Preview

ASIC's Investigation of Kleenmaid Group

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2461 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
ASIC's Investigation of Kleenmaid Group
Research on ASIC’s investigation about the continuation of trade by Queensland’s sunshine coast based national importer and distributor of whitegoods, also the operator of Kleenmaid brand of kitchen appliances, Kleenmaid Group, despite becoming insolvent from March 2008.

The Fact:
Three former directors of national whitegoods distributor Kleenmaid, Andrew Eric Young, Bradley Wendell Young and Gary Colleyer Armstrong were accused of 20 criminal charges including a $13 million fraud and insolvent trading, following an ASIC investigation. The trio were charged with 18 counts of criminal insolvent trading of debts totalling more than $4 million and a $13 million fraud committed on Westpac Bank (ASIC 2012).
Gary Armstrong and Andrew Eric Young was also charged with further fraud, accused of withdrawing $330,000 from the company’s bank accounts two days before it went into voluntary administration (ASIC 2012).
The focus of ASIC’s investigation centred on the solvency of the Kleenmaid Group and a corporate restructure undertaken by the Kleenmaid directors in September 2007. ASIC alleges the Kleenmaid Group continued to trade despite becoming insolvent from March 2008 (ASIC 2012). The former directors appeared before Magistrate Ehrick at Maroochydore Magistrates Court for their first appearance on February 16, 2012. The trios were not required to enter a plea and released on conditional bail (ASIC 2012).
The matter returned to Maroochydore Magistrates Court for mention on 17 May 2012. There at Maroochydore Magistrates Court, the matter was adjourned until 21 June 2012 for a further mention at Maroochydore Magistrates Court. On 21 June 2012 at Maroochydore Magistrates Court the matter was adjourned until 20 September 2012 for a further mention at Maroochydore Magistrates Court. The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions is prosecuting the matter (ASIC 2012).

The Background:
Each of the criminal insolvent trading charges under section 588G(3) of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Once the trials proceeded I found that the barristers and the judge himself were very understanding and direct to the defendants backgrounds and current situations when determining the reasons for their crimes. This sat well with the social work value of social reformism (Whittington and Whittington, 2006) and the belief that social and personal problems, can be explained by an individual’s place in society and the opportunities and esteem given to them as individuals. In all cases reasoning was found for their criminal behavior and probable causes in drug use. Therefore it could be said that all three defendants where given a chance in order to prove themselves as the judge handed them all suspended sentences. My personal feelings was that all three defendants where dealt with fairly and ethically. The judge treated them all as equals, showed an understanding nature and worked in an anti-oppressive…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As and end result Hill and Morgan were found guilty which lead to the disband of the company.…

    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legt 1710 Assignment 1

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The hearing of this case was held in the Court of Appeal of the New South Wales Supreme Court.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Minchialamadonna

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "This is not news to her there are proceedings in a civil context commenced in December last year." Ms Carter said McPhee was no longer employed and so could not access other people's money and had been fully cooperative in civil proceedings launched by alleged victims. The court heard her assets including an apartment have been frozen as a result of the lawsuit and police have access to her bank accounts. "In no way has she moved away from the civil proceedings or the police proceedings," Ms Carter said. "She poses no risk to the community at large… she has no access to anyone else's money nor does she have access to her own money." The court heard her parents were willing to act as bail guarantors and have been supportive of their daughter throughout the investigations.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Study Ephonia M Green

    • 2494 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The crime went undetected for a long period of time due to the lack of supervision from AAMC and for the lack of segregation of duties. Once the invoices were submitted by Green the accounting department should not have returned to checks to Green, and the checks should have been mailed by the accounting department not Green. The accounting department should have also checked each invoice before the check was generated. There was also lack of management oversight, which all of these contributed to green embezzling more than $5.1 million. Embezzlement is a kind of property crime; it occurs when someone is in charge of someone else’s money…

    • 2494 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief - R. v. Hufsky

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The appellant was found guilty in provincial court for refusing to comply with the officer’s demand S. 234.1 (2)…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime and Misconduct Commission Level 2, North Tower Green Square 515 St Pauls Terrace, Fortitude Valley, Qld 4006 GPO Box 3123 Brisbane Qld 4001 Tel: (07) 3360 6060 Fax: (07) 3360 6333 Email: mailbox@cmc.qld.gov.au Note: This publication is accessible through the CMC website, www.cmc.qld.gov.au.…

    • 12708 Words
    • 51 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case About Anthony Tan

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The two courts involved in this case were the Central Local Court and the Supreme Court. The jurisdictions for the local court include the majority of criminal, summary prosecutions in NSW and with civil matters up to $100,000. It also conducts committal proceedings to determine whether or not indictable offences are to be committed to the District and Supreme Court. Meanwhile the jurisdictions for the Supreme Court has unlimited civil jurisdictions and handles claims of more than $750,000. It also deals with the most serious criminal matters, including murder and treason. The initial court for this case (Central Local Court) had refused bail, but when it reached the Supreme Court, the case was dismissed even before the trail had even started.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Centro Case 2007

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Australian Securities and investments Committee (ASIC) was seeking penalties against the directors of Centro Properties Group for not taking all reasonable steps to secure compliance with s295A of the Act and their breach of s180 (1)(directors’ duty to exercise care and diligence), s344 (1) (failure to comply with financial recording and financial reporting obligations) and s601FD (3)(duties of officers of responsible entity) of the Corporations Act 2001.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Report

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    [ 3 ]. David Brown et al, Criminal Laws: Material and commentary on Criminal Law and Process of New South Wales, 5th Ed, Sydney, The Federation Press, 2011 p. 143…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The purpose of this report is to sum up the court case of Rixon Vs Star City PTY LTD (2001 september). Mr Brian Rixon is the Appellant and Star City Pty Ltd (formerly Sydney Harbour Casino Pty Ltd) is the Respondent. Mr Rixon is suing Star City for battery, assult and unlawful arrest.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On April 26, 2010, Ernest Theodore Solo, the Chief Financial Officer of Chesapeake Petroleum & Supply Inc., pleaded guilty for embezzling over $2.7 million from the company. Solo had been employed with Chesapeake Petroleum & Supply Inc. since 1969, and became the Chief Financial Officer in 1990 (More News). According to Solo’s plea, from at least 2000 through 2008, Solo, “embezzled money from the company by authorizing and signing company checks made payable to himself or to a bank to which Solo owed money. Solo embezzled a total of $2,447,000 in this manner” (Chief Financial Officer Plead Guilty). In addition, during the same time period Solo also stole and additional approximate of $333,000 from the petty cash fund of the company. “Solo had exclusive control over the company’s petty cash fund and although the actual petty cash fund never exceeded $1,000, Solo had multiple checks prepared that were $3,000 or more. After cashing the checks, purportedly for the petty cash fund, Solo replenished the petty cash fund, but kept the excess funds for himself” (Chief Financial Officer Plead Guilty). Additionally, Solo attempted to hide the embezzlement by, falsifying the financial records of the company; destroying records of the checks; and hiding the fraud from outside auditors hired by the company to review its finances. Because of his actions, “Solo faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison and…

    • 1062 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Report Essay

    • 2780 Words
    • 12 Pages

    For my court report I decided to visit Cloverhill District Court in Clondalkin, Dublin 22.…

    • 2780 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coca

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The criminal charges relate to a $95 million loan the directors took from ANZ during the broker's dying days in the hope that…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court Visit

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This civil case was listed under motion on May 3, 2013; Deputy Registrar Lawton assigned this case to Magistrate R. Brown. I have followed them from the registry department up to the courtroom where it was assigned. Evidences were presented right away on the presiding magistrate, some details are unclear as they don’t mention it and just are just reading the evidences presented. They are representing themselves and not a private solicitor. Both the plaintiff and defendant act appropriately with each other and await their turn to speak and when they speak they stand up.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays