Blue Spider Project

Only available on StudyMode
  • Download(s) : 317
  • Published : April 2, 2013
Open Document
Text Preview
CRANEFIELD COLLEGE OF PROJECT AND PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT

INDIVIDUAL EXAMINATION FOR

MODULE M1: Project Management: Leading, Creating, Implementing and Improving CASE:The Blue Spider Project

I hereby declare that this assignment is entirely my own work, and that it has not previously been submitted to any other Higher Education Institution. I also declare that all published and unpublished sources have been fully acknowledged and properly referenced. This includes figures, tables and exhibits. Where modified by me, this has also been indicated.

………………………………….. Signed

………………………………….. Delareze Joubert

………………………………….. Date

Table of Contents
1Executive Summary3
2Introduction4
3SWOT Analysis on the Blue Spider Project (Current Situation)5
4Problems Identified through SWOT Analysis10
4.1Lack of Leadership skills for both Henry Gable and Gary Anderson10
4.2Lack of Communication Skills11
4.3Lack of Delegation Skills12
4.4Lack of team effectiveness13
4.5The following functions are furthermore also not carried out (Gido):15
5The Balanced Score Card16
5.1The Balanced Score Card factors as follows (http://www.businessballs.com/balanced_scorecard.htm)16
6Recommendation18
6.1Remedying of the current situation19
6.2STRATEGIC PLANNING19
7Conclusion23
8Bibliography24

Executive Summary
The SWOT analysis conducted on the current situation at Parks Corporation, in terms of the Blue Spider Project, revealed that there exist a lack of leadership skills, a lack of internal processes, lack of delegation skills, lack of communication skills and a lack of team effectiveness. The main causes identified for these problems were a lack in leading, creating, implementing and improving functions. The result of these issues was that the current matrix function is dysfunctional and the value system seems inefficient. Poor communication and a lack in customer driven perspective were highlighted. To correct the situation, the focus should be on correcting the problem areas identified in the SWOT analysis, under weaknesses and threats. It will therefore be part of the recommendation that serious attention be placed on strategic planning, utilizing the balanced score card. In addition to the leadership skills that will be mentioned throughout the evaluation of the case study, internal processes, learning and growth within Parks Corporation, financial processes and customer factors will be highlighted. This will result in a balanced matrix organizational structure as per figure 1 and areas of strategic importance will be focused on. Parks Corporation will have to take a risk management approach and it must be determined what their core business is. Once this decision has been made, the company will have to analyze if they are geared to deliver accordingly. Bad project management and communication are adding to the factors that will ensure the failure of a project and caution must be taken when putting people into the functions as stipulated in the matrix structure.

Introduction
Parks Corporation is an engineering company that used to specialize in the R&D (research and develop) business. The company expanded rapidly but had to lay-off employees during the late sixties due to the recession. Furthermore, Parks Corporation decided to change its area of specialty to compete as a low-cost production facility. The company did not however amend their vision, mission and strategic objectives, which set Parks Corporation up for failure in terms of future projects that might have been awarded to them.

It is clear that although Parks Corporation made the decision to apply the matrix organizational structure, change management did not take place and people with the wrong skills are being placed in the wrong positions.

According to (Kuprenas*), research has shown that successful implementation of a matrix structure in any form of organization can be...
tracking img