Preview

Axiata Jakarta XL Axis Capital Group Telekom Indonesia-Axiata

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
647 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Axiata Jakarta XL Axis Capital Group Telekom Indonesia-Axiata
Axiata Jakarta XL Axis Capital Group Telekom Indonesia-Axiata unit to sell 3,500 towers to Solusi Tunas in RM1.5bil deal
PETALING JAYA: Axiata Group Bhd’s Indonesian unit, PT XL Axiata Tbk, has picked PT Solusi Tunas
Pratama Tbk (STP) over 14 others to sell a portion of its towers in a deal worth US$460mil
(RM1.5bil), or 5.6 trillion rupiah, cash.
XL Axiata is selling 3,500 of its 8,000 towers in a deal signed yesterday. There are no immediate plans to sell more towers, however.
“We have not taken any decision with regard to the remaining towers,” XL Axiata vice-president of corporate communications Turina Farouk said from Jakarta in replies to queries from StarBiz.
Earlier, XL Axiata had been contemplating a flotation exercise of its tower business, but later opted to sell a portion of the towers to raise cash to pare down debts that had increased after it bought PT
Axis Telekom Indonesia in March for US$865mil (RM2.82bil).
Sources said that of the 15 interested bidders for the towers, only STP was prepared to see through the process.
The others were not comfortable with the terms of the bidding process.
“All the main players were not comfortable with the terms of the bid ... some may question why the bid was not aborted since there was only one serious bidder,” said an industry player.
Turina said they had a process where the bidders had been short-listed from more than 15.
“The process was designed to enable only serious bidders to conduct detailed due diligence and put in the bids. We cannot comment on the process details, as there are confidentiality clauses,” she said, adding that “STP was the highest bidder”.
She, however, declined to name the 15 bidders. Earlier reports said they included PT Tower
Bersama Infrastructure Tbk, PT Sarana Menara Nusantara Tbk, PT Inti Bangun Sejahtera Tbk, PT
Nusantara Infrastructure Tbk and PT Centratama Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk.
PT Nusantara is controlled by Indonesian billionaire Peter Sondakh,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Peter Smythe V Thomas

    • 2716 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The justice also found that the defendants claim to only have created an invitation to treat was unjustified on the grounds that the bid met the time period, the minimum bid, the plaintiff was the highest bidder and didn 't impose a qualification on the bid. It is for these reasons that the judge found a binding contract between the buyer and vendor and henceforth implemented an order for specific performance, instructing the contract to be…

    • 2716 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 21 P1

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A contract is between two parties. One contract cannot provide details for anymore participants as it wouldn’t be certain enough. In order for it is certain one contract is kept between two parties. One party will offer a deal and the other party has to consider whether to accept it or not.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, there are cases in both Canadian and American law that demonstrate that this is not the case [1]. One of the general principles that show this was established by the Belle River Community Arena Inc. v. W.J.C. Kaufmann Co. et al.. Similar to the situation at hand, the Belle River case involved a bid that was much lower than intended. Both parties acknowledged the mistake in the bid and like the City of Waterloo, Belle River did not allow the contractor to revoke the mistaken tender. In this case, the Belle River Community Arena also sued Kaufmann for the difference between their bid and the next lowest bid [3]. The only major difference between this case and the Belle River case is that Belle River did not submit a formal offer while the City of Waterloo did [1]. However, in deciding the case and the support of this decision in the Ontario Court of Appeals, it is found that "In substance the purported offer, because of the mistake, was not the offer the offeror intended to make, and the offeree knew that […] The situation would be quite different, the Court of Appeal noted, if the offeree had not known the offer contained a mistake and had accepted it at face value." [3]. This constitutes a legal principle that ought to be applied to this case. It is best summarized as done in Law for Professional Engineers, "an…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The main issue is to evaluate the suitability of the chosen vendor by the Bidder Selection Board which is Marton Enterprise. This company has been chosen against 8 other vendors. The criteria for the selection is not identified by the board but assumed to be based on the quoted price.…

    • 2267 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When considering the bidding process that would be most effective for this solar panel installation company to use, the negotiated process, (RFP) appears to be the most favorable.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sealed bidding, also known as Invitation for Bids (IFB), is used when the government believes an “award can be made to the lowest price offeror who is responsive and responsible and the government’s requirement is reasonably well defined in the form of drawings and specifications” (Murphy, 2009, p. 17). When an IFB is released on a government website, FedBizOpps, any contractor who wishes to submit a bid is allowed. Government cannot limit an IFB to only particular contractors as this solicitation is based on adequate price competition. This is an advantage to contractors who might be new or older contractors who are looking to expand their expertise. Also, contractors are only required to submit the ‘bottom-line’ cost of their bid on IFB solicitations. Contractors must responsive, not taking exception to any terms of the proposed contract in its entirety, and responsible, be able to perform the work and meeting all conditions stated in solicitation however; they are not required to submit cost detail or technical documents such as past performances, performance work statement, cost narratives, etc. with their bids. There are a few disadvantages with this method. Contractors are not able to change their bids once submitted. The government opens all sealed bids to the public at the appointed due date and time. Contractors are able to see every bid…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The RFP process took four months to complete. They should have allotted at least that much time to make a decision on which contractor to use.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, they analyzed the competitors in the auction. The team observed it was a very opaque industry with only few companies public, limiting the access to information. Luckily, Apax had a competitive advantage (Wangner’s expertise) in the industry which allows Apax to know the sector inside and out. In addition to this, it seemed to be a very stable business with no high upside potential so the market was not heated about this sell. Furthermore, Apax analyzed the other bidders. They wanted to know if competitors where really interested in Xerium and what was the value for the competitors.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bullard Houses

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Target: $ 19,5 million for 100% of Downtown´s shares or proportional with a minimum of 60% while keeping houses intact.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    DOZIER industri

    • 1383 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The meeting had focused on the exchange risk related to the new sales contract. Dozier’s bid…

    • 1383 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many reasons why this price may not be used (candidates are expected to explain two).…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Competitor of Pt Wika

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    PT Adhi Karya (Persero) Tbk is one of the major Indonesian state-owned enterprise (BUMN) engaged in construction services. The company also supported by five subsidiry companies, consist of PT Adhi Reality, PT Duri Indah Raya, PT Adhicon Persada, Adhi Oman LLC, and Adhi Multipower Pte. Ltd. This company become competitors of PT Wijaya Karya Tbk (WIKA) because they also serve the similiar field or customer and over similiar product and services to customer in which both of the company’s business consist of construction, EPC, infrastructure investment, property and real estate…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    By the end of September, the company had Rp 17.54 trillion ($ 1.4 billion) in…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the evaluation of tenders in public entities, the successful tender is said to be the tender with the lowest evaluated price although the procuring entity is not bound to accept the lowest priced or any tender.…

    • 4077 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    poetry

    • 683 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: Martin Pariag submitted a bid for the construction of a mental health hospital. The advertisement noted that bids would be assessed on the basis of price and technical competence and that the South Regional Health Corporation would not be bound to the highest or lowest tender. Martin received a letter indicating that a decision was taken to pursue discussions with the lowest bidder.…

    • 683 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays