Preview

Arms Trade

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
285 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arms Trade
"I have seen how easy it is for nuclear contamination to occur, and how hard it is to clean it up…. Do nations possess nuclear, chemical and biological weapons because of fear of attack from some other nation, or is it because without them the strong cannot exploit the weak?" Andreas T.

The arms trade is a major cause of human rights abuses. Some governments spend more on military expenses than on social development, communications infrastructure and health combined. While every nation has the right and the need to ensure its security, in these changing times, arms requirements and procurements may need to change too.

Each year, around $45-60 billion worth of arms sales are agreed. Some two-thirds of sales are made to developing countries. The 5 permanent members of the UN Security Council (US, Russia, France, United Kingdom and China), together with Germany and Italy account for over 80% of the arms sold between 2001 and 2008. Some of the arms sold go to regimes where human rights violations will occur. Corruption often accompanies arms sales due to the large sums of money involved.

World military spending had reduced since the Cold War ended, but a few nations such as the US retain high level spending. In recent years, global military expenditure has increased again and is now comparable to Cold War levels again. Recent data shows global spending at over $1.4 trillion, annually (or $1.2 trillion at constant 2005 prices). The highest military spender is the US accounting for just under half of the world’s spending, more than the rest of the G7 (most economically advanced countries) combined, and more than all its potential enemies,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    military spending is accountable for 54 percent of all federal discretionary spending, which is $598.5 billion dollars. The second largest federal discretionary spending is the government, which is only 6% of the spending with $72.9 billion dollars (2). To add on, discretionary spending represents less than one-third of the total federal budget (5). Obviously, with all this spending, the U.S. is at the top of Global Firepower (GFP) list with Russia on the second place (3). There is a total of 4,999 military bases around the world, including U.S. and the number of people working in each military base, that is a lot of money spent on military only (4). So to reduce some spending on defense, the government should reduce the number of military bases, which will result in less personal and less money spend. However, this is difficult to do because many people believe and has been the guarding country for other countries for decades now. Also, many people are employed under the defense department, so if the spending is cut the unemployment rate will…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the national defense expenditures brought about by the end of the Cold War in…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HIS 105 Assignment 2

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After the Civil War and by the mid-20th century, the United States had become the dominant force in international relations. Some have argued that the United States’ military functions as the world’s “police.”…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    U.S World History 05.06

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Despite the fall of the Soviet Union 19 years ago in 1991, the issue of nuclear arms, besides terrorism, remains one of the chief security concerns in the contemporary world. Accordingly, the following issues concerning nuclear arms remained unresolved security concerns.Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These events not only brought about the surrender of the Japan and an end to World War II, but they also helped shaped the nature of international politics for the next six decades.The atomic bomb is the crudest form of a series of powerful nuclear weapons to be eventually developed and come into existence. Both superpowers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, eventually built massive stockpiles of nuclear weapons during the Cold War. This escalation of nuclear arms possession led to…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Military Budget Cuts

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The United States military has a major presence worldwide. We have the most dominant force and by far are the most advanced. There are soldiers and troops in over 150 countries across six continents. That does not count for all of the soldiers based on naval ships that constantly travel the oceans going country to country. With all of the soldiers, military equipment, testing, and research and development, the military’s cost has been averaging over 500 billion dollars annually. There has been an ongoing debate on whether or not to cut the military’s budget. On August 2, 2011, The Budget Control Act was signed into law to try and decrease our national debt by 2 trillion. Starting on January 2, 2012, the military will cut spending by 54.7 billion for the next nine years. Gary Bass is the founder of OMB, and has a doctorate in psychology and education from Michigan University. Baker Spring has a master’s degree in national security from Georgetown University. He specializes in examining the threat of ballistic missiles.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fundamental component of the proliferation debate revolves around the perceived or alleged efficiency of nuclear deterrence. Proliferation optimists argue that, “more may be better” because nuclear weapons increase the cost of nuclear conflict, ultimately deterring states from engaging in nuclear warfare with a nuclear-armed state (Suzuki 2015). Optimists argue that nuclear deterrence works reliably, thus there seemingly less to be feared from nuclear proliferation and beneficial to a state to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this day and age, many may acknowledge the very controversial issue of technology for peace. This subject is so debated because nuclear weapons have the ability to destroy the world as we know it. However, they are essential if we are to protect ourselves. We need to have them, because almost anybody can gain control of them and become a threat. Mutually Assured Destruction insures that both sides need to have weapons of mass destruction to prevent a nuclear war. The use of human soldiers to make peace is too great a risk, and not worth it. With such treacherous weapons as these, it is crucial that we make all the right decisions, but we must also give the world some credit and acknowledge the fact that people have learnt from their mistakes, like what happened in Japan, and nobody wants that to happen again. It is imperative that we have these arms because the technology is already out there and almost anyone can obtain them, Mutually Assured Destruction insures that as long as both sides have them then nobody will strike, and the risk of human casualties is too great and not worth it.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Georges Clemenceau once said “war is too important to be left to the generals.” In Dr. Strangelove, Col. Ripper remarks that now “war is too important to be left to the politicians. They have neither the time, the training, nor the inclination for strategic thought” but Kubrick’s message implies that war is too important to be left to anybody at all. So with the persistence of nuclear technology as weapons of mass destruction, the question arises: Do we, as decision-makers, have the restraint not to use such weapons on one another? The question remains unanswered, but if there is to be peace, we must remain cautious and aware of their implications. Nuclear technology gives humanity an incredible opportunity to move forward, but if misused, it could send all life on earth back to the stone…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the U.S. has the greatest military spending world nation and it is the highest budget in federal spending, the information presented will discuss the issues of military spending. Understanding how economic growth is working in the United States will influence the opinion of the American society. Since almost 37 percent thinks that we should spend more on military (Newport), this research paper might convince those with such point of views to reconsider their opinions about…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second, It was believed that Nuclear weapons are the symbol of power.Many big countries like China, The United States or Russia. They all have them.And that's going to make other small countries want to have them. So they try every way to make nuclear weapons even, they have to lose a lot of money.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue of selling assault weapons to civilians in the United States is a contentious concern across the nation. Assault weapons such as shotguns and pistols are very powerful armaments. Therefore, it possess risk instead of giving benefit to people. This essay will argue that the sale of assault weapons in the United States to non-military persons should be banned. To support this claim, I will demonstrate that the sale of weapons triggers violence and crime, increases incidences of death and weapons do not provide protection as alleged, it is dangerous for civilians to own them, in fact.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Current Affairs Analysis

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sagan, Scott D. 1996-1997. “Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons?: Three Models in Search of a Bomb”. International Security 21 (3).…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Control Agreements

    • 2827 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The United Nation’s Permanent Five (P5), with the addition of Germany, are the top exporters of arms. The United States, Russia, and the United Kingdom have specifically been involved in the most significant weapon agreements and relations. There are many agreements and treaties to control and regulate the mass amounts of weaponry traded and sold to states around the globe. Arm control agreements deal with two separate weapon regimes: weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and small arms and light weapons. It is harder to achieve agreements on small arms and light weapons than weapons of mass destruction because both sides get what they want—developed countries make a profit and developing nations modernize their defense—and states do not states…

    • 2827 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Arms Trade

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Arms Trade is one of the world's biggest industries employing many hundreds of thousands worldwide. It involves large, rich, prosperous countries such as the United Kingdom, the USA, France and Russia selling weapons to other countries. Over 75% of the weapons sold by the UK in 1989 were sold to poor, developing countries such as South Korea, Sierra Leone and Liberia. At first, there may seem to be nothing wrong with this common practice but a closer look reveals the brutality and horror behind this industry.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    crimea

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    states in the world today. Over 90 percent of these are in Russian and U.S. arsenals. But…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays