How does capital punishment and liberty coexist in the same philosophical frame? Do we as citizens of the United States truly follow the motives of liberty in the correct manner by enforcing capital punishment, or are we just claiming something that we are not? The argument surrounding capital punishment has been an ongoing battle for a very long time, and I sincerely believe that capital punishment and liberty can coexist in the same philosophical frame for a number of reasons. Enforcing the death penalty can create a safer environment for American citizens. Capital punishment is capable of deterring criminals of committing future crimes that would eventually earn them the death penalty. Also the death penalty honors god. One would ask themselves, does anyone truly deserve to die? Does anyone truly deserve to take the life of another? Are we as citizens of the United States acting as god? Basic questions such as these are always running through the minds of everyday individuals when the case involves capital punishment. Capital Punishment also known as the death penalty is the execution of a certain individual by judicial process as a penalty because of the crime that they committed. Crimes that can cause the death penalty to occur are also known as capital crimes or capital offenses. Once an individual has been put on death row, their individual liberty automatically gets stripped away from them. Liberty is the concept or philosophical idea that gives an individual the right to believe according to their own personal responsibility and free will. A good demonstration of liberty is through the first amendment which is imprinted in the bill of rights. The first amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people...