Preview

Capital Punishment Is Always Wrong, Do You Agree?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
422 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Capital Punishment Is Always Wrong, Do You Agree?
Capital Punishment is always wrong, do you agree?
A Christian would agree as they believe all life is sacred and only god can choose when your life ends, he will punish you in hell for your sins and it is not the place of the government to decide whether you are killed or not. This is because in the bible it says “Do not kill” which is one of the Ten Commandments which are not to be disobeyed, they also believe in forgiveness and love which are the fundamentals of their religion therefore criminals should be forgiven and given a chance to change.
A Buddhist would agree because they believe in the sanctity of life. This is because they believe in karma - that you will accumulate bad karma for the bad things you do in your life and will pay for them in your next life and so therefore we should leave people to be punished in their next life and not kill them because all life is sacred and if we kill them we will accumulate bad karma.
A Muslim would disagree because they believe that punishment is needed to protect the welfare of society and serve justice to the victims family, they believe that if you take a life then you should die because you have taken away something sacred and sinned, this is because in the Qur’an it says “take not life, which God hath made sacred, except by way of justice and law” which permits the death penalty if it is to bring about justice.
Another Christian would disagree because they believe that god has appointed the king/queen who has then appointed the government to serve justice on his behalf, this means that they can punish people in the means they feel appropriate and in the bible there are examples where people were killed for their sins so therefore it must be alright to kill people in today’s society. This is because in the bible it says “show no pity, life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot” which shows that we should have no mercy and should give the same punishment as the crime done for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Some people might agree with the death penalty. Families get devastated when someone they love and care about has died. Its different when that person they care so much about has been murdered or killed. People tend to hate that person and have the urge to do just about anything to them in order for them to suffer, which causes us to take, revenge on them. This matter has lead to the death penalty. This is a punishment that slowly kills the man or woman that has committed the crime. Why should we have pity on those who choose to kill? If they felt powerful enough to kill, then we should be able to do the same to them. Whatever their reason is that they choose to kill they should be punished someway, somehow.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    much better way. Because we are made in the image of God we are commanded…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The act of killing is restricted by all religions. Religions possess that life is a gift from God and human beings are valuable. Islam totally opposes euthanasia. Furthermore, The Qur’an says that Allah created all life and everything belongs to him. In addition, Christianity also is against euthanasia. The arguments are usually based on the beliefs that life is given by God, and that human beings are made in God's image. However, some churches emphasize the significance of not being involved with the natural procedures of death. For instance, choosing the time and place of a person's death is God's decision. Yet, if doctors were to seek medical…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edward Byrn Analysis

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pope Francis, for example, has advocated for the banning of the death penalty regardless of how serious was the crime committed for the reason that it contradicts the plan of God. As a repercussion, a person who is responsible for deciding whether to legalize or illegalize such law and happened to be religious could be influenced by the Pope’s statement. This kind of notion, in my opinion, is utterly illogical and irrational. I do not believe that a murderer or a rapist, for example, deserves a second chance in life just because some people believe that even God would forgive such abominable sins. The main concern should be about giving the victims the justice that they deserved and not the repentance of these criminals. Therefore, the justice for such heinous crime should be the death penalty and not just life in prison without parole. I could not accept the idea that criminals are living off from taxpayer’s money more particularly the families of the victim’s. I am not rejecting the possibility that this kind of people might change, but I am most certainly not taking the risk that they would not change and continue to be a harmful threat to the public safety in the future…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Physician Assisted Sucide

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    My Respond: I cannot imagine myself taking someone life because I am a very strong believer in God, but in life in general that I believe that when God is ready for us to die, we die. So my argument is that we should take someone life.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Society demands that punishment should fix the harm it has done. By sentencing a person to death no harm has been fixed. As long as capital punishment exists in our society it will continue to spark the injustice, which it has failed to curb. The death penalty is morally and socially unethical, should be construed as cruel and unusual punishment, has no proof of acting as deterrent, and risks the appalling and unacceptable injustice of executing innocent people. It does not matter who does the killing as long as a life is taken by another, it should always be considered…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is outdated, irreversible, hypocritical, and ineffective and deterring criminals, and should therefore be abolished. There are many things wrong with executing criminals, but some of the most compelling reasons are these: it is barbaric, does not positively affect murder rates, and to put it simply, two wrongs do not make a right.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Behind the Crime

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Becarria, “individuals commit crimes because they have made a choice to do so.” (Aberle 46) I agree with this statement completely. It is an individual’s choice if they’re going to steal from an elderly lady down on Fremont, or kill the family that’s living in the house next door to you. Humans have full control of their body. However, if they have a mental illness well, that a different case. A mentally ill human is more vulnerable however, then a fully aware person. In some cases opposite from Becarria, I don’t agree with the death penalty. Becarria “felt that the death penalty, while cruel and excessive, was also an ineffective measure to reduce or punish crime.” We as a country can just go and kill people off. By making them feel completely secluded from the world I feel, is a better punishment. However, in slaughter cases, murder, do they deserve the death penalty? Maybe in some cases yes. The death penalty I believe should be used in a more high risk cases. On the other hand, the crime should be determined on how serious the crime was that the suspect has committed willingly.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many look upon this topic as a religious moral issue. The National Coalition against Death Penalty states that “the death penalty devalues all human life- eliminating the possibility for transformation of human spirit.” This organization also states that the death penalty “is fallible and irrevocable” , their studies show that over 100 inmates have been released from death row after new technological testing regarding their cases found them to be innocent.(1) On the reverse side of this religious outlook, there are those such as J. Melton that believe, the death penalty was started by God, himself when wrote in the bible, “He that killeth by the sword must be killed by the sword.”(Revelations 13:10). (2) There have been studies by Emory University professors, in 2003, state that each execution deters an average of 18 murders. A similar study in 2004 stated that it is believed that speeding up execution would strengthen deterrent effect. For every 2.75 years cut from time spent on death row it is said that 1 murder would be prevented. Another aspect of the death penalty is that of those who believe that rehabilitation is ineffective and capital punishment is the only punishments that is equivalent to some of the violent offenses committed and think that it is a way for closure for the families of the victims.(3) In my opinion, I believe that it is not just a…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics paper

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One view on this topic is that killing is wrong, there is no justified killing, and murder is just wrong, no ifs ands or buts about it. It says in the bible that thou shall not kill for it is a sin to take a life out of envy or hate. Everyone is god’s children and all should obey what he teaches. It is wrong to take ones life out of anger or even if it is to protect ones self. And one should accept the fate that lies ahead. Some would understand this view because it is wrong to take someone life no matter what the situations is. If a person has a conscience then that should tell them that murdering someone is bad. Even if someone is in a life or death situation and it is either them or the killer, that person is going to die because they believe it is just morally wrong to do that to a person. And they may not go down without a fight and would probably try and get the person that is trying to kill them to see that killing someone is wrong. But they…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, violent crimes and murder are inexusable and people who commit these crimes should be adequately punished and removed from society, but the death penalty has too many flaws such as being morally wrong, being carried out inhumanely, the execution of innocent people and the huge financial cost to our society. With all of these reasons, I do not agree with the death…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some people are against the killing of others for any reasons. Other people feel that certain crimes should be punished by death. The death penalty is a very controversial topic in the United States today and has been for a number of years, because people's life is at risk. The reviewing the numbers of facts prove that the death penalty should not be enforced. I think death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights. It violates the right to life as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is the ultimate cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment. It should be abolished in this country it's racial discrimination, the financial cost and barbarity.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    is killing ever justified

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In conclusion each of the above needs to be justified on their own merits. Killing someone as punishment for what they have done to you is not always right but, of these justified I guess each has to be assessed on its own merits but deep down I believe that life is very precious and should…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Christians, we also have to ask what form of punishment is morally aligned with our beliefs. In Margaret Falls article Against the Death Penalty: Christian Stance in a Secular World she makes the point “that each of us [have] a fundamental moral obligation to respect the inherent worth of persons”. To continue that point the Bible tells us that we were all put here on earth for a reason, a special purpose given to us by God, if we take the life of another, even if we view it as just, we are still ending the chance of that person fulfilling their purpose. We are denying them…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    <br>The Bible states "Thou shalt not kill," and this being a sin should have to be amended within oneself. However, the Bible also states "Don't judge others' personal convictions." It is the government's responsibility to punish people that disobey the law to keep our world in tact but is it their right to take away their lives? It is a Christian's responsibility to point out to those who sin that they do so and this country, trusting in God as it says it does, should do just that. So if the government stands strongly by this statement that's on the dollar bill, may they line up all the liars, adulterers, Buddhists, thieves, covetous and murderers at the chair. If they shall look into this one sin as so evil may they see all ten commandments so holy.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays