Preview

Arms Limitations Talks

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
499 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arms Limitations Talks
The arms limitations talks played a big role in reducing tensions during the Cold war for example the United States and the USSR, helped relieve the public about an outbreak of a nuclear war and significantly reduced the number of nuclear weapons in the world. The arms limitation talks reduced tension during the Cold War by promoting the idea of peace. The first talks about arms limitations tried to reduce tensions between the United States and the USSR. Although these talks did not seem to be effective at first (SALT I) they brought up an idea. Later on when the SALT II was introduced which was more effective. The SALT II agreement really strengthened ties between the USSR and the United States. This agreement reduced the number of nuclear weapons of each side because they had enough to destroy the world multiple times over. In conclusion when the number of nuclear weapons was reduced this really created a more peaceful world.

The world was a more peaceful place as a new Intermediate- Range- Nuclear Forces Treaty. While this treaty reduced tension it also calmed down the general public from countries other then the United States and the USSR. The way this was achieved was by eliminating intermediate range missiles. As this happened specifically Europe happened to get calmer because since the superpowers didn’t have any missiles that could attack them they felt safer. By getting rid of these intermediate range weapons it reduced tension as well as made the people in Europe feel safer.

Until the SALT II there weren’t any treaties that significantly reduced the number of nuclear weapons. In Source A which talked about SALT I and II achieved what they were set out to do. Source B showed what the SALT I agreement did by limiting the number of nuclear weapons although it shows that the USSR has more the United States had better technology so to even it out the treaty gave the USSR more ICBM’s. Although the SALT I took a big step towards the reduction of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Richard M. Nixon commenced a new policy called Détente, which is a French word that means “release from tension,” with the implementation of this new policy the relations between the Soviet Union and the United States improved, it was something completely different to the period of Confrontations and Surrogated Interventions. During the period of Détente, Nixon reduced the policy of containment, emphasizing the talks concerning discussions of ways to control nuclear weapons. One of the approaches made by Nixon was when he visited Moscow, Russia, and signed seven agreements that include space exploration and arms control, the discussion of this last topic was made during a series of talks called: Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (S.A.L.T). But…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To defuse the Cold War conflict, during the 1980s, Reagan and Gorbachev participated in a series of summits and meetings, leading to an eventual compromise (“Reagan-Gorbachev Compromise”).…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first critical piece of foreign policy done by the Carter administration was the passing of the SALT II treaty later in the administration. It was the first treaty that successfully passed after these talks, and it stated, “Declaring their intention to undertake in the near future negotiations further to limit and further to reduce strategic offensive arms.” (The Government of the United States) The treaty was explicit in demanding the reduction of all aspects of the Soviet Union and United States’ nuclear capability. In addition, it was the result of mutual understanding, which is contained in the full title of the treaty resulting from both nations comprehending the dangers of large nuclear arsenals. Continuing,…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Detente was officially set in motion in November1969 through the first Strategic arms limitations talks (SALT I) held in Geneva. The United States was represented by its President Richard Nixon and his national security advisor, Henry Kissinger, who were described as pragmatists and the architects of detente. The Soviet Union was represented by Nikita Brezhnev who had proved to be a hardliner,however, various historians viewed him as a “realist.” The openness and willingness to discuss the speed of the arms race was aided by the change in attitudes of the leaders at the…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It was a new age of Atomic Power with massive capabilities. Both opposing sides had the weapons and both were on the edge of their seats to use…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When the Reagan Administration took office in 1981 they brought with it one of the most anticommunist policies that the United States had seen to date. However, by the end of his second term in office, Reagan had changed his views and realized that the conflict between the two world super powers could possibly be just a “mutual misperception.” There was three meetings held between Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev in which there were attempts to better the U.S.-Soviet relationship. The first summit, the Geneva Summit, was held in November of 1985 and it resulted in provided benefits for both sides. First, and most importantly, Reagan and Gorbachev “had come to like and respect each other,” which allowed for a successful endeavor. The second summit was the Reykjavik Summit, held in October of 1986. To many of the participants this meeting is considered a failure even though there was serious discussions about eliminating a major portion of both countries nuclear arsenal.1 The third summit, held in…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scare

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since the 1980’s, the two superpowers have reduced their nuclear weapons by almost 70%. Today, we still have more nuclear weapons than any military purpose could justify. Unfortunately, the command and control system in Russia has deteriorated further.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    President Ronald Reagan’s Doctrine was supposed to sponsor anti-communist guerillas who were trying to overthrow pro-Soviet regimes (Roskin 58). President Reagan supported anti-communist groups, and Reagan argued that the American economy was on the move again, while the Soviet Union had become stagnant. President Reagan had morally opposed nuclear weapons since 1945, and he quietly worked to make the world safer from the threat of nuclear war. Under Reagan’s administration, the Reagan Doctrine was implemented by the United States to oppose global influence of the Soviet Union during the final years of the Cold War. The Reagan Doctrine was designed to diminish Soviet Union’s influence in Asia, Latin America, and Africa as part of the Cold War’s strategy. The Reagan Doctrine called both for challenging communism and extending freedom, and administration policy makers had trouble reconciling those goals. Most of the "freedom fighters" that the administration supported were allies of convenience, more appealing for what they opposed than for the values they espoused (Pach 2006). During President Reagan’s time in office, there was a situation that required U.S. diplomatic efforts, the diplomatic doctrine was followed by President Reagan, there were effects of the diplomatic efforts for the U.S and other countries, and there are advantages and disadvantages to The Reagan’s Doctrine.…

    • 3288 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During his first term in office, President Reagan managed to survive an assassination attempt. He was reelected to his second term of office in 1984 by an astonishing record of votes. Several terroristevents occurred during the President’s eight years in office. Reagan had taken great stride in saying that Americans would never negotiate with terrorists. He negotiated with Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev in 1987 to reduce both countries arsenals of nuclear weapons. During this time the two political leaders signed the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty. Both events were milestones for any President at the time. The growing relationship between Reagan and Gorbachev created a bond, which eventually led Gorbachev to institute a new spirit of openness and laid the structure for the downfall of the Soviet Union in the proceeding term of President George HW Bush.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with both countries were nuclear armed, it didnt help out at all, it just made things worse. There was a constant fear that, because there was not at the time a definitive World…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cold War, one of the most scariest times in America’s, or even the world’s history. The threat of nuclear war was real, very real. At any moment America or the U.S.S.R. could destroy the entire world with their assault of nuclear weapons, just at a call and a click of a button. This is one of many important times in history, and still affects us today. Not only did the North Atlantic Treaty Operation come from the tensions, but the bay of pigs, the cuban missile crisis, the berlin wall (the construction and demolition) all were the outcome from these tensions in which still affect us today.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1972 Women Good Or Bad

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In May of 1972, President Richard Nixon flew to Moscow. He met with the Soviet leader, Leonid Brezhnev, and other Soviet officials. After four days of discussion, the United States and the USSR reached many agreements, most importantly, the Strategic Arms Limitation…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Cold War happened between the years of 1945 through 1991. This war was between Russia and the United States sort of as a competition to see who would dominate the world. The end of the Cold War saw the fall of the Soviet Union which ultimately caused great problems in the Soviet Union . The Soviet Union could not keep the people happy and would not give then rights or material wealth. The aftermath of the Cold War continues to influence world affairs. [ http://millercenter.org/president/carter/essays/biography/5).…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem that had grown was who could get nuclear control, and who could develop new technologies quicker. It was also a time of trying to stop the spread of communism. This was known as the cold war and its effects are still seen in people to this day.…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The existence of nuclear weapons for better or worse have indubitably impacted our lives in one way or the other. There are the some who find these weapons to be singularly beneficial. For example Defence Analyst Edward Luttwak said “we have lived since 1945 without another world war precisely because rational minds…extracted a durable peace from the very terror of nuclear weapons.” (Luttwak, 1983). Moreover, Robert Art and Kenneth Waltz both extrapolate that “the probability of war between American and Russia or between NATO and the Warsaw Pact is practically nil precisely because the military planning and deployments of each, together with the fear of escalation to general nuclear war, keep it that way.” (Art, Waltz, 1983) Yet there are many who also share the view of Jonathan Schell who dramatically infers that if we, society, do not “rise up and cleanse the earth of nuclear weapons, we will “sink into the final coma and end it all.” (Schell, 1982) The central purpose of this essay is to challenge the conventional wisdom about nuclear proliferation; that nuclear weapons do indeed induce a greater stability amongst international politics however this does not justify countries to continue nuclear arms proliferation with seemingly no endless bounds. However despite this it is naïve to declare that a world without nuclear weapons would be without peace either. Nuclear weapons are more than just symbols of destruction and chaos but however hold far more important roles in international politics. They are at the forefront of national security and hold considerable importance in domestic debates and internal bureaucratic struggles and serve as international normative symbols of modernity and identity and as such have to be treated with utmost care and with a sense of supreme responsibility by countries that hold them.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays