In Europe, the war with Germany was over but Japan was still fighting. So the U.S could concreted on the war with Japan. The U.S had atomic bombs ready and a decision had to be made; should they sent ground forces to invade Japan or should they bomb Japan. So on August 1945 the U.S decided to drop atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and this created some controversy. Some people though it was a good idea to bomb Japan, while others say that 200,000 innocent people were killed. I believe that bombing the two cities was the right decision because it did save the lives of many U.S soldiers and it ended World War II.
Document 1 is President Truman’s decision to bomb the cities. He talks about the pros and cons. Since he was the president he had a lot of stress and a lot of thinking to do. So he finally decided to use them and he never doubt to do so. The reason he decided to do it is because he believed it will end the war. Document 3 is Secretary of War Henry Stimson’s opinion about the bombing. He says that he the bombing was terrible but it did stop fire raids and the blockade that the U.S had on Japan and it did prevent the U.S army clashing with Japanese forces on land. The bombing did end the war. Document 3 is a interview with a American solider in a newspaper article from the New York Times. This document was written 20 years after the bombing and it says that the bomb showed the end of the war and soldiers could go home. I do require an additional source from an American solider that talks about how the bombing affected him. This is why I believe that the bombing was the right decision to make.
Not everybody, however, believe that Truman’s decision was right. Documents 2 is President Truman’s Chief of Staff, Admiral William E. Leahy, memoirs. In his memoirs he writes about why the bombing was so barbaric. He writes that he knew that Japan was ready to surrender and wars cannot be won by killing women and children....
Please join StudyMode to read the full document