Throughout the United States history, Capital Punishment or The Death Penalty, is the sentence given to individuals who have committed a seriously heinous crimes. The Death Penalty can consist of various methods of bringing on death to a convicted criminal: Lethal injection is the most commonly used method; however, some other states allow electrocution, gas chambers, hanging and a firing squad. The Death Penalty is a very controversial issue amongst people within the United States. A large amount of individuals believe that the penalty to death is a just punishment for a serious crime. According to Waller (2008), " The classic argument for capital punishment is retributive: blood deserves blood, those who commit murder deserve to die, and justice is not done when a murderer is allowed to live". (pg 246) Consequently there is an opposing for as well where individuals believe that an eye for an eye approach is not the ethical or moral approach to take for such a situation.
I personally believe that Capital Punishment is a morally wrong, unethical, brutal, and heinous approach to take in punishing a convicted individual, regardless of the seriousness or brutality of their committed crime. I find that I have no personal need to suspend judgment on this particular subject, as there is a serious of the lack of morality connected to the topic at hand. The Death Penalty/Capital Punishment proves to be against my ethics and morals that were instilled in me from a very young age. Throughout history, numerous individuals have been sentenced to the punishment of death under unfair, unethical, and discriminatory terms. Consequently, there have been individuals whom have been found innocent after already receiving the death penalty, these are the consequences taking the life of an individual within the justice system.
While I have numerous reasons for taking this strong opposing position on this particular topic; I base the reasoning behind my position on my own personal moral judgment and ethical decision making. Although individuals whom are sentenced to the Death Penalty or Capital Punishment may have actually committed very heinous and serious crimes, they still do not deserve to have their right to live taken away. They possess a human life, that regardless of what actions that have taken, they are still worthy of living and not being killed. Murder is the number one punishable crime to receive the Death Penalty/Capital Punishment in the United States. When one murders they are taking the life of another individual, however executing the convicted individual is the worst kind of murder, which is premeditated murder. An eye for an eye is not the moral or ethical approach to punishing any person whom is convicted of a crime, whether it is robbery or murder. The murder of one does not constitute the right to murder another, as the loss of the convicted individuals life does not make any situation even, right, or more easily dealt with.
Largely, status quo supports the death penalty. "Capital punishment is often defended on the grounds that society has a moral obligation to protect the safety and welfare of its citizens. Murderers threaten this safety and welfare. Only by putting murderers to death can society ensure that convicted killers do not kill again". (Andre, 2010, para 2) Consequently, as stated throughout this paper, there is not always clear and solid evidence to support one that is being sentenced to such a punishment. The citizens of the United States are well aware of the use of capital punishment, yet this knowledge has not deterred the large amounts of violent crimes committed each year. Heinous punishments such as the death penalty does not teach and promote the value of human life, in many ways such a punishment places little value on human lives and cheapens the value our society places on lives.
My own personal ethics and morals do not allow me to agree with Capital...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document