Preview

Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company, Petitioner V. Sheila White

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1751 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company, Petitioner V. Sheila White
LEGAL ANALYSIS

1. STATEMENT OF FACTS: Sheila White interviewed with Marvin Brown and obtained a job as a “track laborer” with Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company. Shortly after her hire date, however, she assumed forklift operator duties. This new assignment still fell under the “track laborer” position description, and White occasionally performed those duties although her primary responsibility was operating the forklift. Three months into her new job, White complained to the company that her immediate supervisor was sexually harassing her on the job. He was temporarily suspended and required to attend sexual harassment training. White was then informed that she was being reassigned to track labor duties only. White filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) claiming that the job reassignment was in retaliation for her sexual harassment complaint.
Two months later after getting into a disagreement with her new supervisor, Brown put White on indefinite suspension without pay for being insubordinate. An internal investigation, however, found that White had not been insubordinate, and after 37 days she was reinstated with back pay. White filed another retaliation complaint with EEOC and, ultimately, took her case to federal court where a jury awarded her $43,500 in compensatory damages. The District Court denied a post-trial motion set by Burlington and eventually the Court of Appeals upheld the District Court’s judgment in favor of White.

2. LEGAL ISSUE STATEMENT: Did Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company discriminate against employee Sheila White by violating the Anti-retaliation provision of Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964 when it 1) assigned her to different job duties after she complained of sexual harassment; and 2) later suspended her without pay?

3. APPLICABLE LEGAL RULES:
a. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
(Antidiscrimination provision) Sec 703 (a) “It shall be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) may take action when an investigation shows that there has been a violation in a person’s civil rights just because of his or her attributes.…

    • 2010 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, it is clear to me how and why the judge was able to include those who were not specificity directed by the company’s actions to be included in the outcome of the ruling. Title VII was put in place to help protect minorities in the workplace and those in search of employment. This Act which was passed in 1964, prohibits discriminations in regards to the process of hiring, firing, and training, promoting and disciple along with the advertisement of open positions. This Act also includes any workplace decisions that are based on an employees or an applicant’s race, gender, national origin, or religion. The Title VII Act goes as far as including hiring, pay, and the terms of employment, available training layoffs and benefits. The Local 28 Steel Metal Workers had their hiring and promotion system worded and set up so that only white males would be interested, accepted and feel comfortable in applying for the apprenticeship position along with the ability to move up the union ladder into the union and journeymen position. The goal of the apprenticeship was to find themselves in the local 28 union. This process was set to up to discourage minority’s (specifically black males) from applying. Thus the sheet metal group local 28 was not only in violation of the Title VII Act but also the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), The court system (attempted) to step in to make the sheet metal workers union of local 28 compliant with the (EEOC) and the Title VII Act without success as eighteen years the steel workers were still not compliant with the courts orders.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    federal laws

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII prohibits discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, and national original. Title VII applies to all private employers, state and local governments, and education institutions that employ 15 or more individuals.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lilly Ledbetter was one of the very few female supervisors at the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. plant in Gadsden, Alabama, and she worked at that plant for nineteen years, from 1979 till her retirement in 1998. Initially, when she started working for the company, her pay was equal to that of the other male supervisors. However, as time passed the pay discrepancy between Ledbetter and her 15 male counterparts was stark: the lowest she received was $3,727 per month, while the lowest paid male received $4,286. Thus, after realizing this Mrs. Ledbetter filed an official complaint before the EEOC in March 1998, stating that Goodyear violated the Title VII as they paid her a discriminatory low salary due to her sex. After she filed an official complaint, her case went to trial, and the jury concluded that the pay disparity was due to intentional discrimination. However, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed the jury verdict, as it claimed Mrs. Ledbetter’s’ case was not filed in time, as the original discriminatory pay decision occurred before the statutory limitations of 180 days.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eeoc Paper

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The purpose of this paper is to go over a lawsuit that was filled by the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The paper will cover who the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) is and their role in the lawsuit. It will go over whether or not the lawsuit promotes social change. The paper will also go over how the EEOC as well as other news groups released information about the case to the public. I will then give my take on how I would implement new strategies to make sure the problem does not come up in the workplace again.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is affirmative action fair? In 1974, a woman named Rose was truned down for a supervisory job in…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper will outline a complaint process and illustrate the civil litigation that could follow if the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, through mediation and arbitration cannot resolve a charge. The complaint is based on a scenario of an employee, named John. John works for a private sector business and he wishes to lodge a complaint of discrimination against the company he works for. This paper will explain the steps that are taken, from the beginning with the (EEOC), Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The paper will continue explaining the process by illustrating the civil litigation steps from the state level to the highest level of the United States Supreme Courts.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1943 Congress introduced the very first equal employment bill but it failed to pass both houses. Congress for the next twenty years introduced equal employment bills but they were either kicked by committee or died under the threat of Senate filibusters. The failure of these bills were no surprise given the history of discrimination in this country but what was a surprise was the success of the equal employment provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reeves vs Ch Robinson

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Facts of the case: Ingrid Reeves, a Transportation Sales Representative files an appeal on the summary judgment in favor if C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. on her hostile work environment sexual harassment claims. Reeves was the only female TSR in the C.H. Robinson Birmingham, Alabama branch office. She worked in a workstation pod cubicle and claims that sexually offensive language permeated the air in her pod daily from the Summer of 2001 to the Spring of 2004. In addition to sexually explicit radio programming she was on one occasion exposed to pornographic images. This behavior continued even after several complaints to her co-workers and supervisors.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There once was a time when common sense and compassion were used to decide what to do with issues, but now that there are laws put in place to ensure that legal, safety, and regulatory requirements are obeyed there are less issues. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is one of those regulations. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission enforces federal laws which make it illegal for any organization to discriminate against someone applying for the position or someone who is already an employee for reasons like their race, gender, color of skin, age, disability, or religion. (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2011) This also ensures that a person who is claiming that they were discriminated against is not discriminated for that. These laws are applied to any type of work situations, like harassments, wages/benefits, hiring/firing, promotions, or any type of training. If a company discriminates based…

    • 854 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The case of brown v. board of education was one of the biggest turning points for African Americans to becoming accepted into white society at the time. Brown vs. Board of education to this day remains one of, if not the most important cases that African Americans have brought to the surface for the better of the United States. Brown v. Board of Education was not simply about children and education (Silent Covenants pg 11); it was about being equal in a society that claims African Americans were treated equal, when in fact they were definitely not. This case was the starting point for many Americans to realize that separate but equal did not work. The separate but equal label did not make sense either, the circumstances were clearly not separate but equal. Brown v. Board of Education brought this out, this case was the reason that blacks and whites no longer have separate restrooms and water fountains, this was the case that truly destroyed the saying separate but equal, Brown vs. Board of education truly made everyone equal.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Employment discrimination and harassment occurs in the workplace for a variety of reasons. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 identified race, sex, religion, and national origin as discrimination criteria. This paper will address those issues covered under the Civil Rights Act. When making an assessment concerning employment discrimination or harassment for any legal action, it is important to review the relevant legal standards and procedures.…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    •Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin;…

    • 912 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rule of Law: As per title VII of the civil rights of 1969, creating a hostile and…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education dates back to 1954, the case was centered on the Fourteenth Amendment and challenged the segregation of schools solely on the basis of race. The Brown case was not the only case of its time involving school segregation, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) was leading the push to desegregate public schools in the United States (Gold, 2005). Brown v. Board of Education was a consolidation of four cases that had made their way through the court system.…

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays