Morality of Abortion
For Abortion (utilitarian):
Anything having a net output of benefits with consideration of everyone is morally permissible [1, 7]. An abortion is a procedure to end a pregnancy and the procedure is performed by a licensed health care professional . Medical or surgical abortions performed in the first trimester do not significantly affect later infertility, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, or preterm or low-birth-weight deliveries, according to The Kaiser Family Foundation's statistics on abortion , and shows no greater risk of breast cancer, according to research from the National Cancer Institute . There is about 1 death per 100,000 legal abortions and the risk of complications from the abortions are rare, about less than 0.3% . In the question of whether fetuses can feel pain during an abortion, evidence from research concludes that “fetuses from 20-23 weeks do not feel pain”  - whereas abortions mostly occur before that time period . In conclusion, since the legal abortions are performed by a professional and the benefits outweigh the costs, abortion is morally permissible.
Against Abortion (kantian):
Killing an innocent human life form is wrong. The fetus is an innocent human life form, therefore it is wrong to abort the fetus . According to the Women's Center statistics, teenagers are more likely to delay having an abortion until 15 weeks of pregnancy, when the medical risks are greater . The federal law dictates that states cover abortions under Medicaid under cases of rape, incest, or life endangerment , but having wider access to contraception would be a better solution to the problem of abortion and enable private companies to take on the burden of the costs. A fetus “possesses a property, the possession of which in adult human beings is sufficient to make killing an adult human being wrong” . The arguments for abortion are apt to “'speciesism'”  because the arguments center around...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document