It is only just that the worst, most appalling crimes deserve the harshest possible punishment, the capital punishment. Although the death penalty is considered a cruel and unusual punishment, life time incarceration can be seen as a form of torture and thus making the death penalty more humane by default. Capital punishment is often attacked due to the fact that in the past innocent citizens have been convicted to it. However, most of these arguments made were before the advancement in DNA analysis. At a crime scene “the chance of coincidental genetic matches may be in the range of 1 in billions to 1 in several quadrillion” (http://deathpenalty.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=002000) leaving the margin for error less than an 1%. Thanks to the system of DNA analysis, capital punishment would have virtually no errors on whom the person is that was convicted. Now that the death penalty wont convict innocent people for crimes that they have not committed, know there is no downfall to showing convicts justice. Even though the margin of error is very small, no justice system is ever 100% accurate. If we as humans don't want systems that are not 100% accurate then "The inevitability of a mistake should not serve as grounds to eliminate the death penalty any more than the risk of having a fatal wreck should make automobiles illegal..." (http://deathpenalty.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=002000#5) and there has not been one recorded event of an innocent person receiving the death penalty since 1976. It doesn't give a good impression if we show prisoners more sympathy than the actual victim. "Society is justly ordered when each person receives what is due to him." (http://www.philforhumanity.com/Capital_Punishment.html) Crime doesn't stop ever, criminals that break laws thinking that they can go to court and have a lawyer try to appeal for them and get them out of the death penalty or even out of jail. But if the capital...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document