Preview

blind truth movie

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
543 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
blind truth movie
In the movie, Blind Faith, a black boy, Charlie Jr, is accused of strangling to death a white Irish boy and gets caught up in the legal system of the pre-civil rights era. John Williams, Charlie’s uncle is a lawyer who takes a leap of Blind Faith on Charlie’s case. Uncle John took Charlie’s case not just knowing the odds against them, given the circumstances of racism during this time, but knowing Charlie had already given a signed confession to the police department. Uncle John insists that his nephew is not a murderer. Uncle John has given blind faith in Charlie. Uncle John knew he was a sweet boy who got good grades and had never been in trouble before, so how could it be possible that this is true? Charlie Jr’s father, Charlie Sr. is a cop, a cop with potential to be the first black sergeant in all of New York. Charlie Sr. and his wife seem to be devastated over what has happened and wanted only but the best lawyer for their son. But because of the racism not any other lawyer besides Uncle John would pursue Charlie’s case and Uncle John promised that Charlie would not get the death penalty and that he would not die. I feel that in the beginning of the movie Charlie Sr. and his wife took a leap of blind faith in John Williams regardless of the fact that Uncle John was an aspiring real estate lawyer and wanted nothing to do with criminal law. As I was saying before the 1950s was a time of pre-civil rights. Which means there was still segregation in “black people” and “white people”. But what is failed to mention is that in the 1950s, also, homosexuals were segregated. Actually, in the 1950s homosexuality was considered a disease, not like who it is accepted today, as it is not a disease but a freedom of choice. Charlie was a black boy, but he was a homosexual black boy, who did not want to tarnish his family name, for his fathers chance of being “one of them” would non-existent. I believe that Charlie Jr. also took a leap of blind faith. Blind Faith is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The beginning of this story starts off with Grant describing how he thought the trail from what he’s heard from the others. The Judge, the lawyers and entire jury was white, Jefferson didn't have a chance against them. Even his lawyer didn't use actual evidence to prove his innocence, he called him a fool. His lawyer also said…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are many significant views and values that Reginald Rose demonstrates in 12 Angry Men the most important one being that prejudice constantly affects the truth and peoples judgement. As the jurors argue between themselves as to whether a young boy is guilty of stabbing his father it is shown that “It’s very hard to keep personal prejudice out of a thing like this.” This is most evident in the way juror #3 and juror #10 come to their decision that the young man is guilty as they bring in there prejudice against young people and people from the slums to make their judgement without considering the facts of the case. Rose uses juror #8 who can see the whole trial because he is calm, reasonable and brings no prejudice as a prime example of what a juror is supposed to be like.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Darryl Hunt is an African American born in 1965 in North Carolina. In 1984, he was convicted wrongfully of rape and murder of Deborah Sykes, a young white woman working as a newspaper editor. This paper researches oh his wrongful conviction in North Carolina. Darryl Hunt served nineteen and a half years before DNA evidence exonerated him. The charges leveled against him were because of inconsistencies in the initial stages of the case. An all-white bench convicted the then nineteen-year-old Hunt, even though there was no physical evidence linking him to the crime. A hotel employee made false claims that he saw Hunt enter the hotel bathroom, and later emerge with bloodstained towels. Other witnesses also fixed Hunt to the case. While sexual assault was central to the case, in 1994 DNA testing cleared him of involvement in the case, throwing the whole case into question.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harper Lee, the author of "To Kill a Mockingbird," left behind a massive legacy. Her book sold more than 40 million copies since it was published in 1960, and Americans rank it among the most influential books they've read. But after more than 50 years and millions of classrooms lessons, some of its central lessons still, at least at times, go unheard. the same racial prejudices that led to Robinson's conviction are thriving, if in more subtle ways, in courtrooms today. It is not unknown that black defendants are more likely to be convicted of crimes than white defendants, and that people found guilty of murdering white victims are significantly more likely to be sentenced to death than those who murder blacks. Defendants with more stereotypically…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    So much hardship came to him, just for his sexuality. Have you ever heard of the town of Rosewood? In 1923, the town of Rosewood, Florida was rampaged, when a mob of white men were looking for a black convict accused with molestation. However, when they weren’t successful in finding him, they killed eight people, that we know of, and burned all the houses, churches, stores, and the school, to the ground. Consequently, wiping a whole town off the map just because the residents were black.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    he is black. This shows how blacks were abused for no reason by many members of the…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scottsboro trials occurred in the 1930s and had nine African American boys aging from thirteen to seventeen and they were accused of raping two girls on a train. Eight of the nine boys were sentenced to death and one of them was too young for the death penalty so he was sentenced to life in prison. There was a lot of evidence that pointed to them being innocent. Like the two girls were examined by a doctor and he found no evidence of rape, but he was not called to court, but he told a lot of people. Also they found out the girls were prostitutes and they were crossing a border illegally so they covered it up saying they were raped. Later on, during the case one of the girls admitted that she was never raped. Also the boys were not in the same train cart as the girls (Johnson). The Scottsboro trials are a lot like Tom Robinson’s trial in To Kill a Mockingbird. The cases are a lot alike, because they both took place during the Great Depression and they both are rape cases. Also the towns took the white person’s side instead of the African Americans sides (Johnson). That is why the Scottsboro trials are like the trials in To Kill a…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Family Movie

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mrs. Doubtfire is a movie about something that almost every American family faces, divorce. The film stars Sally Field and Robin Williams as parents with conflicting parenting styles and beliefs, who end up divorcing with a bloody battle for the children’s custody. The children are thrown into this mess and the movie showcases how each of them deal with the divorce. Lydia is the rebellious preteen who doesn’t understand why the family dynamic has to change. Chris, the younger brother is the athletic member of the family. Natalie is the small wide eyed child who is still trying to comprehend why daddy doesn’t live at home anymore.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scottsboro Trial

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Scottsboro boys were all accused of raping two white women when they actually were just riding a freight train. They had one of the best criminal lawyers at that time period, but didn’t win the tedious case. The boys and lawyers fought hard to win, but there were many barriers in the way. The barriers included a bias based on their skin color and their handicapped appearance. When the boys were put to trial, the world was in a state of extreme racial turmoil. Many were for racism; however, many were opposed to the idea. Everyone on the case was narrow-minded, which was very unfortunate for the boys. The fact that the boys were Negroes gave them a disadvantage at actually winning the case. That was very unfair because regardless of their color, they were still innocent. Also, the 12 jurors from the case, which included everyday people, were all white. Equally important, the Scottsboro boys had gone against an all-white jury in the trial, which was a violation of their right of equal protection under law. On the other hand, the boys didn’t have a great physical appearance. For instance, one of the boys, Willie Robeson had suffered from syphilis and Olin Montgomery was nearly blind. Their outer appearance was used as an excuse in court, that they “looked” like rapists. That was also a detriment towards the defense. Even though, the boys had Leibowitz, one of the best lawyers at the time, they lost the case. All…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Essay

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The first key idea, and probably the most important, is that the boy was poor and couldn’t afford a decent attorney. He had a court appointed attorney who probably had many other cases to argue. This attorney had no attachment to the client; there was no glory that the attorney could look towards. The attorney would really have to believe in the client in order to deliberate the case properly. It was pointed out in the movie that the boy had a very poor attorney and didn’t ask the right questions. If the boy had a good attorney, he would have brought up all the points that countered the key evidence that some of the jurors pointed out.…

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The twelfth juror did not use his own group’s way of doing things as a yardstick for judging others. He put himself in the boy’s shoes by taking everything into consideration and the other men did not start to do this until the end of the movie. One of the men brought up a point that just because he grew up in the slums doesn’t mean he murdered his father. He spoke from his personal experiences. But the twelfth juror added, “I kept putting myself in the kid’s place.” This is important because his way of looking at the case was fine. The man stood firm on his vote until the boy was proved with facts to be guilty. He showed cultural relativism because he realized he must…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Time to Kill

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Similarly, in 12 Angry Men racial prejudice towards the Latino boy was also apparent. At one point of time it seemed like the Latino boy would be executed, because nearly everyone would have found him guilty. It was stated that “So far eleven jurors are predisposed to convict him of the murder charges, only one juror, Mr. Davis believed his innocence.” If the jury system was not based on unanimous consent, then the Latino boy would have died. This is simply due to racial prejudice and it is purely unjust. In a court of law, the jury is the fact finder and not a social commentator. Similarly, most of the jurors in A Time to Kill were inclined to convict Carl Lee, because the film showed several scenes where the jury was discussing the case and a show of hands in regards to a guilty verdict was requested and most lifted their hand. This is very similar to 12 Angry Men where the race determines innocence or guilt. Justice in both cases was nearly decided on the color of…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    V For Vendetta

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Canada, we are privileged to have a lot of rights that benefit us. In the movie, V for Vendetta they are not as fortunate as we are. There are many examples to prove that they didn’t have many rights as we do.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A court is only as sound as its jury, and a jury is only as sound as the men who make it up. For I had done all I could and all I could do now was wait, for Tom's fate was in the hands of the jury. The old court - house clock struck the hour. The jury had reached the foregone conclusion of a guilty verdict. I had taken Tom Robinson's case, but in the heart of the town it was never a real case, or simply one that could never do justice. The only thing we had was a black man’s word against the Ewells‘. The evidence boiled down to you - did — I - didn’t. Tom Robinson's trial was a fate already predetermined, but simply because we never had a chance before we started was no reason for us not to try to win — for that is what real courage is. For the irrationality of adult attitudes to race and class is not something that can be taken so leniently — as to extend so far at the expense of human life. For me, Tom's trial meant more than the fate of a single man. The case was about the fairness of the American legal system, which in turn was about the impartiality of American people — which…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prejudice: There are many significant views and values that Reginald Rose demonstrates in 12 Angry Men the most important one being that prejudice constantly affects the truth and peoples judgement. As the jurors argue between themselves as to whether a young boy is guilty of stabbing his father it is shown that “It’s very hard to keep personal prejudice out of a thing like this.” This is most evident in the way juror #3 and juror #10 come to their decision that the young man is guilty as they bring in there prejudice against young people and people from the slums to make their judgement without considering the facts of the case. Rose uses juror #8 who can see the whole trial because he is calm, reasonable and brings no prejudice as a prime example of what a juror is supposed to be like.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays