Preview

Business Law Problems

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2690 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Business Law Problems
1. What are the four elements of a valid contract? A contract is an "agreement between parties, with terms and conditions that describe the agreement that constitutes a legal obligation" (All Business). A valid contract requires four elements and these are: a. Mutual agreement – there must be a meeting of the minds between parties. There should be an offer and an acceptance. There should be an agreement to enter into the contract b. Consideration - meaning that "every party is conferring a benefit on the other party or himself sustaining a recognizable detriment, such as a reduction of the party's alternative courses of action where the party would otherwise be free to act with respect to the subject matter without any limitation" (Wikipedia). This simply means that there should be something given and something received. c. Legality - The good or service being exchanged must be legal d. Capacity – both parties should be legally competent to enter into the agreement.
2. Describe the objective theory of contracts. How does that theory apply to this case? In layman's term, the objective theory of contracts simply means that "we look at whether a reasonable person to whom the statement was address would believe it to be an offer" (Lloyd). In the case of PepsiCo's advertisement and Leonard suit, it is obvious that there is no contract on the basis of the objective theory. As the judge ruled "an objective reasonable person would not have considered the commercial an offer" (John D.R. Leonard vs. PepsiCo). The commercial was supposed to be humorous and an objective person would look at it that way and not really an offer just like Leonard assumed it was.
3. Why do you think the court held that there was not a valid agreement here? The court held that that there is no valid agreement here because the commercial was evidently was made in jest. Also if we look at one of the four elements of a valid contract, there is no mutual agreement between PepsiCo and



Bibliography: All Business. Legal Requirements for A Contract. Retrieved 25 October 2006 from http://www.allbusness.com ARL Website (1999) Legal Information Institute. United States Constitution. Retrieved 25 October 2006 from http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution Lloyd, R.M (2003) Petrova. R. (2002). The Impact of E-Commerce on the Global Economy. London: International Association for Official Statistics Reid T., Priest L.L.P Pearson Education, publishing as Fact Monster. Retrieved 25 Oct. 2006 from . Trakman, L.E. (2003) From the Medieval Law Merchant to the E-Merchant Law. Toronto: University of Toronto Law Journal.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    BUSINESS LAW QUESTIONS

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. A state's constitution can't conflict with the U.S. Constitution or a federal law.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Leonard v Pepsico Inc.(88 F. Supp. 2d 116(S.D.N.Y. 1999) the alleged offer to acquire a Harriet fighter jet for the 700.000$ worth of Pepsi points was so outlandish that reasonable person would not believe it. Therefore there was no contract.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Trade Joe Essay

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Firstly, the Trade Joe had long-term partnerships with NDP and Dairy Smart Inc., and they maintained healthy relationships for many years. However, the Trade Joe violated contracts unilaterally, and the author pointed out that Trade Joe was also “intentional interference with contractual relations; unjust enrichment, breach of contract, and acting in bad faith” (Echeverria, 2004). Therefore, the Trade Joe’s behavior was unethical, and it should not use these methods to achieve its purpose, which damaged interests of NDP and Dairy Smart Inc.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Midterm

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A contract requires 1) an agreement, 2) consideration, 3) legality, and 4) capacity. An agreement is made when there is an offer with the intent to be bound by the offer, reasonably definite terms, and communication of offer to offeree by offeror. The offer could be terminated either by revocation, rejection, expiration, or operation of law.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This case involved a contract dispute between Mr. John Leonard and PepsiCo Inc. arising from the claims that an advertisement by PepsiCo for a Harrier jet aircraft in exchange for Pepsi points was a valid contract. The court found that the advertisement was not an offer and ruled for the defendant.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Defendant PepsiCo conducted a promotional campaign in Seattle, Washington from October 1995 to March 1996. The promotion, titled "Pepsi Stuff," attempted to persuade consumers into collecting numerous "Pepsi Points" in order to redeem them for merchandise featuring the Pepsi logo. During this campaign, PepsiCo launched a promotional commercial intended for the ‘Pepsi Generation,' in order to gain the largest possible response to help push their campaign. One such commercial shows a well dressed teenager preparing for school simultaneously advertising a t-shirt, leather jacket and sunglasses for various reasonable point values. As the scene shifts to the outside of a high school, the teenager from the beginning scene opens the cockpit of a Harrier Jet just as the words "HARRIER FIGHTER 7,000,000 PEPSI POINTS" appear on the screen. The plaintiff John Leonard viewed this commercial and then later attempted to purchase the Harrier Jet with the advertised "Pepsi Points" from PepsiCo but was denied. Leonard later sued Pepsi on the grounds that the "Pepsi Stuff" commercial constituted an offer for a Harrier Jet. Whether or not the commercial made this proposal is the main question asked in this case. Since the plaintiff is young, adventurous and of the ‘Pepsi Generation,' the supposed offer appealed to him tremendously. Leonard claimed that he was so inspired by this commercial that he set out to obtain a Harrier Jet from the defendant PepsiCo by obtaining the advertised amount of "Pepsi Points". On March 27, 1996, the plaintiff submitted an Order Form with $700,008.50 and the required 15 original Pepsi Points along with a letter to "obtain a new Harrier Jet as advertised in your Pepsi Stuff commercial"(Leonard v PepsiCo, 3). The order form submitted by the plaintiff stated that only catalogue merchandise can be redeemed through the program. Letters were exchanged until…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cola War Case

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Master Bottle Contract (Coke): Coke had the right to determine concentrate price and other terms of sale - no legal obligation to assist bottlers in ad but made huge investment to support them anyways…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harrier Jet Case Study

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The court ruled that the Harrier Jet commercial was just an advertisement meant as an offer to negotiate and not as a contract. The core legal issue is whether an advertisement can be considered a serious offer.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Contract of Laws

    • 6456 Words
    • 26 Pages

    A contract is generally called on obligationary agreement. In other word, contract is an agreement which actually creates legal obligation. The agreement will be a contract if only the parties intended to create an obligations, and if, in addition, the agreement comply with all other requirements which the law sets for the creation of obligations by agreement (such as the contractual capacity of the parties., possibility of performance, legality of the agreement, and prescribed formalities).…

    • 6456 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Question Business Law

    • 2042 Words
    • 9 Pages

    FC held : The consideration was adequate because the respondent has agreed to transfer the land to the appellant for $500. There was a valid contract.…

    • 2042 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    HR Manager

    • 2757 Words
    • 12 Pages

    3. A ten year employee with a company was assured by the supervisor that the employee would always have a job. Three months later, the employee was called to jury duty and assigned to a trial that lasted six months. The employer hired someone to take over the job and was then unable to find the employee a suitable position after the trial. This situation may violate all of the following exceptions to the doctrine of employment at will EXCEPT:…

    • 2757 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ca Nannu Mia's Note

    • 18615 Words
    • 75 Pages

    The Contract and Agency Act------------1872. The Sales of Goods Act---------------------1930. The Partnership Act------------------------1932. The Negotiable Instrument Act-----------1881. The Bankruptcy Act------------------------1997. The Arbitration Act-------------------------2001.…

    • 18615 Words
    • 75 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cotract Law

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A contract is an agreement between two or more parties, with the intention of creating a legal obligation, which may have elements in writing. And it can be made orally.This agreement creates a legal relationship of rights and duties on the parties and if these obligations in the agreement are not fulfilled then serious action could be taken by the courts on the party. There are three key elements for the conception of a contract. These are offer, acceptance, consideration and an intention to create legal relations. Generally the parties to a written contract comprehend that they have entered into a binding agreement, but they do not always grasp this point when making an oral or implied contract. It is always difficult to prove the terms of an oral or implied contract than those of a written one.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal Notes

    • 3570 Words
    • 15 Pages

    c) Free and genuine contract:-Two parties must give their Free and genuine contract to the term of agreement. Such consent should not obtain one or more of following manners i.e.…

    • 3570 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Contract and Offer

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A contract is defined as an agreement enforceable by law. Hence for all contracts there should have an agreement. The agreement arises by one of the parties making an offer and its acceptance by the other party. Both offer and acceptance create an agreement. In simple contract should first contain an offer made by one party to the other.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays