Preview

Both Speeches Deal with Patriotic and Sombre Subjects. Compare and Contrast How Effectively They Have Conveyed Their Messages. 300-400 Words

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
309 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Both Speeches Deal with Patriotic and Sombre Subjects. Compare and Contrast How Effectively They Have Conveyed Their Messages. 300-400 Words
Both speeches deal with patriotic and sombre subjects. Compare and contrast how effectively they have conveyed their messages. 300-400 words

The point of any speech is to connect with an audience (and persuade them) on a far deeper level than any written form can provide. That connection may be through ideals such as patriotism or sombre subjects. The Funeral Service of the Unknown Soldier spoken by Prime Minister Paul Keating, deals with both patriotic and sombre ideals. Through positive language, emotive language as well as other techniques, a sombre and patriotic subject is expressed. We can also compare and contrast these ideals to William Deane’s speech on the occasion of an ecumenical service for the victims of the Canyoning tragedy.

Although both speeches encompass ideals of patriotism and somberness, we contrast them to that the audience and the context in which these speeches occurred. Sir William Deane’s speech uses inclusive language, solemn tone, multiculturalism and emotive and positive language to highlight the extent of the tragedy, but also to then bring everyone in mourning together and bring the renewal of life, seasonal imagery used as quoted “the golden wattles are coming into bloom”. The Unknown Soldier contrasts as of it having sentences that tries to evoke depictions of war, than a triumph of positive language to bring all Australians together. Although both speeches have ideals of patriotism and somberness, both speakers use different techniques in order to establish the mood and tone of the speech.

Emotive language, inclusive language, multiculturalism irrespective of their background as well as positive language is used in both texts in order to create a bond between audience and the remembered. Through exploration of these techniques, we establish the patriotic and sombre natures in these speeches. Although different in textual context, both are a celebration of Australian values; mateship, loyalty, honour and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    What I like about both speeches, though different and same is the men who spoke. I chose these speeches, because these men were great leaders, and actually seemed to have a lot of the views I do, which are pretty great. For example, JFK says on page 3, paragraph 6 of NEWSELA, “Let both sides explore what problems unite us instead of focusing on those problems that which divide us.” To me it has a greater significance, because it doesn’t just apply to the world, but everything we do, and it’s great he brought that up into the world of politics. Along with Lincoln, who states on Page 2, paragraph 8 of NEWSELA, “ With malice towards none; with charity for all; with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford both gave incredibly powerful speeches, however, they both wrote these in a very different manner. Richard Nixon was very blunt while Ford repeated himself and prolonged his speech. In the second paragraph of Nixon’s speech, he stated, “..it has become evident to me that I no longer have a strong enough political base in the congress to justify continuing that effort” (Address Announcing Resignation). In just the second paragraph of his speech, he wants to let it be known that he is aware that being the President of the United States is not a viable option anymore. On the other hand, Ford waited until the concluding paragraph of his speech in order to fully state his explanation for pardoning Nixon.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ((I'm not sure if this is all too helpful, but I needed to post one of my essays for the free membership thingy...))…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bruce Dawe has used a variety of literary devices to represent specific marginalised groups in ways that challenge their reader’s perceptions. Two of his poems; ‘Homecoming’ and ‘Weapons Training’ are key and transparent examples of literary devices being utilised to represent specific marginalised groups. Both of these poems were set during the 1950’s, with Vietnam being written to represent soldiers pre-war and homecoming to represent soldiers returning to Australia. During this time period, the Australian nation lived via a very patriarchal manner, and had the utmost respect and admiration of their soldiers that fought during the world wars. However, it has been noted in Australian history that there was very little to no compassion given towards the returning soldiers from Vietnam; Homecoming is an attack at society for their reverence and respect-or lack of. This represents the marginalised soldiers from the Vietnam War, for the War Veterans from WW1 and WW2 had always traditionally returned home to a hero’s welcome, greeted at the airway and society’s full support to the brave soldiers who had risked and possibly given their lives for the country. Weapons Training is another war poem, but this time targets young soldiers pre-war on what can be assumed as a final addressing before taking into the ranks, this poem however various from the previous, the soldiers would have gone into the War with the expectation of being given thanks and praise for their bravery, instead they were barked at, abused and insulted. Dawe has represented both of the marginalised soldiers in both of the respective poems through his use of literary devices which can all fall under the brackets of a) Imagery and b) language, integrating into some finer details.…

    • 2124 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Franklin D. Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy both had significant speeches, they were similar but also completely different. Both Roosevelt's “Four Freedoms” speech and Kennedy's inaugural address both talk about freedom. However, Roosevelt’s speech talks more about World War Two and defending liberty. Whereas Kennedy’s speech talks more about the threat of nuclear power.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion the Gettysburg Address is a brief summary of Pericles speech. They both talk about the people who have died and how honorable it was to have done so. The also both start off speaking of those who came before them, and how they have inspired present day situations. "I shall begin with our ancestors: it is both just and proper that they should have the honor of the first mention on an occasion like the present." (Pericles "Funeral Oration") "Our fore fathers brought on this continent, a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.(Lincoln " Gettysburg Address") Another thing recognized in both speeches is the fact that there is a democracy and it is not going anywhere. "—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth." (Lincoln "Gettysburg Address") "Our constitution does not copy the laws of neighboring states; we are rather a pattern to others than imitators ourselves. Its administration favours the many instead of the few; this is why it is called a democracy. If we look to the law, they afford equal justice to all in their private differences." (Pericles "Funeral Oration")…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    significance in terms of our understanding of these speeches, their context, their authors, their audience,…

    • 424 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    at last, thank God Almighty, we are free at last!" Martin Luther King, Jr. also…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the years, 1863 and 1865, Abraham Lincoln gave two of the most powerful speeches in history. The first speech, “The Gettysburg Address”, was an empowering piece that gave comfort to the public when the Union most needed it. The other speech, “The Second Inaugural Address”, was an influential speech about Abraham Lincoln returning to office for a second term. Both speeches, utilizes rhetoric through the use of ethos, logos, and pathos to support Abraham Lincoln’s viewpoints of the Civil War.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    module B essay

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Speeches form an interpretation of historical events and values which are moulded around the speaker's opinions and ideology. Paul Keating's 'Funeral Service of the Unknown Australian Soldier' 1993 and Noel Pearson's 'An Australian History for Us All' 1996, demonstrate a contrast between how a historical and contextual understanding of these speeches helps create the necessary apperception on the given audience to convey the speaker's message appropriately. Despite the fact that both speeches were given in the mid 1990s, they were addressed to different types of audiences; Pearson's being delivered to a small, highly academic audience, while Keating's was broadcasted to the entire nation. They also addressed differing topics addressing patriotism within Australian society; the history of Indigenous mistreatment, and Australian participation in war, and were therefore perceived quite individually.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. The main difference between these two is the size. Wallabies tend to be smaller.2. The population of both range between 30 to 60 million.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Memorable speeches have a capacity for reinterpretation within changing contexts, and are hence open in their possibilities. Their endurance stems from this flexibility via their use of rhetorical devices to address universal concepts and values.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hey Jessica interesting perspective I think that both of these speeches were both to bring their country together against what they felt as the enemy. Both of these speeches were filled not only with passion; but fury as well both countries were getting ready for separate wars, but the main objective was to take down their "enemy" weather it be Japan for America or Germany for America.…

    • 67 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fly Away Peter Analysis

    • 2215 Words
    • 9 Pages

    As the object of war became more surreal and Jim had thought about enlisting he uncovered a nervous feeling, “It was as if the ground before him, that has only minutes ago stretched away to a clear future, had suddenly titled in the direction of Europe, in the direction of events, and they were all now on a dangerous slope.” Australia depicted the image of war as a symbol for pride. On the streets there were signs urging men to sign up, “Pictures of the king and queen with crossed flags on either side, one Australian, the other the union jack. And the streets did feel different.” In both texts the pressures of patriotism and pride influence the men’s decision to enlist as a ‘honorable choice’, rather than a forceful act. It shows soldiers have enlisted to ‘serve’ a good cause by defending their country, yet not informing them of the change of mind they may have when they experience the horror of war first hand, and wish to come…

    • 2215 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of Prime Minister Paul Keating’s speech ‘Funeral Service of an Unknown Australian Soldier’ was to affirm Australia’s culture and values through reflection on the symbolic power of the sacrifice of the Unknown Australian soldier in World War One. In this patriotic speech he explores the paradox that an ordinary person can achieve the same kind of greatness as the unknown Australian Soldier. He says “It was a lesson about ordinary people- and the lesson was that they were not ordinary.” Keating uses this concept to develop his view of the Australian identity and sees this identity “as free and independent” and essentially democratic. He elevates the Unknown Soldier as a symbol of democracy and uses him to define “what it means to be Australian.” Therefor paradoxically he argues that the Unknown Soldier will continue to serve his country in the future as a symbol of unification.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays