Preview

Bolshevik menshevik split

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
414 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bolshevik menshevik split
Explain why did, the Menshevik and Bolshevik split happened in 1903?

Until 1903 the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks were a single party called the Social democrats. They wanted a communist Russia, following the ideas of Marxism. However with in the party of the social democrats there were two men, Lenin and Plekhanov whom of which had two completely different ideas on how the party was going to be successful in achieving the revolution, causing a split in the social democrats.

Both parties’ were aiming for the same thing but in different ways. The Mensheviks thought that the get revolution the best thing to do was to wait for the bourgeois stage had to happen first. But Lenin thought this was ridiculous and he proclaimed that both the proletarian and bourgeois stages could me merged into one revolution. Another issue the parties disagreed on was the party and its size. Lenin said the smaller the better as it would be more elite and easier to control and mange so they would get the job done faster as the party were smaller so less chain of command, but the Mensheviks thought that the party need to be big so they looks strong but Lenin thought this was a risky choice because of the secret police the more people in a party the more likely information is to be spread.

Plekhanov thought that everyone in his party should have a say or a vote when it came to making decisions but Lenin again thought this was ridiculous has he believed that would take too long, Lenin thought that democratic centralism was the way, this meant members were obedient and leaders gave authority so Lenin gave orders, he was in charge, Plekhanov and Martov seen this like Lenin was a dictator. The Mensheviks wanted to improve working conditions and get pay rises, support the trade unions but Lenin thought that this was a silly idea as they want to make the Russians lives worse so they want the Bolsheviks to take control as it will help them.

In conclusion, the split happened in 1903

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first reason is that Stalin, Bukharin, Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev had different ideologies which contradicted each other, the rules and the practices that Lenin already had in place. Trotsky represented the left wing of the party and believed in the rejection of the New Economic Party, being committed to immediate industrialisation and permanent revolution which was completely different to Bukharin who was on the right wing of the party. Bukharin believed in acceptance of the NEP, he was committed to industrialisation but in the distant future and wanted socialism in one country. On the other hand, Stalin was in the centre which meant that he had a pragmatic commitment to the NEP, he was committed to industrialisation in the near future and socialism should be in one country, which are both similar to Bukharin’s ideas on the right wing. Zinoviev and Kamenev swapped from right to left in 1925, which lost them credibility with the party. The fact that most of the contenders had such different ideas about how to run the country would have caused a struggle because they would not have been able to agree on something between them and would have been competing…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main reasons the Tsarist rule continued during the tome 1881 until 1905 was due to the splits in the political groups. The were 3 main groups, the Social Revolutionaries, the Liberal and the Social Democrats. Each group had a different aim, strategy and target group. The SR's targeted the peasants and lower class, while the liberals were only interested in the educated middle class. Each groups strategy was very different, the liberals went on strike, while the SR's took a more violent approach. The power each group had individually was not enough to threaten the Tsar, however these differences in aims and beliefs within the 3 main groups meant that they could not combine the groups and work together to bring down the tsar. They were unable to unite their cause and were weaker because of it. Furthermore, there was discontent within the political groups. In 1903 the SD's could no longer function as a single group and split into the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks. The division weakened the groups more meaning the Tsar could continue to rule.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In turn, the leadership of Kerensky would seem weak in contrast to the strong, determined leadership of Lenin and then Trotsky. The Bolsheviks were also the only party who opposed the capitalist war; this would evidently generate popularity as many wanted peace.…

    • 989 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The different beliefs in the revolution, this was a big part in the struggle as they all had different beliefs on how Russia would revolt and go into a new stage for Russia. Trotsky had his belief, this was of world revolution. Meaning that Trotsky didn’t believe that Russia could have a revolution on its own, as no socialist society could survive on its own. He didn’t believe that Russia had the economic resources or technological sophistication to complete the transition to socialism on its own. This meant that Trotsky relied on Western Europe and that they would have a revolution, he believed that the communist regimes in western…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bolsheviks consolidated their power after October 1917 however they faced many severe problems which made keeping their power complex. For Lenin and the Bolsheviks winning political power was relatively easy compared with retaining it. The Bolsheviks may have had a temporary majority in the All-Russia soviet in October 1917, but they did not have a majority following in the country as a whole . Russia was in chaos, politically and economically, and normal government had broken down in large areas. . yet lenin was able to overcome these problems and hold ontopower to create the world first communist state. The Bolsheviks overcame these problems by use of violence in the form of repression, and violence in war communism and the red army during the civil war however violence against their opponents was not their only strategy, Lenin also put forward policies of reform which showed that they were willing to compromise their principles to keep hold of power when faced with early problems and after the outbreak of the civil war the disunity of the opposition and the geographical and organisational factors were key factors which helped the Bolsheviks consolidate their grip on power.…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Russian Communist Party first emerged under the Bolsheviks in 1905 when general strikes were organised in St. Petersburg and Moscow. At this time the Bolsheviks, led by Lenin, were a minority group and increasingly divided from the Mensheviks over pace of reform and ideology. It was due to the Tsar’s ignorance throughout World War One that the Bolshevik saw an inadvertent increase in influence of opposing groups. Although, the Bolsheviks were not in power by 1917 their membership was increasing and it was Lenin’s simple slogans, such as ‘Peace, Bread, Land’ that attracted the Russian population, increasing Bolshevik influence. The fact that the Bolsheviks were the only party to promise an end to the war won the ‘hearts and minds’ of the Russian people, which could be argued that Lenin was the most significant individual in the changing influence of the Russian Communist Party. However, it was both the leadership from Lenin and military organisation from Trotsky that meant the October revolution of 1917 was, to a certain extent, a success. Darby argues that ‘Without [Lenin] it is unlikely that the Bolsheviks would have taken power in October’ whilst Figes claims ‘Trotsky became its principal source of public inspiration’. Post the October revolution, the Bolsheviks were a majority in the second All-Russian Congress of Soviets, proving that they had managed to exert a large amount of influence on the Russian population. After this it is more difficult to assess whether it was certain individuals that played a part in the changing influence of the Russian Communist Party as in the summer of 1918 Lenin set up a one-party state and ended the Constituent Assembly. The introduction of the NEP, in 1921, increased party influence as the peasants were allowed a little capitalism back, ending grain requisitioning and armed resistance in the countryside. It is hard to evaluate…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin was important to the Bolshevik seizure of power as he was able to manipulate public opinion using slogans and propaganda. This was also shown early in the year, before Lenin's return to Russia from Switzerland. The Bolsheviks in Russia had printed in 'Pravda' (their newspaper) that their members and followers should support the Provisional Government, and also that they had given serious thought to the idea of combining with the Mensheviks. This was all very contrary to what Lenin wrote in his 'April Theses' which clearly laid out his views and beliefs on the subject. A key point of his 'April Theses' was "No Support for the Provisional Government", yet without him his party were proposing just that. Lenin as an individual was able to force the Bolsheviks to follow his beliefs and goals and without him they may never have chosen this course of action at all. Through his April thesis, particularly the slogans “Peace, Bread, Land” and “All Power to the Soviets”, he was able to harness the support of the Russian people.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Communism and Fascism

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There were still class differences in socialism and they believed that communism would be the last stage of society with no class differences, freedom for everyone, and no government. A lot of people in Russia were very pleased with this thinking, accepting it and hoping that soon their country would become communist. They believed that if there was freedom for them and at the same time no government or class differences, they could all live in agreement.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    There was a rather significant continuity between Lenin and Stalin’s policies on Political Control. When the Bolsheviks first came in to power Lenin banned Liberal parties who where seen as a threat and later banned all parties including the Social Revolutionaries’ (SR’s) who shared similar views to the Communist party. After the SR’s had beaten them in the elections for the constituency assembly Lenin dismissed these elections and closed down the seemly as well as banning the political parties. USSR was now a one party state with secret police (CHEKA) to eliminate any opposition. Stalin simply kept it this way. Stalin also had secret police (NKVD), Before 1924 Lenin and his ’Red terror’ had been successful in eliminating all opposition outside of the communist party and faced none within the party. However, due to Stalin’s controversial takeover he faced heavy opposition. To keep this opposition repressed Stalin carried out a series of purges. To purge the Party meant, expelling members who, in one way or another, were unreliable. The purge of the Party spread, it came to involve more than just the Party. In 1937 it spread to the arm forces and then quickly came to effect the ordinary people. By 1938 virtually the entire population was living in a state of terror. Stalin’s Great terror led to no opposition and USSR was complete in Stalin’s control. This is where Lenin and Stalin differ because under Lenin there had been free fierce and passionate…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On 24-26 October, the Bolshevik Party seized power from Kerensky’s Provisional Government. This was achieved with surprising ease. Retaining their newly acquired power, however, was to prove difficult. Nonetheless, the Bolsheviks proved successful in consolidating their power from 1917-1924, achieving this through a combination of pragmatic reforms and ruthless terror. This ultimately led the Bolsheviks far from their original goals and ideologies, and by 1924, the Soviet Union was a highly centralised one-party state.…

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1917, the Bolsheviks gained power of Russia and were able to hold onto this growing power until 1924 and later. There are several factors that could be considered to be the reason as to why they were able to seize control. It could be said that Lenin was a significant factor due to his pragmatism and his use of terror, however it also could be said that other members of the Bolshevik party such as Leon Trotsky were responsible and perhaps even the Civil War for the Bolsheviks’ hold on power.…

    • 836 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Revolution resulted in a representative government. The Senate, House of Representatives, and the Office of the President were made up of elected officials, giving the people a way to influence change in government. However, a liberal provisional government took control of Russia after Nicholas II abdicated. Another body, the Petrograd Soviet of Workers' and Soldiers' Deputies, wanted more radical change in Russia. Some members were socialists called Mensheviks, while another group of radical socialists were called the Bolsheviks. The socialists called for peace, while the provisional government continued to war. Lenin emerged as the leader of the Bolsheviks, and in 1917 he went to Russia calling for "peace, land and bread." Lenin was a Marxist and wanted to train the working class to become a revolutionary force. On November 7, 1917, the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government in what is called the October Revolution. In 1918, the Bolsheviks renamed themselves the Communist Party. After the war with the Whites, the Communists renamed the lands they ruled to the Soviet Union.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lenin’s contribution to the Bolshevik Party was an essential factor in their consolidation of power during 1917-1924, however; Lenin’s role was not the only factor contributing to their success. The Bolsheviks were regarded as a “minor feature of Russian political life” and it was not until Lenin’s return to Russia that the party became a key player. It can be seen that Lenin played a pivotal role in the consolidation of power due to his background which allowed Lenin to be influenced by a revolutionary upbringing . Through his upbringing, Lenin was able to develop a strong leadership, political insight and determination allowing the Bolsheviks to be lead into power. Whilst the Bolsheviks were in power, Lenin’s role in dealing with uprisings and anti-communist groups was significant as it allowed the Bolsheviks to remain in power. During the November Revolution, Lenin’s role in the signing of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk was substantial as it allowed and ensured that the revolution lasted and guaranteed continuation of Bolshevik power. Due to the introduction of decrees, Lenin was able to gain support mainly through the workers which proved a major factor in Russian society as they made up one third of the population. However, it is argued that Lenin was not the only reason why the Bolsheviks were able to consume power. The continual social unrest following the abdication of Tsar Nicholas, saw an opportunity for a new rise in power. Trotsky’s contributions to the Bolshevik Party were equal to Lenin’s and it was Trotsky’s role in the Civil War which allowed the Bolsheviks to remain in power. In fact, Lenin became a detrimental factor within the Bolsheviks due to his decision to implement War Communism, which resulted in the death of five million people.…

    • 2484 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political opponents of the Tsar were clearly divided in their aims and methods, and consequentially may have contributed to the survival of Tsarist Russia. The main parties were the Social democrats (Bolsheviks and Mensheviks), Social Revolutionaries and Liberals (Octobrists and Kadets). Each of these radical parties had their own separate beliefs on what Russia needed and each aimed for some sort of change. However, within the groups, there were many issues, which they refused to work with each other to solve. The SR believed that Russia’s future lay with the peasantry and so they wanted to give peasants their own land and improve living conditions for working classes. They used tactics such as terrorism and assassinations, such as the assassination of Alexander II. The Liberals also aimed to deal with these social problems facing Russia while establishing a democracy. However, the Liberals, especially Octobrists, did not agree with the violent tactics. They preferred votes and discussions as a way to put across their opinion. In fact, the Liberals were the most moderate of all the radical parties in Russia. They wanted to abolish autocracy and have the power shared between a democratic government. Similarly, the Social Democrat party also wanted to establish a democracy but, once again, without their aggressive methods. While the SR had a terrorist wing, the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks preferred using propaganda campaigns.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays