The Fifth Amendment rights’ against self-incrimination allows an individual to refuse to disclose information that could be used against him or her in a criminal prosecution. This amendment allows an individual to “plead the Fifth” which is a refusal to answer questions that can be considered self-incriminating. (en.wikipedia.org/Fifth Amendment/self-incrimination)
In comparison to the Fifth Amendment Right there is the Miranda v.`Arizona case which allows statements given during an interrogation by a defendant in police custody to be admissible at trial if proven the defendant was informed of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning, and of the right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police, and that the defendant not only understood these rights, but voluntarily waived them.( wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirandav.Arizona) There was lot of controversy regarding the phrasing of this case which requires you to physically invoke your right to answer questions and/or sign a waiver that you understand those rights. Mr.... [continues]
Cite This Essay
(2011, 03). Berghuis V. Thompkins. StudyMode.com. Retrieved 03, 2011, from http://www.studymode.com/essays/Berghuis-v-Thompkins-646450.html
"Berghuis V. Thompkins" StudyMode.com. 03 2011. 2011. 03 2011 <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Berghuis-v-Thompkins-646450.html>.
- MLA 7
"Berghuis V. Thompkins." StudyMode.com. StudyMode.com, 03 2011. Web. 03 2011. <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Berghuis-v-Thompkins-646450.html>.
"Berghuis V. Thompkins." StudyMode.com. 03, 2011. Accessed 03, 2011. http://www.studymode.com/essays/Berghuis-v-Thompkins-646450.html.