Preview

Base and Superstructure

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1631 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Base and Superstructure
Base and superstructure
'In the social production of their life, men enter into definite relations that are indispensable and independent of their will, relations of production which correspond to a definite stage of development of their material productive forces. The sum total of these relations of production constitutes the economic structure of society, the real basis, on which rises a legal and political superstructure, and to which correspond definite forms of social consciousness' (1)
The above quote contains some of the most contentious points of Marxist theory; the exposition of the base/superstructure distinction and the clear use of functional explanation, capture the essence of the question. Modern scholars disagree over these two points: They ask, how appropriate is the base/superstructure distinction, and how valid is the use of functional explanation. Steven Lukes suggests that it is time to 'consign the distinction to the scrapheap'. In this essay, the authority of this condemnation shall be assessed, and it shall be found that it is still possible to salvage the distinction from the trashpile of social and historical theory.
First, some definitions. The base is made up of the relations of production in a society, which is above pointed out to be 'indispensable and independent' of the wills of the actors in these relations. The typical example used to describe relations of production is property relations. A capitalist economy functions due to the property relations which organise labour, capital and resources. This base 'corresponds' to a stage of the development of productive forces, or the level of technology. These productive forces are what determine the relations of production, and thus the economic base. If technology proceeds to the extent that production is hampered due to the relations of production, then the economic structure must change. The superstructure is the set of 'non-economic institutions whose character is explained

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    * Marx: “Social class is fundamentally determined by one’s relationship to the means of production.”…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism shares in common with functionalism the macro structural approach to society, looking at it as a whole, however a key difference between the two theories is that marxism is a conflict perspective, that is the conflict of class between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat also known as the ruling and working classes. The work of Karl Marx in the mid 1800s constitutes the main body of this conflict theory, he wrote that the central institution of capitalist society is private property, the system by which capital (money, machines, factories and other material objects) is controlled by a small minority of the population, leading to opposed classes i.e. the bourgeoisie and the proletariat (Cohen 1978). Marxists believe that society is based on ascribed status which is given by birth or family background, therefore the bourgeoisie pass down their land and properties to their children, keeping the wealth in the…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    sosc1140 essay 2

    • 1294 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Capitalism is the most productive economic system that ever exists. Its emergence and development have brought an amazingly rapid increase in productivity. However, the fact that cyclical capitalist economic crisis arises proves that capitalism does not make sense because it has contradictions in it. In this article, I am going to provide explanations about what Engels means by historical materialism, the fundamental contradiction in capitalism and two other contradictions that arise from this contradiction. And I will conclude by explaining Engels’ s anticipation of the eventual outcome of the historical development of capitalism. My main argument is that the fundamental contradiction in capitalism is the contradiction between social production and individual appropriation which leads to the contradiction between the systematic organization of production inside factories and the disorganization of production in society as a whole and the contradiction between the mode of production and the mode of exchange, and the contradiction between market and production (Frederick 295; Frederick 299; Frederick 302).…

    • 1294 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to him matter determines everything. Alongside this, author claims, means of production and relation between productive forces constitutes economic structure of society, and this is the real foundation on which superstructure rise. Superstructure includes law, morality, philosophy, political theories, forms of government, religion, art and culture. Marx asserts, it is the social being which determines consciousness. He further says legal and political superstructure (and corresponding forms of social consciousness) arises out of the economic structure of society; that mode of production of material life conditions social, political and intellectual life; and the consciousness does not define the way we work together socially, but rather the…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meaning of Life

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In order to carry out production and exchange, people have to enter into very definite social relations, most fundamentally production relations.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Marxists helped contribute to our understanding of the role of education in society in many ways. They went against the functionalists and even opposed one of the functionalist’s theories.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “With the increasing value of the world of things proceeds in direct proportion the devaluation of the world of men. Labour produces not only commodities; it produces itself and the worker as a commodity” (p. 32). He shrinks in comparison to the world of objects that he created but belong to capitalism.…

    • 2988 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. This relates to the previous reading by going into deeper detail about the outcomes of Marxism by also comparing to social constructivism, clarifying that a nation’s environment in which it acts, is social, ideational, and…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social structure and social interaction are the building blocks of present life. The need for people to interact with each other is crucial and has always been the key action to survive and sustain existence. Sociologists now refer to this as socialisation, to establish the important components of living and a person’s social identity. Social structure is more important than social interaction in shaping individual social identity, the reason for this to have more importance in shaping someone’s social identity, is because without social structure there would be no social interaction both are important in discussing macrosociology (social structure) and microsociology (social interaction). Within social structure is class, status and institutions they will be expanded upon later in detail on the way they influence one social identity more then social interaction.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 is a compilation of thoughts regarding German economic and political concerns. Karl Marx conceives capitalist society’s responsible for the estrangement of the laborer. The capitalist mode of production ensures that man’s labor necessarily restricts him from acting in accordance with his humanity. The theory of capitalism diverts him, in the sense that it provides false hope for betterment, while the structure of capitalism, in coercing him to fluctuate his priorities away from that of an autonomous social being towards that of a collective individual, debases man’s special bond to his species- what is self-contradictory is it asks him to abandon his deepest bond to humanity, while at the same time offering him the hope of becoming a better social being. As a result of this contradiction, Marx affirm, man’s labor alienates him from himself and from his species. Yet I am here to argue, although man may feel alienated from himself and product of work, man has the choice, option to free himself from notions of capital enslavement. Within this essay, I will define estrangement of labor and the four main dimensions of alienation, evident in a capitalist society. I will discuss how alienated labor comes about as a result of capitalism and why said labor is not socially commend. Furthermore, I will elucidate on what non-alienated labor would be like, compared to alienated labor, in a capitalist society. Ultimately, I will annotate why Marx’s critique of capitalism is unfound and how labor under capitalism is in fact, engaging.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    economic, political, or social means. (Anand & Sen, 2000) The origins of the concept of…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Socl 100 Exam 1 Notes

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “Human action is largely determined by the groups which people belong to (social relationships) and by the societies they live in (social arrangements).”…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Message To Garcia

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The author wields statements that define the feelings of a time while hurling that time into the future. He identified the key deficiency in his society but does it on the level of the individual. And it happens that his problem of the times is our problem of the times, and it may be the problem of every time. But the solution is attainable, within us. “This incapacity for independent action, this moral stupidity, this infirmity of the will, this unwillingness to cheerfully catch hold and lift – these are the things that put pure Socialism so far into the future. If men will not act for themselves what will they do when the benefit of their effort is for all?”…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Base and superstructure are two concepts developed by Karl Marx. According to Nengwekhulu (s.a.) these two concepts must have a dialectical relationship, thus they can influence one another. The base refers to the economic factors in society such as the relations of production that includes the mode and means of production. It includes aspects such as raw materials, technology and capital. The superstructure can…

    • 2909 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays