Preview

Assisted Suicide; Right or Wrong.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1087 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assisted Suicide; Right or Wrong.
Jordie Mayfield Mayfield 1
Mrs. Alberici
English 10
October 21, 2011

Assisted Suicide; right or wrong.

An elderly person in a nursing home, who can barely understand a breakfast menu, is asked to sign a form consenting to be killed. Is this right or wrong? Assisted suicide also known as euthanasia is defined as “the practice of ending someone’s life in order to release incurable suffering.” (“Euthanasia” 711) Many people who seek help in ending their lives have an agonizing disease and are in great pain. It may also occur when incurably ill people ask their physician or friend and or relative to put them to death or allow them to die. Some believe medical practitioners may cause harm to patients if they are given high doses of pain-killing drugs that could cause death. Euthanasia is categorized in different ways: voluntary, non-voluntary, active and passive (involuntary). Active euthanasia is the injection of lethal drug. “Active euthanasia involves direct action by a physician or caregiver to induce death in a patient.” (“Euthanasia” 711) Passive euthanasia takes place when a physician with holds or with Mayfield 2 draws life-sustaining medical treatment, allowing an individual to die of natural causes. (711) in some cases physicians provide lethal drugs that patients can take to kill themselves. Voluntary euthanasia implies that a person is being put to death or his or her own free will, while involuntary euthanasia occurs without that party’s explicit request. (711) Euthanasia has a long history, for example in India it was once a customary to throw elderly people into the Ganges River. (711) “Health care professionals maintain that physicians are obligated to practice according to the ancient Greek Hippocratic Oath.” (36) Taking this oath, physicians promise to help the sick and never cause harm. Medical Students today do not necessarily take to this oath, and some say it is outdated and open to a variety of interpretations.



Cited: Thomas, David C. “euthanasia” The World Book Encyclopedia 2005 ed. Wasmuth, Carl E.”Euthanasia” encyclopedia Americana 2001 ed. Reason for euthanasia “Is there a right to die” Kathryn Gay.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The word Euthanasia derives from the Greek words Eu and Thanatos which means easy or good death. Euthanasia is is defined in the Oxford Dictionary as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma[1]. Euthanasia exists in various forms, each one specific in its criteria. Firstly there is active and passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia involves the use of direct action in order to end the patient’s life whilst passive euthanasia is the withholding of medical aid in order to allow the patient to die naturally such as not performing life-extending surgery or turning off a life support system. The next distinction is between Voluntary and Involuntary euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia involves the patient’s termination at their own request whilst involuntary euthanasia occurs when the patient is unable to ably make a decision and therefore a suitable person makes the decision for them. Indirect euthanasia involves treating the patients pain but with the side effect of death, the primary intention is often used to justify the outcome. This is often referred to as the doctrine of double effect and in reality is not considered euthanasia given that the real purpose of the treatment is pain relief and death is merely seen as the side-affect. Finally there is assisted suicide which involves a patient incapable of committing suicide themselves asks for assistance in doing so. Euthanasia is a controversial topic that contradicts the age old moral injunction “thou shalt not kill”[2]. But similarly denying patient’s of this choice is defying medical practice cornerstones such as the patient’s autonomy and promoting their best interests. Different countries hold varying stances on Euthanasia but it is currently illegal in the UK. Most recently the case of Tony Nicklinson, a man totally paralysed by locked-in syndrome requesting euthanasia, has come to the forefront of the debate. Given the right to take his case to…

    • 5500 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Similarly, euthanasia can be active and passive, but each differs from the other. The difference between active and passive euthanasia is that active euthanasia is that death is induced. For instance, the explicit request from a person suffering an incurable disease wishing to die. In this case, he or she is induced to death by injecting a lethal dose of a drug. Contrary, passive euthanasia occurs when a person is removed a life-sustaining device such as a heart-lung machine. In addition, there is a difference between euthanasia and assisted suicide and it develops in the degree of involvement and behavior. Assisted suicide is when a physician makes lethal options available to the patient to be used based on the patient’s own choosing. In contrast, euthanasia entails the physician taking a role in carrying out the patient’s request by involving intravenous delivery of a lethal substance. In consequence, euthanasia refers as “easy death” since it is the act of ending the lives of individuals who are suffering from an incurable…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every person knows what the circle of life consists of- to be born, to grow and to die. The lines between the right and wrongs of each are fuzzy and unclear. Assisted suicide brings up one of the biggest moral debates and there are so many questions with no clear answers: who should and shouldn’t be allowed to assist in suicides? Should assisted suicide be just for the terminally ill, or for all? What protection will there be for the people? and the biggest question of all- is it right or wrong? Those who are considered “pro-death”, believe that being able to choose how one dies is their own right. That there is a significant “difference between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die” (Breslow). Others however, believe The Suicide…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moral and ethical debates attempted to resolves controversial issues but never seem to end with everyone agreeing. Often these ethical and moral debates are complex and involve opinions persuaded by religion or customs and have legal implications to consider. Physician assisted death is one of these very complex and controversial issues that all people will never agree on. Many questions arise in the debate of physician assisted death such as patients’ rights, physicians controlling the right if someone lives or dies, a patience’s mental state, a family member’s rights, religious beliefs of the parties involved and the law. Philosophers attempt to explain the different theories that people will use to argue their belief systems in terms of logic and reasoning. For example, some people may take the position of a deontologist who would argue that it is our moral duty to support and sustain life therefore assisted suicide should not be allowed. Unfortunately, this very emotional thought provoking debate is not a “black and white issue,” as most ethical arguments are not. In the situation of physician assisted death I disagree with the deontologist point of view that it is immoral for a physician to assist a patient in suicide. I believe as some relativist due, that as long as the patient is fully capable of making this decision and the patient is in a constant state of agony, then the patient has the right to make the choice to live or die. A relativist believes that morals are only relative to that particular society and if physician assisted death was considered moral in that group then it would be considered a moral act. Neither theory is without flaws as some deontologist even share my point of view and some relativist can be very extreme in what they feel is relative to being morally right or wrong. The bottom line is that people will probably never completely agree on this subject.…

    • 2640 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is assisting a loved one to die morally acceptable or is it murder? This essay will look at both sides of this argument and leave the reader to decide which side they more agree with. The main article I will be looking at is the one by Susan M. Wolf and the death of her sick father. There are two sides to this situation. One group of people feel that it is morally and lawfully wrong to help in the death of any person, regardless of who they are and believe the culprit to be just as guilty as a murderer. Others will argue that it is only helping to speed up a process that is inevitably coming and helping a person to quit the pain is human nature showing sympathy and courage. In this essay, I will be looking at both sides of this argument and leave it to the reader to decide which argument he believes to be more reasonable.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Living is more valuable than dying and threatening to diminish the value of life is dangerous. Euthanasia, also called mercy killing, is the practice of doctors intentionally ending a terminally ill patient’s life in what is purportedly a gentle and dignified manner. The term originated in ancient Greek and means “easy death.” Doctors perform euthanasia by administering lethal drugs or by withholding treatment that would prolong the patient’s life. Physician-assisted suicide is also a form of euthanasia, but the difference between the two methods is that in euthanasia, doctors end the patient’s life with lethal injections, whereas, in physician-assisted suicide, patients kill themselves with a lethal amount of drugs prescribed by the doctors.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1). Physicians have sworn an oath which does not allow them to take part in the killing of people. Individuals against euthanasia believe that physicians should not take part in directly causing death because they will not be able to keep it under control. Euthanasia would never be legalized without regulations and controls in place. If euthanasia were legalized then doctors would not be breaking any oaths or laws. Physicians are knowledgeable professionals who can provide their patients with all of the information needed to make an informed decision. Physicians should be treated with respect and not judged when they have not done nothing for you to think otherwise. The option of euthanasia would only be given to those who are terminally ill so that they can make their own decision and not prolong suffering and pain for themselves and their families. Gibson explains that “human life is sacred and it is wrong to kill another human” (2008, para. 3). Those against euthanasia believe that it devalues human life and we should only “[do] unto others as we would have others do unto us” (Gibson, 2008, para. 7). Euthanasia gives patients the freedom and respect to make one final decision in their life when they are not able to make any others. This actually shows that they value their life enough to not suffer unnecessarily. They want other to remember them when they were happy and not in pain. Euthanasia can also give patients a chance to donate organs which again shows that they really do value human…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate about whether assisted suicide is morally right or morally wrong is an extremely difficult controversy. Many people assume that it is morally wrong since the practice is in fact illegal in the majority of the United States. Many people also believe that assisted suicide is spiritually wrong especially in terms of religion; from experience, many Catholics believe that the idea of suicide is a sin. However, in any controversy there is always another side. There were factors that led me to believe why assisted suicide can be morally right. According to William Winslade, a Professor of Medicine and Psychiatry of Behavioral Sciences at the University of Texas Medical Branch and Kyriakos Markides, a professor in the department of preventative…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assisted Suicide is a medical practice looked at by some people as evil, while some others may believe the complete and total opposite.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 21st, 2010, 41-year-old Ethan Remmel, a developmental psychologist and associate professor at Western Washington University, was diagnosed with incurable, stage four colon cancer. Monday, June 13th, 2011 Ethan passed away, becoming one of 255 terminally ill individuals to voluntarily die with the help of a physician in Washington. He decided to take advantage of the state’s legislation allowing assisted suicide and left behind two sons, ages eight and three. He made his decision after suffering through excruciating pain for over a year, while the cancer spread to his bones and left him with severe fatigue, causing him to not be able to enjoy his life. “…It's not possible to live well when you feel too sick and tired to do anything or enjoy anything…”, stated Ethan in his blog on March 23rd, 2011. He didn’t want his body or mind to deteriorate to the point where he couldn’t spend time with his kids, explained his partner, Grace Wang (Aleccia).…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The end of one’s life, for many people, is not easy. It can be extremely painful. Some doctors, who have treated people who were terminally ill and dying, say that sometimes it can be gruesome. At times to the point that,…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assisted suicide is an issue that has prompted discussion on the “right to die” and whether or not it is an inherent right in the Constitution. Those against assisted suicide say those who assist should be incarcerated for murder and medical professional should have their licenses revoked and integrity questioned. They believe this goes against the Due Process Clause in the Constitution, stating citizens should not be “deprived of life. liberty, or property.” Proponents of assisted suicide argue that Due Process protects their rights to personal choice and should be an option for those who are terminally ill and suffering. The novel (and upcoming movie) “Me Before You” by Jojo Moyes explores this debate.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician assisted suicide is a debated ethical topic in the science community. “Physician assisted suicide is the term used by the public and in the medical literature to describe the voluntary self administration of lethal medications prescribed by a physician expressly for the purpose of ending ones life” (Chin, Hedberg, Higginson, and Fleming). Physician assisted suicide is not a widely accepted topic, thus it is only legal in 5 states. There are many laws that are associated with PAS, describing what is and isn't allowed to happen between terminal patients and their doctors. Specifically, in Oregon they have the Death with dignity act, which allows PAS to be used in certain circumstances. “The law states that, in order to participate,…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assisted death, popular subject right now in life. But, to me it is more than just a trend. Have you thought about whether or not, assisted death for terminally ill people should be illegal. What do you think? Well I personally I agree and I think it is very wrong for someone to attempt suicide. Having a doctor plan your death is just as bad. By the end of this essay maybe your thoughts will change.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, between 1990 and 1999, a well-known advocate for physician assisted suicide, Jack Kevorkian helped 130 patients end their lives. He begun the debate on assisted suicide should be legal or should be illegal. Kevorkian believed in the right to die, “The voluntary self-elimination of individual and mortally diseased or crippled lives taken collectively can only enhance the preservation of public health and welfare” (Kevorkian). He created his own machine that would be used to give the patient a mixture of pain killers and poisons to end a patient’s life. Kevorkian was charged with first degree murder for the death of one of his patients he had helped end their life. Kevorkian tried to get a ballot…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays