Preview

Capital Punishment Should Be Abolished in Malaysia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
891 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Capital Punishment Should Be Abolished in Malaysia
Capital punishment is a death sentence awarded for capital offences where in the criminal provisions consider such persons as a gross danger or threats to the existence of the society. As the merge of human rights associations, this punishment is strictly opposed for its cruelty and this has been a global debate for some years. In Malaysia, this punishment is proudly held in the law and until today, executions are being held. It is a great shame as all members of the United Nation were already called to join the moratorium of death penalty (Amnesty International, 2007). Many countries have abandoned capital punishment and Malaysia should do the same as it is inappropriate, cruel and it does not help the society in any ways.

It is inappropriate for today as clearly, it is incongruent with what Malaysia is aiming for. The aim is to be a fully developed country and to be one Malaysia has to fulfil all challenges which one of it is to be a fully caring society (Razak, 2010). Putting an end to one’s life does not define “caring” at all. Even though the punishment has been practised in almost every society, many have abandoned the punishment and more are in favour of abolishing it (Caroline Sculier, 2010). If the policy is as such, then the government is at the same footing as the murderers (Stevenson, 1993). As death penalty is final, those criminals will also be deprived from the opportunity to change and the true causes of crimes will not be figured out (Joseph A. Melusky, 2003). Thus, when justice is hurried, justice is buried too. This clearly shows that we have no mercy and for a society that values human rights, justice and mercy, there should be no death penalty at all (Ragunath Kesavan, 2010).

To punish does not mean having to do it cruelly. The world has decides that death penalty is inhuman and degrading punishment which also constitutes a torture (Caroline Sculier, 2010). Inevitably, there are risks in executing innocent people such as cases of drug

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Certain states still allow the death penalty as an option for punishing criminals. This eye for an eye punishment has been a controversy for many years. Deciding whether or not it is morally right to take a person’s life because they took another’s life is the main issue still up for debate. The death penalty is a punishment that the court is unable to take back. In the event that the jury and judge were wrong in their decision, deciding to take falsely accused individual’s life by giving such an extreme punishment can cause a huge controversy across the nation. Therefore, the death penalty should not be an option for deciding how to accurately punish an individual.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This documentation continues by adding, that all humans shall be treated with dignity, respect and refrain from cruel punishment. It is for this reason, many see the death penalty as an immoral and unnatural act against human beings. Government officials stand firm to the belief that the death penalty deters the number of criminal. However, due to an absence of scientific and literary reports these findings are false. According to research, the death penalty has little to no effect on the solution to those convicted of violent crimes (Capital Punishment, 2011).…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is a punishment that results in death usually caused by capital crimes or capital offenses. It is commonly referred to as the death sentence. According to an article “Buzzle” not all countries accept capital punishment but there are still a lot of states who do (par.1). Capital punishment has been around for thousands of years, this punishment is said to have helped keep crime level down and alter the minds of future criminals to prevent them from committing atrocious crimes such as: murder, terrorism, and in some situations aggravated kidnapping.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the death penalty is a form of revenge which is an outdated method for justice in our society today. Using this method of an eye for an eye type of punishment is the inhumanely killing of a person. As said by Ghandi, "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" meaning revenge or retribution is not the answer you should seek when punishing someone. This form of punishment has been used since ancient times and is so severe that it can not be reversed. The permanence of this punishment is unsparing and does not give the person any chances to be rehabilitated or try to be integrated back into society. The very worst means of torture or disciplinary action is to take a person’s life. The whole purpose of our justice system is to impede criminals from committing crime by the means of punishment that…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is a waste of money, time and space. The death penalty simply confuses the community and blurs the line between right and wrong, since you are hypocritically punishing someone for killing another human, by in return killing them also. The death penalty isn’t decreasing the murders so why re-instate it? Imagine the affect on young children when they find out what happens to hazardous criminals, it would ruin the child’s innocence. They death penalty bring nothing but suffering to the family of the criminal, and a negative atmosphere throughout the community. If it were your child on death row wouldn’t you want them to have a second chance? Once again, I state with utmost important, the death penalty should remain as a figure of the past and we should remain civilised and keep our-self and community away from this inhumane act as long as…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Valbhav Goel, explores the issue of capital punishment through the lens of human rights law and a sociological context. Goel goes on to examine the very nature of capital punishment and explores the barbaric and unethical component attached to the practice. He does so while incorporating the debate of proponents and critics of the death penalty and also looks at trends developing in the past decade in terms of utilization of the death penalty. Goel also explores famous uses of the death penalty such as the Sadaam Hussein execution and whether certain individuals merit the use of capital punishment. This paper can help me establish trends taking place on a global scale with regards to capital punishment while also exploring the legal analysis of the issue of capital punishment and whether it contravenes human rights law as well as international law.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment has been used around the world for many thousands of years as a way of enforcing justice when someone has done wrong by what standards that the cultures have. Over the past few centuries capital punishment has started to be questioned by many people in Europe and in the United States. Many people who support the death penalty cite reasons such as deterrence and not wanting to spend money a person who will never be a productive member of society again. Many who are in opposition to the death penalty say that the death penalty is killing innocent people and is actually not saving any money at all and that it is in fact costing too much and that it is wrong to simply kill someone who commits a crime. There are also questions to the fairness of the death penalty and many who question if it is being applied fairly. Both sides of the debate over the morality and legitimacy of capital punishment will be presented in this paper with this author taking one side. While the thought of having someone put to death is not something that anyone would like, the death penalty is the only way for ultimate justice to be administered for victims provided that it is fairly administered.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capital punishment is the ultimate sentence administered by the government for committing dangerous offenses. The word “capital” derives from the Latin word “capitalis,” meaning “of the head.” Original instances of capital punishment included beheading and hanging, leading to the use of word “capital” today. Through history, communities have considered some types of crimes so terrifying that the death penalty has been enacted for them. Over time, changing moralistic values and notions on government authority have limited the number and sorts of crimes considered worthy of death. Many countries have eliminated capital punishment totally, dismissing it as an inhumane reaction to criminal…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty or in other words capital punishment is a form of execution used for a long time. It is a form of punishment that was and still is used by several countries for various types of crimes for hundreds of years. However the death penalty has become a very debatable and confronting issue for last decades due to the fact of people having different opinions on this issue. In some countries it is considered to be a part of the judicial system, while in other countries it is considered to be an act violating human rights. During the first decade of 21st century, about two thirds of world vide countries have abolished the capital punishment due to the fact it is a violation of moral codex and human rights. There are always pros and cons to every action humans are able to do, so it is with the issue of death penalty. Countries such as China, USA, Japan or India have still retained to the execution of criminals by death penalty. However there are many intergovernmental and human rights organization such as the European Union that understands the death penalty to be one of the most pressing human rights issues of all time. (Babcock S., 2007) People are questioning the courts if death penalty really deters the crime, or if it is just a need to satisfy society’s desire for revenge. We can find many arguments against it; however the answer to question of abolishing the death penalty by the entire world is unclear and in far future. China is the country known for using many forms of inhuman punishment methods. There can be find an evidence showing the China to be the country with the highest execution case rate. I could not believe these statements, so I decide to search this issue and…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital punishment or death penalty is usually imposed on persons who committed heinous crimes and are those that endanger the safety of the society. Some countries and societies implement capital punishment while others do not. There are various reasons for this policy of countries, including the social view on the death penalty and the prevailing religious view in the society among others.…

    • 2469 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Death penalty is one the debatable topics throughout the world. There is a conflict between law and ethics. Public opinion does not coincide with the state opinion. There are 33 countries, which use death penalty as capital punishment. According to Amnesty International Report, in 2011, China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and USA topped the list. According to statistics, in USA 33 states use death penalty as capital punishment and other 17 does not. (Amnesty International, 2011) Death penalty’s primary goal is to make people think twice before doing crime. The Death penalty helps to decrease the murder’s rate, however it could violate human right.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humans are not perfect, humans are not always right, imperfect humans cannot give out perfect justice. As much as we may abhor another human beings action, is executing someone for killing someone else really the right thing to do? Two wrongs don’t make a right. When a country abolishes the death penalty it isn’t plunged into criminal chaos and countries that use the death penalty don’t have lower crime rates compared to those that do. The death penalty can kill the innocent and can target those with darker skin. The death penalty tortures and kills, no matter how heinous the crime no human deserves the death penalty. Is it paramount that Australia re-introduces the death penalty? Just because capital punishment is legal in other countries, it doesn’t mean that it should be here.…

    • 655 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty is viewed as barbaric and cruel by some, but to others it is just and fitting. For advocators of the death penalty, capital punishment falls in line with lex talionis, the law of retaliation, which consists of the “life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth…” mentality. If someone kills a person, they themselves should be killed. However, these feelings face a considerable amount of criticism and opposition. Many strong arguments are made by both sides on this controversial issue, but reasons which oppose the death penalty are more convincing to this author. The flaws of the legal systems application of capital punishment are, but not limited to, the fact that it is arbitrary, unfair, costs more once everything is taken into account, and does not act as a powerful deterrent of crime. For these reasons and more, the death penalty should be abolished from every country around the world.…

    • 2399 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every other day various methods of legally killing people by hanging or electrocuting, beheading or stoning is used hay Government to remove them or put them to death for different reasons It should be abolished as this capital punishment is brutal, cruel against humanity the one which degrades a person is not civilized, barbaric and is also a corrupt practice, at times even political interference. It is totally against the rights that are fundamentally given by the Constitution that is right to life which is universally accepted. Every human being has inherent right to protection of human life. There should be unconditional abolition of capital punishment. The death penalty has always the possibility of mistake or error; there are many instances of conviction where innocent people are put to death. Capital Punishment gives inspiration to the wrongdoers to become brutal leading to increase in such acts of violence instead of discouraging. Capital Punishment is full of corruption and…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is the gravest consequence for violating the criminal law which has been used for thousands of years and it dates back to Ancient Times. The first proof of capital punishment is from Hammurabi’s Code, where Hammurabi quoted: “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” (ca. 1700 B.C). Nowadays, death penalty is a very controversial topic with many pros and cons. It can be a strong example, a safe and cheaper way to treat murderers, but it can also be a wrongful solution.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays