12/10/14
History: Emergence of the modern United States Portfolio
Dialogue
Booker T Washington: I’m completely against imperialism. I’m against the act America took on taking the Asian pacific islands and Hawaii.
Theodore Roosevelt: Why would you be against it? Imperialism is a new concept; it will strengthen the military, and also establish the country as a world power.
Booker T Washington: I agree that imperialism would strengthen the military, however I don’t agree about the taking of Asian pacific islands and Hawaii.
Theodore: The United States had dreamed of building a canal in Central America.
Booker T Washington: Well, I’m sure you have interesting ideas, but I don’t want to be a part of anything concerning imperialism.
Theodore: Everyone believes in imperialism, so I don’t understand why you don’t want to be apart pf it.
Booker T Washington: Everyone does not believe or like imperialism. American’s is falling for Social Darwinism, and American’s is embracing social Darwinism was that they had long believed that god had granted them the right and responsibility to settle frontier.
Theodore: Once people get to know more about the imperialism they will forget all about the social Darwinism.
Booker T: One of the causes of imperialism about nationalism and social Darwinism is that imperialist feel a moral duty to spread their culture to peoples they feel inferior. Also you’re group is trying to take Philippines.
Theodore: We could not give the Philippines back that would be cowardly and dishonorable.
Booker T: So you guys is taking and controlling other people?
Theodore: we have no choice but to take them all and educate the Filipinos and uplift and civilize them.
Booker T: That’s basically controlling them which might start trouble or war imperialism is just wrong.
Theodore: The united states have a responsibility to govern the Filipinos if the United States gave up the Philippines other nations would take control of them.
Booker T: Imperialism is a crime and I and others take it as “open disloyalty to the distinctive principles of our government.”
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Another reason why the United States was right to annex the Philippines is because if the United States didn’t annex them, other stronger countries would have taken control over them and…
- 655 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Green, John. "Imperialism: Crash Course World History #35." YouTube. September 20, 2012. Accessed March 02, 2016.…
- 750 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“I had already made up my mind that imperialism was an evil thing and the sooner I chucked up my job and got out of it the better.”…
- 495 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Public opinion found the notion of empire enticing and rejoiced over Dewey’s victory at Manila, a place previously unheard-of by most Americans (“this great big ignorant nation, which doesn’t know even the ABC facts of the Philippine episode,” Twain complained in a 1901 letter to Joseph H. Twichell [qtd. in Paine, Letters 705]). Such jingoism was, at the same time, often opposed for equally base, often racist and xenophobic reasons. Twain’s own opposition is eerily prophetic of opposition to war in both Vietnam and Iraq: the war was “a mess, a quagmire from which each fresh step renders the dif culty of extrication immensely greater” . . . . I thought it would be a great thing to give a whole lot of freedom to the Filipinos, but I guess now that it’s better to let them give it to themselves,” he said in 1900 (Zwick). Yet in the letter to Twichell, he acknowledges that his opposition is, at bottom, sel sh: he feels distress as an American that he is “befouled” in the international eye (that of “the sarcastic world,” as he put it) by such a policy (705). Dualism again: are his motives even partly genuine concern for the Philippines, or, as he suspects of himself, solely a matter of concern for his public image, by now that of…
- 1369 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Nowhere in the constitution can we find a provision that allows us to take actions and annex the Philippines. The constitution is a solid document that was crafted to serve the fair and equal purpose of all the American people. If we make acceptations to the constitution it will cause uproar and be a leeway in the future for even more violations of it.…
- 720 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The negative side and reasons why imperialism wasn’t very legitimate was what happened in the Philippines. President McKinley had the best intentions of transforming this country in to a civilized one. He knew that he shouldn’t give it up to Spain again, nor leave it up to Germany or France that were the commercial rivals; so he…
- 470 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
According to these authors, other ethnics and races besides the white race do not qualify to be civilized. Thus, the white men have the responsibility to lead the world into civilization. In order to carry out their duty, white men’s culture is advocated to expand without a limit to other parts of the world including South America, Africa, and so forth. To put it another way, imperialism is believed to improve the world only under the influence of western education and civilized life style bestowed by the white men. The ideology here…
- 388 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Imperialism is the process of extending the rule of government beyond the boundaries of its original state. History shows a high state of civilization has been produced, the struggle of race with race, and the survival of the physically and mentally fitter race. To know if whether the lower races of man can evolve a higher type, the only course is to leave them to fight it out among themselves and even then there will be struggle for the existence between individual and individual. The struggle of race against race and also nation against nation are very similar. In the early days many were blinded and unconscious struggle of barbaric tribes. At the present day, in the case of the civilized white man, it has become more and more the conscious,…
- 330 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In DuBois’s argument, he states that he considers Booker T. Washington’s approach “the most striking thing in the history of the American Negro since 1876.” He argues that even though Washington did not come up with the first industrial school, he was, however, the first to team up with a school that focuses on trades with the best southerners. DuBois goes on to state Washington is not responsible for the policy of submission for African Americans, even though he was partially a promotion of it, and was in some part a result of disenfranchisement of the Negro. Dubois also discusses that some black Americans were not happy with Booker T. and they did not agree with what he did. I for one, think that is foolish considering he was the only one to take charge and fight for what is right. DuBois also discusses how black men can argue against Washington within reason even though he was an important leader in the black movement and he recommends only praising the good that came with Washington’s ideas and only keeping in mind your opinions on his address.…
- 454 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Imperialism or Social Darwinism is shown through the literature “White Man’s Burden” by Rudyard Kipling, a poem form 1899. In this piece of literature when it says “white man’s burden” it…
- 715 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In Albert Beveridge’s speech “America’s Destiny”, he argues for the U.S. to keep the Philippines after winning it from Spain in 1900. The U.S. was thinking about returning it to Spain or possibly giving it independence, but Beveridge and the imperialists advised otherwise. With control over the Philippines Beveridge saw an opportunity to secure an Asian empire with access to Asian markets and naval control over the Pacific. He even felt it to be America’s “destiny” to have a future strong relationship with the Far East. In addition to benefits to the U.S., he claimed America to have the duty of helping the people of undeveloped lands such as the Filipinos. However, Beveridge makes assumptions based on Anglo-Saxon supremacy that cannot be looked over. He does not consider the wants and freedoms of the Filipinos and assumes that the U.S. has the right to take over another nation of people. While Beveridge has strong, attractive arguments to keep the Philippines: access to Asian markets and naval control over the Pacific for the future, he assumes that the Filipinos are inferior and need to be improved; he does not take in to account whether the Filipino people actually would be willing and eager to let the U.S. control their land and government.…
- 973 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Philippines had been fighting for their independence years before we took them over. “When we made allies of the Filipinos and armed them against Spain…” (Document D, Speech, Bryan) How could we, after arming the Philippines against Spain, take them over? They fought for their independence and right when they thought they got it, we took it again. They fought for their right to govern themselves. We had no right to take them…
- 412 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
glimpse than I had had before of the real nature of imperialism – the real motives for which…
- 960 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Imperialism is a term used by historians to define the phenomenon of empire building during the 19th century. Imperialism was not a new topic because the stronger nations, such as the Great Britain and France, have been colonizing other civilizations for centuries but the concept of nation building took a new turn because of Industrial Revolution. As a result of Industrial Revolution, there was an increase need for European industrialized nations to obtain additional raw materials, and resources. Additionally, there was a need to trade these fast producing materials that were brought from the Industrialization and new trade ports were created in imperialized countries, such as China and India. The Europeans justified these actions of Imperializing to other nations and its citizens through the concept of Social Darwinism. Social Darwinism was an ideology preceded from Charles Darwin and his study of evolution, which he explains in his work “`On the Origin of Species”. In the book, Darwin introduced the idea of natural selection and “Survival of the fittest”, which stated that through time only the strongest species survive. Darwin’s theory was later applied to society with the term coiled Social Darwinism, according to which it is just natural for superior groups to outcompete inferior ones. Karl Pearson supported this idea with his work “National Life from the Standpoint of Science”, in which he stated “How many centuries, how many thousand years, have the Kaffir or the Negro held large districts in Africa undisturbed by the white man? Yet their intertribal struggles have not yet produced a civilization in the least comparable with the Aryan” (527). In this excerpt, Pearson labels Africa as an inferior nation compared to the Aryans and emphasizes that Social Darwinism was destined to happen. The belief of European supremacy and the increasing need for resources and raw materials due to Industrial Revolution made Imperialism inevitable. (How repressed countries…
- 1466 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
option to him because it seemed to have better results. On the other hand, Booker T. Washington recognized existing equally with whites wouldn’t be a simple task. This is why I believe that Washington said “That in all things that are purely social we can be as separate as the fingers, yet as one as the hand in all things essential to mutual progress” (Broesamle & Arthur, 52). Washington was often looked at as…
- 1191 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays