Those who assist in the death penalty; are they not partners in crime? Is death penalty a cruel and unusual punishment or is it now just a necessary tool in the war on crime?…

    • 2731 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his essay Death and Justice, Edward Koch argues in support of capital punishment, he believes it is just and it saves lives. He successfully delivers an argument laced with true and vivid examples of unforgettable murderous events. His intended audience consists of the opposing voters and readers of the New Republic, the political magazine that published his essay. Prior to reading Edward Koch’s essay I was sure that I would disagree but it became clear to me that he is right. There are seven commonly held views against the death penalty that Koch argues against in his essay. In what follows I discuss a few of his arguments and show that the death penalty is the most viable approach to deal with convicted murderers.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the death penalty affects both the individual and society at large, decisions imposing such punishments should take all factors into consideration. Some people say that, the possibility that innocent men and women may be put to death. “While there are many reasons to turn off the machinery of death, perhaps the most compelling is the ever-present possibility of executing innocent people.” (Thomson, 2006). In fact sometimes the court can pass the wrong judgment to the wrong person. In the case of a death penalty judgment, there is no going back once the sentence has been stated.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The death penalty is an extremely controversial topic that is developing within our society today. According to Andre and Velasquez in “Capital Punishment: Our Duty or Our Doom,” 2000 people in the United States are currently awaiting capital punishment due to atrocious crimes (Andre and Velasquez 2013). This issue is becoming more controversial as more states are beginning to consider ratifying this concept states Andre and Velasquez (Andre and Velasquez 2013). The reason this issue is becoming more controversial is due to the fact that this punishment is at the peak of severity. Capital punishment is the legal process for a court to deem death upon an individual due to the severity of the crimes committed. These crimes can range anywhere from murder, to treason under certain circumstances. Sociologically, numerous activist groups due to the fact of the extreme controversy of the task at hand are questioning this issue. Does living in a free country necessarily give the courts the right to take a person’s life just due to the crimes, or is another punishment necessarily acceptable in certain circumstances? Does a judge, or any person for that matter, have the rights to sentence a person to death? Andre and Velasquez state that morally, the death penalty is wrong on the basis that society has a moral obligation to save as many lives as possible, not take them (Andre and Velasquez 2013). Andre and Velasquez further state that there is no supporting evidence to say that another punishment has a stronger effect then let’s say death (Andre and Velasquez 2013). The death penalty is an extremely controversial topic due to the severity of the punishment; however, certain measure must be understood to fully implicate the reasons for the establishment of this punishment within our society today.…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As mentioned before, the issue of capital punishment has been debated increasingly over the past few decades. The question of whether or not it is humane and should be allowed is still not answered. One of the reasons it is being pursued is the belief in the fact “lex talionis”, Latin for “an eye for an eye”. People believe, and I agree, that a person should pay for his or her felonies. The idea that a person who has committed murder be pardoned is just not plausible. What will stop the person from repeating this act? People believe that the presence of the death penalty will keep criminals from acting in the first place due to the fear of death. Death penalty is also considered more humane than life imprisonment since it is quicker and less agonizing. It is also considered more economical since executions cost less than supporting a prisoner under a life sentence, which can cost up to $22,000 a year per prisoner. It is thought that this money could be put to better use than to feed a prisoner serving for life.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every other day various methods of legally killing people by hanging or electrocuting, beheading or stoning is used hay Government to remove them or put them to death for different reasons It should be abolished as this capital punishment is brutal, cruel against humanity the one which degrades a person is not civilized, barbaric and is also a corrupt practice, at times even political interference. It is totally against the rights that are fundamentally given by the Constitution that is right to life which is universally accepted. Every human being has inherent right to protection of human life. There should be unconditional abolition of capital punishment. The death penalty has always the possibility of mistake or error; there are many instances of conviction where innocent people are put to death. Capital Punishment gives inspiration to the wrongdoers to become brutal leading to increase in such acts of violence instead of discouraging. Capital Punishment is full of corruption and…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) Innocence List (2015), during the period 1973 to June, 2015 there has been 155 exonerations due to acquittal, pardons, and charges being dropped. This seem to indicate that there is no absolute guarantee that a guilty verdict means a guilty individual therefore and absolute sentence of death seem unjust.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The absolute consequence of that “evil” is your actions in return inflicted on you (541). Therefore, preservationists of the death penalty feel that the “eye for an eye” concept is healthy for society. The philosophy an “eye for an eye” is a school playground tactic, not a justifiable means of punishment we project in the death penalty for moral…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays