Preview

Beneficence and Fiduciary Relationships

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1277 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Beneficence and Fiduciary Relationships
May 8, 2012
Beneficence in Medical Ethics The principle of beneficence is found in the Hippocratic Oath, which provides that “physicians will apply dietetic measures for the benefit of the sick according to (their) ability and judgment; and to keep the sick from harm and injustice.” (Jonathan F. Will, 2011) Our textbook claims that the Hippocratic Oath expresses an obligation of nonmaleficence and an obligation of beneficence: “I will use treatment to help the sick according to my ability and judgment, but I will never use it to injure or wrong them.” (Beauchamp & Childress, 2009) Beneficence is broken down into two parts: “positive beneficence” which is an obligation to contribute to the welfare of others and “utility” which is an obligation to produce the greatest overall benefit to the greatest number of people. Beneficence is partial; therefore, general beneficence is ideal, impartial, and specific beneficence, which is obligatory and impartial. The text claims that beneficence is the heart of healthcare. Paternalism, a form of beneficence which is in conflict with autonomy, is defined as the intentional overriding of one person’s preferences or actions by another person, where the person who overrides justifies this action by appeal to the goal of benefiting or of preventing or mitigating harm to the person whose preferences or actions are overridden. It does not prejudge whether the beneficent act is justified, obligatory, or misplaced. It further divides paternalism into soft or hard paternalism. Distinguishing between them results in a discussion of autonomy and whether it can be justified in relation to this or not. The use of several cost benefit tools and evaluations are “considered somewhat morally required to enhance our ability to make reasoned assessments of health related policies and to maximize beneficent outcomes.” (Beauchamp & Childress, 2009, p. 221) Moral problems surround the use of these tools.



References: Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc. Jonathan F. Will, J. (2011). A Brief Historical and Theoretical Perspective on Patient Autonomy and Medical Decision Making. CHEST, 669-673. Sutrop, M. (2011). Viewpoint:How to avoid a dichotomy between autonomy and beneficence: fromliberalismto. Journal of Internal Medicine, 370-382. Tauber, A. I. (2003). Sick Autonomy. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 484-95. Wikipedia. (2012, May 7). John Stuart Mill. Retrieved from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Stuart_Mill

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    DignityL2 4

    • 1928 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Encouraging independence and freedom of action is an important part of providing good quality of care and of supporting a person`s autonomy. Restrictions that limit these freedoms may have an adverse effect both on the person`s autonomy and on their…

    • 1928 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    We all enjoy our right to autonomy, the freedom to express what can be done to us, the right for self-determination. “Autonomy is based on a person’s ability make rational choices concerning their own life and choose for themselves. They must be treated with respect without interfering with their ability to determine their own paths and make decisions for oneself” (Vaughn 9). The freedom of autonomy gives patients the right decide their healthcare decisions without the influence of the values of their physicians, their colleagues, or society (Schwartz 105).…

    • 818 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An important consideration which must be explained before any such questions can be answered is the distinction between medical justice and social justice. The sphere of medical justice involves the decisions doctors must make about providing medical care to those in need, while the sphere of social justice involves the allocation of resources by society those those in need. For doctors, medical justice makes answering the above questions relatively straightforward: they are obligated to provide medical care to those in need regardless of moral worth, dollar costs, or social status. Thus, doctors are ideally obligated by medical justice to provide the same level of medical care to other human beings regardless of any non-medical considerations. Social justice, however, requires different conclusions because society is required to make decisions that do include non-medical considerations. This means that while medical justice may require a question be answered one way, the larger sphere of social justice could lead to a different answer entirely.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HCM 420 Mastery Exercises

    • 2182 Words
    • 8 Pages

    6. True or false? Beneficence is a principle of ethics that assumes that the healthcare professional is there for the benefit of the patient and will act with kindness.…

    • 2182 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A. It seems that recently, the healthcare system has been placing labels on the values of lives. Doctors, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies are separating patients on the sole bases of their finances. In these situations, individuals with health insurance are receiving priority care over those without health insurance. Doctors and hospitals are increasing waiting times of those without insurance, to take advantage of those with insurance. In addition to doubled-waiting times, these uninsured patients are even forced to take lower grades of medication. This isn’t only unfair, but inhumane, displaying the belief that these charity care patients’ lives aren’t as valuable as those with insurance. These actions seem ironic in a nation that believes in equal rights. Placing a price or level of importance on a human being’s life is heartless, greedy, and hypocritical. To reckon the significance of a person’s life due to their ability to pay hospital their medical bills…(to be continued).…

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To fully combine the ethical troubles of the public health in the field of public health while at the same time into the field of the bioethics (Lindert & Potter, 2015).” The focus of the population is imperative because it allows awareness of prevention and control. Medical ethics is also imperative because it concerns more with the essentials of an individual and their outcomes (Boylan, M,…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “four principles of biomedical ethics of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice” (Cooper, 2012), however, this case shows autonomy, beneficence and non-maleficence clashing. The patient and her family have the right to determine the patient’s care; yet, following the patient’s mother’s decision has the potential of causing harm to the…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Autonomy is integral to health care; however, promoting and sustaining patient autonomy may be more difficult to enact than is often suggested. According to Hewitt-Taylor (2004), the concept of autonomy becomes more complex when the patient is a child, or an adult who has learning disabilities or a mental health problem that might be considered to impinge on their ability to make informed decisions. An adult with a mental health problem, who is unable to function autonomously has to rely on their caregivers and POAs for their care. In situations like this, health care staff need to be aware of the legal as well as moral and ethical issues involved when facilitating autonomous choices for their patients (Edgar, et al., 2001). The distinction…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Beauchamp and Childress. (2002). Ethics of Care. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Retrieved August 22, 2009 from http://caae.phil.cmu.edu/cavalier/80130/part2/II_7.html…

    • 3255 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    suffering or stem from an understanding of the duty to respect patient autonomy. Positions in…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mathews, S., & Pronovost, P. (2008). Physician’s autonomy and informed decision making. JAMA, 300(24), 2913-2915.…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A Right to Healthcare?

    • 2298 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Beauchamp, T.; Walters, L. Contemporary issues in Bioethics, 6th edition, Pt. 2,Justice in Access to Health Care…

    • 2298 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States has the most expensive health care system in the world and some 45 million Americans are uninsured under the current health care system, and these numbers continue to grow. However with universal health care coverage everyone could enjoy equal access to health care, as a right afforded to them as American citizens. In a country as wealthy as the United States, there is no justifiable reason why Americans should go without health care and/or die needlessly due to lack of health insurance coverage. In this paper I will explore several reasons why our nation is uninsured and how using the utilitarianism approach of a single-payer system will solve this ethical problem within our society. Next I will apply the contrasting view of the ethical egoism perspective regarding health care as right to all citizens in America. Finally I will choose between the utilitarianism and the ethical egoism perspective to revel which of the two is closest to my own views regarding this emotionally charged ethical issue.…

    • 3650 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his essay, The Refutation of Medical Paternalism, Alan Goldman states his argument against a strong doctor-patient role differentiation, in which the doctor may act against a patients’ immediate will in order to carry treatment in the patients’ best interest. Goldman frames his entire argument around the single assumption that a person’s freedom to decide his future is the most important and fundamental right as he claims “the autonomous individual is the source of those other goods he enjoys, and so is not to be sacrificed for the sake of them.”[1] He claims that the majority of people would agree that they are the best judges of their own self-interest and that there is innate value in the freedom to determine one’s own future. On this foundation, he begins by describing the criteria under which paternalism might be justified.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The term euthanasia originated from the Greek word for "good death." It is the act or practice of ending the life of a person either by lethal injection or the deferment of medical treatment (Munson, 2012, p. 578). Many view euthanasia as simply bringing relief by alleviating pain and suffering. Euthanasia has been a long-standing ethical debate for decades in the United States. Active euthanasia is only legal in the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg. Assisted suicide is legal in Switzerland and in the United States in the states of Washington, Oregon and Montana (Angell). Several surveys indicate that roughly two thirds of the American public now support physician-assisted suicide, and more than half the doctors in the United States do too (Angell). Active voluntary and nonvoluntary euthanasia matter because they allow the patient or family to relieve them of pain and suffering, and to die with dignity and respect. In this paper I will argue that it is immoral and unethical to deny a patient the right to die and that active voluntary and nonvoluntary euthanasia should be a legal practice in the United States.…

    • 2255 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays