Preview

Battle of Salamis and Xerxes Military Decision

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1666 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Battle of Salamis and Xerxes Military Decision
To what extent is Xerxes misinterpreted in both ancient and modern sources?

Throughout history, it has been claimed by many that Xerxes, the fourth Persian king of the Great Achaemenid dynasty, was a cruel and intolerant leader, whose actions were more than questionable. However, in a time when Persian and Greek hostilities were quite extreme, due to Xerxes’ military decision to acquire Greece, there were few written sources which were not composed by his opposition or heavily influenced by the bitter relationship. Despite accounts, by composers such as Herodotus and Aeschylus, there has been recent attempt to consider both ancient and modern sources to balance his image. In the endeavor to reevaluate a reign that has much maligned throughout history and to reconsider a personality who has been at the mercy of those who write prejudicially about him, it is seen that Xerxes was in fact, a level-headed and impartial leader who reigned successfully, despite his loss of a hardly decisive war in Greece.

In evaluating Xerxes’ reign, it is essential to consider the accounts of his contemporaries in order to acquire a first hand portrayal of his actions which have traditionally established his character as one who was incapacitated with power. Herodotus, most infamously referred to throughout history as the “father of lies”, is a ancient Greek writer responsible for the account ‘The Histories’, which chronologically details Xerxes’ kinship and his failed endeavours at the expansion of the Persian empire into Greece.1 As he colourfully recounts Xerxes’ personal conversations, the supposed insanity of his predecessors and his reaction to failed attempts in bettering his empire, Herodotus, who is criticised for being considerably riddled with bias against the Persians, establishes this most inaccurate, yet permanent, portrayal of the Great King. In his Histories, Herodotus explicitly writes of Xerxes, although never having personally encountered one another, as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Herodotus was an ancient historian born just after the reign of Xerxes. In his book The Histories, Herodotus doesn’t attack Xerxes but describes him in two ways. Firstly, a typical King whose subjects feared him and secondly, a ruler punished by the gods for his arrogant use of power. Herodotus uses the bridging of Hellespont and destroying the Greek temples as examples of Xerxes arrogance. Herodotus also writes about instances of Xerxes being short tempered. Examples of this are:…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay 1

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the essay Herodotus: Xerxes Invades Greece, from The Histories, Herodotus was a very famous historian, who gave his account of the battle of Thermopylae. It is significant though to recognize that Herodotus was Greek and giving an account of what happened when the Persians defeated them. In the text Xerxes has many incidents that portray him as superstitious and tyrannical. Some examples of Xerxes’ tyranny is his plans to “march an army through Europe against Greece,” his want to not rest until he has taken and burnt Athens, wants to extend the Persian territory throughout all of Europe, his beheading of his master- builders, and his lack of mercy towards his slave and his five sons. Xerxes shows his superstitions when he sends for the Magians to tell him why the sun has disappeared, and the day has so quickly tuned to night. Turning to the actions in battle, those of the Spartans tell me that they are a strong willed people who do not give up easily, if at all, even when faced with a great challenge and are outnumbered. Besides this essay showing the Greeks strong will, this essay seems to promote their use of wit and skill in tricking the Persians into thinking there were less of them than there actually was. The account was written by a Greek, so the information in the story would cast them in a more positive light. Lastly, in our text, Western Civilization, there is a thurough evaluation of the significance of the Persian invasions on the Greek political and intellectual…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Odysseus, the ruler of the island kingdom of Ithaca, was known by all for his cleverness and cunning, but what I noticed throughout my readings of Odysseus is that he is also shows some weaknesses at times. I will discuss examples of each of these prevalent traits throughout this essay.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Odysseus: Hero or Villain

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lizeth Marin Honors Introduction to Literature Period 3 18 April 2008 Odysseus: Hero or Villain? Heading home, to Ithaca, Odysseus is faced upon many obstacles that he and his men try to overcome, but in the end substantiate that Odysseus is a villain. “The old soldier in despair: He has spent ten years (seven of them as Calypso’s not entirely unwillingly captive) trying to get home” (652, summary). Evidence proves that Odysseus is a villain, because he tries to convince that he was kept unwillingly by Calypso. However, it is true that Odysseus was kept as Calypso’s captive for a time. Yet he can still be judged as a villain, because he does not just stay as a prisoner, no, he assists Calypso by being with her for the pleasures that she offers to him. Of course that Odysseus never says no to that, which reveals his true and voracious side.”As Circe of Aeaea, the enchantress, desired me, and detained me in her hall. But in my heart I never gave my consent” (656,141-143). This quote once again proves Odysseus to be a villain. This could be argued and said that Odysseus was only taking precautions so that he would not get killed or so that Circe would not release her rage at him in some sort of way. However, with Circe he could have left whenever he wanted unlike when he was with Calypso. Odysseus continues his journey, though he is retained by many obstacles, but only proves that his felony is even stronger than what could have ever been imagined. Odysseus once again through his action proves himself worthy of being known as a villain. Bitten by curiosity, Odysseus proposes to go see the Cyclops’s cave and insists on waiting for him (660, summary). His action leads him and his men to danger. Odysseus after his encounter with Polyphemus, a Cyclops and Poseidon’s monstrous son, is captured along with his men. Odysseus outsmarts the Cyclops and saves some of his men, but it still leaves him as the person responsible for the felony that his men commit to Cyclops…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Legacy of Xerxes

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The European Greek tradition is however scathing of Xerxes capabilities as a king claiming he did not have the personality, temperament, or judgment to be a great king/leader.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is much scholarly debate on Xerxes’ rise to prominence due to the contradictory nature of primary sources; both archaeological and epigraphic, particularly regarding challenges to the throne. The political system was particularly murky in the area of succession; with no clear rules established by the time of Xerxes. Herodotus, as the focal primary source for Xerxes’ rise to prominence; must be indefinitely treated with due caution, given his Greek heritage, tendency to caricature the Persians, and overplay their power in order to increase the ‘underdog’ nature of the Greeks. There are various factors to be considered in Xerxes’ rise to power; particularly other claimants to the throne; most notably Artobazanes. However, Xerxes held greater claim to the throne due to genetic links, and public approval.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Xerxes’ kingship after Darius was from 426BC to 465BC, his accession being a decision finalised by the previous king from a number of factors as evident in inscriptions, reliefs as well as accounts by the Greek historian, Herodotus. It was not straightforward that Xerxes’ would succeed his father, and the sources provide dates and insight that factor out possibilities which may have resulted in Darius’ final decision.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ancient Greece had many ups and downs in its very long history. As a growing civilization, it earned numerous allies as well as enemies. One of these great enemies was the Persians. Although the Persians were very powerful adversaries, the Greeks defeated them and at that point, the era of classical Greece began. The Delian league, which was created to unite all states and protect them from intruders, had turned into an empire. This empire was governed by Athens. As peace and harmony was restored in Greece, the city of Athens was about to experience it’s greatest epoch. A time filled with power and great social and political wealth. All of which was the product of a great man’s work. His name was Pericles. Pericles was born in the year 495 B.C. into a very noble family. He was the nephew of Cleisthenes who founded Athenian Democracy. Pericles lived his whole life in a political environment. When he became involved in Athenian affairs, he received a very good reputation. In 462 B.C. he began to dominate the politics in Athens as a key leader in the democratic movement. Not only was he a great orator,…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Xerxes followed the same pattern of appointing a mixed government of local and Persian rulers and to grant local independence to the rulers. However, in his religious policies Xerxes differed from Darius. Darius was a strict follower of Zoroastrianism and constantly reminds the will and favour of Ahuramazda and Arta behind his every action. There is no evidence that Darius ever tried to force his beliefs on the people of his empire, and he is generally considered a generous ruler in the matters of religious freedom. On the other hand, Xerxes, in one of his inscriptions, says “… and in one of these countries, there places where false gods were worshipped. Afterward, with the favour of Ahuramazda, I destroyed the sanctuaries of the demons and I declared that demons should not be worshipped. Where before demons were worshipped, I worshipped Ahuramazda...” (Kent, XPh). This says this Xerxes was forcing his beliefs on part of his population. The Daevas inscription gave strong evidence that Xerxes was a follower of Zoroastrian teaching and the god Ahuramazda. Xerxes was against the Daevas, he had no tolerance towards people who worshiped…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The accounts of Scythia in Herodotus’ The Histories are organized in concurrence with the timeline of the Persian invasion of Scythia, led by King Darius, where as the invasion progresses Herodotus repeatedly digresses about the history of Scythia until the Persians and Scythians meet, at which point the apparent essence of the accounts of Scythia in The Histories, the Persian invasion, is concluded. Although Herodotus’ description of Scythia seems to be a byproduct of the accounts of King Darius, it is nonetheless thorough. Along with detailed descriptions of the origins of Scythia, as well as its diverse populace, Herodotus seems determined to write extensively on the geography of Scythia. Concerning the veracity of Herodotus’ accounts on Scythia, there is no effort to provide one point of view as fact, but instead he provides many possibilities and then gives input on which he believes to be most accurate. Because of this, there is little evidence supporting Herodotus having a Greek anti-”barbarian” bias. In fact, as Herodotus is considered by many to be the “proto-historian”, his work is not easily weighed against the efforts of those that followed. Rather, the stories Herodotus relates weaves a fuller more comprehensive picture of the time than later histories. This unschooled effort should not be construed to suggest a bias, but a rich and new writing style undiluted by the socratic method to follow in later years.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    History 102 Xenophon Essay

    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Xenophon believed in all of the rules Lycurgus set up which were, at the time, contrary to popular beliefs of those in the other Greek societies. For example, Lycurgus set up a food system in which people were only to take enough to survive. It states that they should “take only such a quantity as never to be oppressed with repletion, and not to be strangers to living somewhat frugally” so that they would be “more satisfied with any kind of food” (pg 84). I feel that this shows Xenophon as a warrior or strong willed because he believes that suffering in the end will bring good fortune. This is also shown in the document when he agrees with Lycurgus’ law that one should not wear shoes in order to toughen their feet so they can become stronger and more agile. As a liberalist with a strong warrior background, Xenophon celebrated the strength and intuitive creativity of the Spartan way of life. His attitudes toward all other nations were that they were weak; the way they were set up would not be beneficial to their…

    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During his reign there have been three recorded revolts and they are Egypt in 486BC, Babylon in 484BC, and Babylon again in 482BC. Egypt’s revolt in 486BC is recorded as very serious and occurred the same year that Darius had died. Xerxes inherited his father’s plan to add Greece to the Persian Empire, to…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Twelve Caesars

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In “Twelve Caesars”, Suetonius writes the anecdotal memoirs of the 12 kings of the Roman Empire, starting from Julius Caesar all the way till Domitian. His work is unparalleled in detail and is a rich primary source on the history of Rome. Suetonius writes a detailed memoir about each of the kings, outlining in vivid detail their actions, their lives, their accession to the seat of power and their deaths. There seems to be a general mix of virtue and vice in the character of these kings. Using the real life incidents occurring in their lives, Suetonius gives the reader an idea of the different good and bad qualities of these illustrious men as emperors. These kings exhibit qualities of being modest, just, doing public good, improving and repairing the building and infrastructure of the empire and improve the administration of the empire as well as vices of cruelty, incest, extravagance, decadence and vanity. In what follows, these qualities of what constitutes a good emperor and a bad emperor will be discussed with the help of Suetonius’ biographical memoirs in Twelve Caesars.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ozymandias was a powerful king, who ruled with an iron fist. Lines 4 and 5, “Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown”, “And wrinkled lip and sneer of cold command” shows that Ozymandias ruled with contempt, dominance and conceit. He was a very unhappy man, not forthcoming or humble in any way, as a true king should be. He was however, filled with pride and arrogance.…

    • 559 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout the life of Alexander of Macedon as portrayed in works such as Arrian, Plutarch and Curtius the question of Alexander’s divinity has always been a prominent debate. Alexander believed that he may have been descended from the Greek warrior Achilles on hid father side and Heracles on his Mother’s. It has been argued by historians that Alexander used his alleged divinity to his advantage in both politics and warfare. However, Alexander’s belief in his own divinity did not arise out of an ideological vacuum and in his age and area there was a religious climate that fostered such ideas. Nevertheless, there is strong evidence that by Alexander believing and promoting his divinity that he was granted great respect by both his friends and his enemies. The Persian army quickly became very demoralised and fearful when they learned that they were facing an army led by a God, if this were a part of Alexander’s tactics it was definitely an extremely beneficial tactic. Arrian is at times sceptical of Alexander’s belief in his own divinity but has no doubt that even if Alexander never intended to promote his own Legend it was a pivotal reason for Alexander’s successes in Persia.…

    • 2862 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays