Miltiades, one of the ten generals of Athens later the Strategos had contributed greatly towards the Greek 's victory at Marathon against the Persians. After word of the Persians arrival at Marathon the Athenian assembly met in order to discuss whether or not to fight at Marathon or remain in the city in order to protect it. Considering what had happen at Eretria, Miltiades had convinced the polemarch, Calimachus and the Athenians to march out of the city to fight the Persians at Marathon. He had approximately 10 000 Athenians and 1000 Plataeans.
The Athenians had requested aid from Sparta which they agreed, but unfortunately were not able to due to a religious festival. The Athenians marched out to Marathon and camped beyond the foothills providing a defence force against the Persians cavalry attacks. With the knowledge of the Spartans soon arrival, the Persians devised a plan to journey around the lands to attack the city of Athens directly. This had open up an opportunity for Miltiades to defeat the Persians whilst their cavalry men were absent from the beach. Therefore he had ordered for attack after the cavalry men had a boarded the ships.
With background knowledge of the Persians tactics and strategy, Miltiades was able to devise certain tactics which enable the victory of the Greeks. He ordered that the Athenian army was situated with strong wings and a weak centre marching the length of the Persian 's army; the Persians processed a strong centre but weak wings. This enables the Greeks to attack the weak Persian wings. Another tactic developed by Miltiades was that the Greeks were order to charge at the Persian army to neutralise the Persians archery; one of their main tactics. In the end the Greek won a decisive victory against the Persians; seven ships were taken and 6400 Persians troops were killed in comparison to 162 Athenians.
Overall Miltiades contribution to the Greeks victory at Marathon had played a significant role. He enabled the Greeks to fight against the Persians at Marathon as well as causing them a devastating defeat. The Athenians had also adopted military tactics and it had also proven to the world that the Persians were not invincible. This was regarded as the first step to the formation of the Athenian Empire.
Bibliography:P Bradley, Ancient Greece Using EvidenceV Ehrenberg, From Solon to SocratesHerodotus, The Histories
Bibliography: P Bradley, Ancient Greece Using EvidenceV Ehrenberg, From Solon to SocratesHerodotus, The Histories
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The reasons for the Greek victory against the Persians in 490 to 480/479 BC was a mixture of exceptional leadership, skilful tactics and strategy, superior weapons and soldiers, and Greek unity. Strong leadership was the most important aspect of the Greek defence, as without the intelligence and bravery of the leaders, the Greeks would have been easily defeated. As a result of the excellent leadership; Greek tactics, strategy, and unity were greatly strengthened. Combined with their better weapons and soldiers, the Greeks held the advantage and seized opportunities at the perfect moment. Also, with each victory the Greeks grew more confident of success and defiant of the Persian attempts to invade. The poor organisation and disarray of their enemy led to an undermining of the Persian might and further improved Greece's chances of success.…
- 2672 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
Therefore the Athenians secured in this way seven of the vessels; while with the reminder the barbicans pushed off, and taking aboard their Eretrian prisoners form the island where they had left them, doubled Cape Sunium, hoping to reach Athens before the return of the Athenians, and because of that The Athenians defeated a Persian army in the battle of Marathon.…
- 1358 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
| Spartan land forces and Athenian sea forces were superior to the much larger Persian armies and navies.…
- 1565 Words
- 7 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The pass was about 330 feet in width. Leonities tactics helped him defend the large Persian fleet by creating a battle formation called Phalanx formation in which the men formed a wall of overlapping shields and protruded their spears out from the sides of the shields. This war tactic helped defend the persian attack because since the pass was only 330 feet wide Xerxes couldn't call his army to all attack at once they had to attack in waves so that made it easier for the spartans to hold off the massive persian army. Xerxes attacked greece because Darius originally attacked Greece because the Athenians gave support to the "Ionian Revolt" against Persian rule in Asia Minor. Darius's army was decisively defeated at the Battle of Marathon in the first attempt to invade Greece. After Darius died his son, Xerxes, vowed revenge for his father's defeat at the Battle of…
- 597 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Greeks had chosen to defend a narrow pass, or gap, between the mountains of central Greece and the sea, called Thermopylae. This pass was part of the route into Greece from the north. King Leonidas of Sparta rounded up 300 of Sparta’s most elite soldiers with the help of 7000 Greek soldiers from other states marched for an attempt to block the only road by which the massive Persian army could pass, while the small army knew they would face a large army which would end up to be over 100,000 Persians.…
- 423 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Persian army then sailed to Attica landing near the town of marathon The Athenians and their allies the Plataea marched to marathon. At first, there plan was to contain the Persians in marathon by blocking the exits. After five days of using this tactic, the Athenians decided to attack.…
- 408 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Greek offensive, although contributed to Miltiades as a brilliant strategic decision, is an important historiographical issue for modern historians. Herodotus tells us that opinion among the Athenian commanders was divided with some opposed to attacking with their heavily outnumbered force. Others, especially Miltiades supported an offensive strategy. Miltiades is credited with persuading the war archon Callimachus through a stirring speech to cast his deciding vote in favour of an offensive strategy. Herodotus in his narrative has Miltiades say ‘If we refuse to fight, I have little doubt that the result will be bitter”. However it has also been suggested that the Greek offensive was based on the apparent absence of the Persian cavalry which Herodotus fails to mention. This is puzzling as most modern historians acknowledge that a Persian cavalry force had already disembarked from the fleet onto land and Herodotus said the Persians chose Marathon because it was “the best ground for cavalry to manoeuvre in.”. It has also been assumed that Miltiades deployed the Greek phalanx with strong wings and a weak centre, a strategy that secured…
- 1132 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The Greeks during the Greco-Persian War manipulated terrain as a force multiplier in many battles; at the Battle of Marathon, Miltiades used the Vrana Valley to prevent a Persian march on Athens, at the Battle of Thermopylae, Leonidas used the narrow, Thermopylae pass to invalidate the Persian numbers, and at the Battle of Artemisium, Themistocles used the Artemisium Strait to aid in his battle against the Persian fleets.…
- 491 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
A barefooted runner won a gold medal in summer Olympic marathon in Rome, Italy in 1960. According to Philip Magnier, "Abebe Bikila." Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia (2015): Research Starters the Olympic marathon is a long distance running event with a fixed distance of 42.195 kilometers (26 miles 385 yards), and usually run as a group in a road race. It is one of the best known games held every four years with participation from different nations of the world. Ultimately, Bikila determined to run barefoot in long distance that was impossible to complete even wearing shoes. As stated by Sandra Wallace article “Running Barefoot,” Bikila was a last-minute replacement to go to the Rome Olympics since his team mate injured his ankle during…
- 178 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The Greeks had many advantages when it came to storming a beachhead. With experienced pilots and rowers, the ships could be landed in such a formation that allowed the infantry to jump off easily but still provide maximum…
- 1949 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
Athens and Sparta, were the strongest cities , Athens and Sparta competed with the supreme political influence of Greece . Athens and Sparta's men always trained to be ready for war. Sparta's main strength lay in its ground troops, while Athens's powerful navy controlled the seas. The tide was turned in the Persian Wars when the legendary 300 Spartans led by King Leonidas slowed Xerxes' advance at Thermopylae. The Persians were later ultimately defeated at the Battle of Salamis by the superior strategy of…
- 141 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Demosthenes asked for a military mobilization against the Macedonians, but every attempt of the Athens was not successful because they did not have enough strong troops and money to support the war. He also had false and decisive speeches to wrongfully instruct the Athenians, for example, it is as below:…
- 335 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Peloponnesian War was the turning point in Athenian hegemony in Ancient Greece. It was fought in 431 B.C. between the Delian League, led by Athens, and the Peloponnesian League led by Sparta. According to Thucydides, Athens’ imposing hegemonic status and its overwhelming quest for more power made the Peloponnesian War and Athens’s eventual fall from power inevitable. Despite the Athenians having a far more superior navy and being considerably wealthier, they were defeated and made subjects of Sparta. In this paper, I will discuss Thucydides’ and Socrates’ reasons for why Athens lost the war and then I will present my own theory.…
- 2021 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Sparta then prepared for war against Athens. As war broke out Athens began to fall and lose the war. Mainly because they were better fighters on water and not on land. Unlike the Spartans who were the best at fighting on the land.…
- 813 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
P.51), by the year of 457 had encircled the city center with a massive stone wall and fortified a broad corridor with a wall on both sides leading all the way to the main harbor at Piraeus (1.107.1. P.57-58). “… Athens was now fortified sufficiently to protect its inhabitants …” (1.91.4. P. 50). Athenian fleet, built against “the prospect of the barbarian invasion” (1.14.3. P.12), and the city fortifications – made it unconquerable to direct attack. This concept laid the basis for the Athenian strategy – defense at land and offense at sea. In the light of the preparation to the war the Athenian general Pericles “gave the citizens some advice on their present affairs… They were not to go out to battle, but to come into the city and guard it, and get ready their fleet, in which their real strength lay.” (2.13.2. P.98). Protected from the land attacks by long walls down to Piraeus, Athens would behave like an island. It would avoid any direct land confrontations with Spartans at any price while its fast and mobile navy would attack Spartans at sea. To protect the population of Attica, Pericles commanded to move more than one hundred thousand people from Attica to Athens and bring them inside the city walls. As long as Athenian navy would stay supreme, Athenians could survive any siege, by resupplying from the allies of the empire. The technology of military siege machines in this period was not developed enough to break such walls easily. Consequently, regardless of what harm was done to the agricultural lands of Attica during the war, the Athenians could rely on sea power and import food by ship through their fortified port. They had huge financial resources collected from their silver mines and from the dues of the Delian League (1.99. P.53). The…
- 814 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays