Preview

Arguments for and Against Euthanasia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
459 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arguments for and Against Euthanasia
Arguments for Euthanasia

Arguments Against Euthanasia

Tremendous pain and suffering of patients can be saved.

If patients have a terminal illness that is extremely painful and will get progressively worse, Euthanasia could be the only way to take their pain away.

Vital organs can be saved, allowing doctors to save the lives of others.

When someone is so close to death, and another persons life is in jeopardy because of a failing organ, giving the person with the greatest chance of survival the mandatory body part would be best

Without physician assistants, people may commit suicide in a messy, terrifying, and traumatic way.

Since the the procedure Euthanasia is illegal, and if someones pain is so unbearable, they may take their own life to get out of the mess. Committing suicide usually isn’t done in a way that is “easy” or “organized”, and if one attempts on their own, it could turn out way worse than if there was doctor help.

People have the right to die.

One should have the freedom and choice to end their lives. Possession of this right is often understood to mean that a person with a terminal illness should be allowed to commit suicide or assisted suicide where their disease would otherwise end in the same result. If someone is mentally able to make the best decision.

Violate doctor’s Hippocratic Oath.

Before getting a medical degree, doctors must take an oath. In the oath is talks about not giving patients lethal drugs. Persuaded or not, they are not allowed to help with Euthanasia according to the Hippocratic Oath.

If legalized, Insurance companies may start recommending the assisted suicide procedure.

With greedy insurance companies,. if given the option to save money, they will take it. When a patient is so far gone, they think there is no point in keeping them alive because eventually they will pass. If Euthanasia is a choice, Insurance companies could they say they’re going to stop

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Not all terminally ill patients will choose this option, but it should be available for those who want it. Coping with the diagnosis of a terminal illness is difficult for both the patient and the patient’s loved ones and it only becomes more difficult as the disease progresses. Being given the ability to decide when to die allows the patient to feel a sense of dignity and control during a time when he or she may not have control over anything else in life. Not only does physician-assisted suicide provide a sense of relief to the patient, it provides relief to family and friends. Watching a loved one die is one of the most challenging things to endure in life. It only becomes more challenging when forced to watch a loved one die a slow and painful death. Physician-assisted suicide can provide closure to everyone involved in a situation dealing with a terminal illness; therefore, it must become legal in all fifty…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide

    • 2570 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Pain and suffering is unique to each individual. Even with excellent care, symptom management sometimes falls short in alleviating the suffering at the end of life. Only the individual can determine if he or she is able or willing to endure that suffering. In order to provide full autonomy and spectrum of choice for patients, physician-assisted suicide that is legal with standards of care to protect all parties should be in place.…

    • 2570 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The simple principles of medical ethics are “to avoid harm”, “to do well”, “the right to act freely”, and “acting fairly towards the patient”. Doctors should try to save patient’s life instead of ending it. They have the responsibility not to kill the trusting patients, but give all their best to secure the life of their patients. Even if the patients are hard to cure, they should still try and not make euthanasia an option. Therefore, doctors do not have the right to decide whether their patients would live or die as long as their patients are alive, there is always a hope for curing. For instance, many European countries are legalizing euthanasia. Unfortunately, not only doctors, but also nurses are favoring euthanasia in the extreme…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Hippocratic oath states “I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect.” (“Greek Medicine - The Hippocratic Oath." U.S National Library of Medicine. U.S. National Library of Medicine, n.d. Web. 29 Oct. 2016.) “The American Medical Association (AMA) policy states, "Physician-assisted suicide is fundamentally incompatible with the physician's role as a healer, would be difficult or impossible to control, and would pose serious societal risks.” (Pearson, John. "Point: Assisted Suicide Is Unnecessary." Points of View: Assisted Suicide (2016): 5. Points of View Reference Center. Web. 29 Oct.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In conclusion, if a terminal patient lives in steady anguish, he or she should not be forbidden to peacefully end his or her life with a doctor’s aid. Living in pain and practically waiting for death to arrive is not the way a human should spend their last couple months of life. Citizens with an incurable disease that progressively worsens should be able to die with dignity. If not these patients will spend their last days with complete misery and worry that death is not near enough. States throughout the country and the government need to revise their beliefs about an assisted death and consider the amount of benefits it provides life-threatening patients. Overall, Physician-assisted suicide should be an option for patients in more than…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A patient should have the liberty of choosing to end their suffering. Although, it may see has an extreme option, is an option the patient should have the right. However, some doctor think that Physician-Assisted Suicide goes against the oath they made. According to the article” Doctor-Assisted Suicide Pros and Cons List”, one of the con of this practice is “Violates the Hippocratic Oath”. Which was that every life is sacred, therefore, commanding respect. So, just because the patients give permission, doesn’t make killing right. Still, by respecting the patient’s wishes and taking him/her out of his/her misery, the doctor is respecting their life. Physician-Assisted Suicide helps the patients in many different ways like being prepare or ending their suffering. Physician-assisted Suicide helps them retain their dignity. Terminally ill, coma, or mentally competent patients are suffering every day. For some, the pain is so much, that they don’t consider themselves “living”. Physician-assisted suicide help patients properly said goodbye to their love ones at their own pace and at their own comfort. It gives them the opportunity to be surrounded by the people they love and the things they love. An article called “Doctor-Assisted Suicide Pros and Cons List” by Nyln.org, it stated that “Physician-Assisted Suicide makes grief easier to handle” (Nyln). Since, everyone its inform of the patient’s…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physicians assisted suicide can be defined as the voluntary termination of one's own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician (Snyder 2001). In order to truly explore the ethical dilemma of physicians assisted suicide we must first understand and grasp the base meaning of the term, as well as let go of any prior misconceptions we may have surrounding the topic. The process of physician-assisted suicide is different than you might imagine. Before I had researched this topic I had the inaccurate impression that physician assisted suicide was a procedure similar to that which you would imagine for an animal being put down or euthanized. As many of us unfamiliar with the topic might believe,…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many different organizations like the World Health Organization or WHO, are concerned that the nature of the physician - patient relationship will be irrevocably altered for the worse if physicians are given a license to “kill”. (Young). However, advocates for physician assisted suicide like Margaret Battin will argue that physicians whom alone society has entrusted custody of the means of ensuring a good death, have a positive duty to help terminally ill patients in intractable pain who wish to die, which is a duty grounded in the bioethical principles of beneficence and non-malfeasance (Young).…

    • 2509 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, people have the right to end their life when they choose because they do not want to suffer anymore. There are people in this world who live with a terminal illness knowing their days are numbered. Pain has been associated with death for a long time. No one, especially the people who are dying of an illness, want to die in pain. Patients tell doctors they would rather die at home than at…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In at least some cases, active euthanasia promotes the best interest of everyone concerned and violates no one’s rights, therefore, at least in some cases, active euthanasia is morally permissible.” (RSL/Rachels, EL 249) This is the strongest argument for active euthanasia in my opinion. Those who oppose this argument may claim that euthanasia is not in the best interests of all parties involved. The parties referenced are usually the friends/family/doctors and their grief over the situation or even the hospital and its shareholders losing money from the patient. First off, any person who wants to keep a family member alive who is in extreme pain for the sole reason of wanting to prolong being able to interact with them or to offset their own period of suffering following the family member’s death is incredibly selfish. The logical conclusion would be that family and friends of the patient would be relieved by their quick and early passing because of the avoidance of a month of suffering. Yes, of course the family and friends of the patient will experience emotional trauma from the passing of their loved one, but in due time the loved one you will pass whether they like it or not. Second, when it comes to financial losses to the hospital and its shareholders, those who would put monetary gain over the wellbeing of another human being have…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While I do not believe in assisted suicides, I do believe that a person has the right to die with dignity and free of pain if possible. This may entail pain medication, and anxiety medication being prescribed by physicians and administered by health professionals or family members. The use of Hospice services is also an option for some, but for a Hospice service to be offered there needs to be a great family support in place. Many people fear dying in hospitals and nursing homes, and would much rather be at home during this time.…

    • 286 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine laying in bed, unable to do anything for yourself; your quality of life is slowly diminishing to nothing. Now, imagine having the worst pain imaginable. This is what life is like when having a life threatening disease, like terminal cancer. Terminally ill patients have the most unbearable pain, yet have to die suffering. What if there was an option to end one's life with dignity, to be able to still make a choice while you could? This option is called physician-assisted suicide, and people should have the right to make this type of very difficult decision if ever needed to. It goes against the Hippocratic Oath a physician takes (www.pbs.org); but, this oath is not required for modern medicine schools. As long as a person is of sane…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is always a choice of physician-assisted suicide if the patient is breathing and of sound mind. Moreover, a patient having a less than ten percent chance of living, physician-assisted suicide should be an option. Physicians are healers of disease and injury, preservers of life, and relievers of suffering. Determining the ethical responsibilities of physicians when patients wish to die requires a close examination of the doctor’s role in society (JAMA, 1992-vol 267, No. 16).…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Doctors intentionally end the life of someone? Lately there has been major controversy surrounding the subject of physician assisted suicide. Some people think doctors should assist patients in committing suicide, however this is a terrible idea. Physicians should not assist suicide because the individual could eventually overcome the problem. Suicide is a permanent solution to a temporary problem.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Choosing the time to die is a very sensitive and controversial topic of around the world and as people suffering from terminal illness make the hard choices to seek an end to their suffering, governments debate the legality, ethics, and morality of physician-assisted suicide. As thousands of people around the world suffer from terminal illnesses, it is important to explore options that allow people to make the choice to die on their terms and physician-assisted suicide is one option for people looking to end their lives on their terms with dignity.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays