May 15, 2013
Biological and Chemical Outline
Biological and chemical warfare has been around since the beginning of time. From poison tipped arrows to purposely transmitting smallpox to individuals. There has been ongoing political conflict on biological and chemical warfare for quite some time for legitimate reasons too. Biological and chemical warfare is very deadly and sometimes inhumane, but on the other hand it is very cost efficient and is very effective at doing its job. Biological and chemical warfare is also good for the country or individual using it because their is no loss of life or huge amounts of people dieing to kill others only one side dies. Biological and chemical warfare is a safe and cost effective alternative to modern warfare. Some history of early uses of BCW in war time. During the 6th century BC, the Assyrians poisoned enemy wells with a fungus that would harm the enemy. In 184 BC, Hannibal had clay pots filled with venomous snakes and told his soldiers to throw the pots at Pergamene ships. Historical accounts from medieval Europe show the use of dead infected animal bodies, by Mongols, Turks and other groups, to infect enemy water supplies. In 1346, the bodies of Mongol warriors of the Golden Horde who had died of plague were thrown over the walls of the city of Kaffa. It has been said that this operation may have been responsible for the start of the Black Death in Europe. The last known incident of using plague corpses for BCW purposes occurred in 1710, when Russian forces attacked the Swedish by flinging plague-infected corpses over the city walls of Reval. It has been argued that rational people would never use biological weapons offensively. “Allied efforts in Canada, the United States, and Britain to develop anthrax-based weapons were also active in World War II. During World War II, Britain actually produced five million anthrax cakes at the U.K. Chemical and Biological Defense Establishment at Porton Down facility that were intended to be dropped on Germany to infect the food chain” (Ed K. Lee Lerner and Brenda Wilmoth Lerner). The argument is that biological weapons cannot be controlled: the weapon could malfunction and hurt the offensive side,maybe having even worse effects than on the target. An agent like smallpox or other airborne viruses would spread worldwide and ultimately infect the user's home country. However, this argument does not really apply to bacteria. For example, anthrax can easily be controlled and even created in a garden shed. Also, bacteria can be suitably modified to be effective in only a narrow environmental range, the range of the target that differs from the army on the offensive. Thus only the target might be affected adversely. The weapon may be further used to harm or degrade an advancing army making them more vulnerable to counterattack by the defending force. BCW is funded by two main sources the government and taxpayers. Basically its only the government because they use taxpayer money to fund it. The government owns all of the land and real estate for the labs and storage for the facilities. “After bioterrorist attacks on the U.S. government in 2001, Biological and chemical agent funding has gone up over 4000% and still is one of the most funded bacteria agents in public health today” (Gale Encyclopedia of Science). These acts were also brought to the publics attention and then the people also voted for more research and defense against these harmful bacterias. Scientist have discovered many new substances and created new technology to prevent bioterrorism to affect our government officials again. The problem now is catching the actual terrorist who are using these agents. Synthetic biological warfare is commonly classified as Chemical...