Preview

Arguments against Capital Punishment Debate

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
266 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arguments against Capital Punishment Debate
Arguments against the death penalty:
- Human life is too valuable for us to be killing simply for the sake of vengeance or deterrent
- Everybody has a right to live, be it the victim OR the murderer. A violation of that right should not result in another violation. Two wrongs don't make a right.
- Innocent people are likely to at some point receive the ultimate punishment - for a crime they have not committed. This is unacceptable and can be backed up with statistics from the USA (130 people since 1973 have been convicted of crimes they have not done and have been freed from Death Row.) These statistics do not highlight the stress and terror these people would have felt for being innocent.
- Two families will grieve, not just one. Surely that isn't worthwhile.
- Death is the ultimate punishment. A criminal will have no chance to show remorse, or to turn their life around. Surely everybody deserves a second chance?
- No other punishment fits the crime as well as the death penalty - a shoplifter is not burgled as punishment, a sexual offender is not raped as a punishment. Why should the murderers have such a more different penalty?
- Yes it's a deterrent, but at what cost? There is also no guarantee that crime numbers would decrease, only that conviction levels will. The cost of implementing each trial with the care it deserves and the cost of each execution outweighs any potential gain.
-And after all, does it really make us a civilized community that we like to insist we

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The death penalty has always been a controversial topic in the United States. It is outlawed in 16 states, but it should be abolished in all fifty states. The act of the death penalty is irrational, costly, inhumane, and religiously immoral. Taking an individual’s life, because he/she murdered someone is senseless and is not a good representation of the United States.…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people might agree with the death penalty. Families get devastated when someone they love and care about has died. Its different when that person they care so much about has been murdered or killed. People tend to hate that person and have the urge to do just about anything to them in order for them to suffer, which causes us to take, revenge on them. This matter has lead to the death penalty. This is a punishment that slowly kills the man or woman that has committed the crime. Why should we have pity on those who choose to kill? If they felt powerful enough to kill, then we should be able to do the same to them. Whatever their reason is that they choose to kill they should be punished someway, somehow.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Definitions For Ethics GCSE

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Some suggest that Capital Punishment is not the way to go as sooner or later people will get killed because of mistakes or flaws in the justice system, for example witnesses, prosecutors and jurors them being human can all make mistakes (Alexander Pope) “To err is human”. When these human mistakes are coupled with flaws in the system it is inevitable that innocent people will be convicted of crimes. Where capital punishment is used mistakes cannot be put right.…

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Such mistakes that have been made must be prevented for the future, so that the innocent don 't continue to suffer. In fact, the Innocence Project, an organization that emphasizes the faults in our death penalty system, states that the inmates falsely accused of their crimes "...were convicted in 11 states and served a combined 209 years in prison – including 187 years on death row – for crimes they didn’t commit." (Innocence Project). To be exonerated after years and years must leave unfathomable mental trauma. If that many innocent people have been forced to wait on the edge of death for this long, it wouldn 't be hard to believe that some won 't be lucky enough to be saved from the mistakes of our unacceptably inefficient court system. Killing a person, even sentencing them to death, is only just if they truly deserve it. That is what Dexter argues, yet our country continues to ineffectively implicate capital punishment by making the innocent suffer through unnecessary torture. We must end capital punishment, or at least make it more efficient. There are lives at…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion the death penalty violates the right to life. What is capital punishment? In its simplest form it is defined as the State, or Government of the time, legislating that premeditated murder is punishable by death. Capital punishment has not been proven to function as a deterrent. In this argument, I will put forward my case that the death penalty is immoral and has no place in civilised society.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Society demands that punishment should fix the harm it has done. By sentencing a person to death no harm has been fixed. As long as capital punishment exists in our society it will continue to spark the injustice, which it has failed to curb. The death penalty is morally and socially unethical, should be construed as cruel and unusual punishment, has no proof of acting as deterrent, and risks the appalling and unacceptable injustice of executing innocent people. It does not matter who does the killing as long as a life is taken by another, it should always be considered…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Innocent people that are found guilty for a crime and are executed as a result will suffer an infinite loss of welfare, leading to a fall in the level of optimal capital punishment (Cameron 1989). Not only this but it adds a cost to society as people will pay more to prove themselves innocent as the real offenders will gain because their expected probability of punishment will decrease; this is know as the innocence externality theory (Cameron 1989). Since the turn of the century it has been found that at least 23 people have been wrongfully executed (Giarratano 1991) with the possibility of more that are unknown, all of which will not be able to receive compensation in exchange for the wrongful doing. These mistakes have happened due to reasons including misleading and suppressed evidence, untrustworthy confessions, perjury, mistaken eyewitnesses, or an incompetent defence counsel (Giarratano 1998). Many of these mistakes could have been corrected with a longer execution delay, but legislation believed that lowering this delay has more of a positive impact on social costs and was therefore decreased in 1996 as stated above (Shepherd 1004). Even though capital punishment can decrease the crime rate, the risk of executing even one innocent person should be a large enough reason to consider implementing other forms of strict…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mb's Ideological Space

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Everyone has an inalienable human right to life, even those who commit murder; sentencing a person to death and executing them violates that right.…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty should still be used for the simple fact of the famous quote in the bible “An eye for and eye”. It is known that when someone kills someone or either steals they get what they have coming for them, but there are other ways to settle this that helps and seems right for everyone. Like if it something minor happens it does not have to go straight into severe punishment. There are even more ways to do something that makes everyone happy, they just have to compromise and figure it…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O 'Connor said in a speech in 2001 to a group of women lawyers in Minnesota "the system may well be allowing some innocent defendants to be executed” (“Innocence”). It has been said that if capital punishment disappears in the United States it won’t be because voters and politicians no longer want to execute the guilty (Douthat 7). It will be because they 're afraid of executing the innocent (Douthat 7). "A government that cannot guarantee the absolute accuracy of its proceedings should not take to itself the power of taking a human life," said Senator Martin Looney, referring to the Tillman case (Williams 55-56). While interviewing certain people about this issue there was a statement made by a person that really caught my attention she said “...The death penalty should not be a closure to a family because another person is being killed, when God should be the one making that decision. Remember, two wrongs don’t make a…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fallacies in an Argument

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I disagree with the authors reasoning because most of this argument is fallacious. Amidst the author’s over-generalization on what is suggested to be a problem among the “Innocent” and the “Murders”, there is very little clarification on what constitutes an innocent person from a criminal. The author gives faulty reasoning in stating that “the death sentence is obviously a moral and political issue” this statement falls under the category of begging the question. I found that the majority of the authors reasoning were based upon the fallacy of Ad-populum. In order to derive emotion from its audience the author implies that the benefits of having a fair system of crime and punishment the “killers” must be killed and the “innocent” will be protected. The author concludes that when “people start to open their eyes and realize that it is a life and death word out there” is how society can work for the betterment of humanity. This is a fasle-delema people have other options on how they want live their life besides living or dying.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In society today there are murders committed everyday. And everyday the people who commit these crimes are found guilty in a court of law and sentenced to like in prison. Some even get chances for parole. What the courts should do is take every murderer, give every one of them the death penalty, and follow through with it. The death penalty should be legal in all 50 states and carried through when given out as a sentence. Gary Gilmore faced a firing squad at the Utah State Prison on January 17, 1977. There have been 55 murders in that state during 1976. During 1977, in wake of the Gilmore execution, there were 44 murders: a 20 percent decrease. As you can see, the execution had some effect on the murder rate in Utah. There are very few proven facts about capital punishment deterring crime at this time. This is so because capital punishment is not used enough to actually have an effect on people. It is a fact that of all murder sentences that 38 percent get the death penalty. If that 38 percent only 0.1 percent are executed. If we use the death penalty more often and actually carry through with it will have an effect on the crime rate in the country. People will see that finally we have justice in this country and if they do this, there is a large chance they are going to be caught and they are going to receive the death penalty. We also need the death penalty in this country because if we execute the murderer that person has no chance to ever kill or harm another person again. The person will never have a chance for parole and there will never be a risk of this person ever ruining another family's life. It is not fair for a murderer to get life in prison. The murderer still can have a life, not much of one, but they do have one. He or she can still communicate with their families. The victim of the murder cannot. The victim's family will never be able to see there loved one again. Another thing with life in prison is that the murderer may have a chance for parole.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everybody believes in the death penalty. We just differ on whether the killer should die, or his next innocent victim. Even killers believe in the death penalty when they are taking away the life of an innocent person. When someone is sentenced to the death penalty the world is rid of a murderer, but a family is rid of a husband, wife, father, son or daughter. Even if someone is a close family member, if they have purposefully murdered one or more innocent people they deserve the death penalty.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not only is capital punishment fair but it also prevents criminals from committing their crimes again. The essay “In Defense of the Death Penalty” by Paul G. Cassell (2004) explains how capital punishment prevents criminals from committing their crimes again .Cassell writes about the criminal Kenneth Allen McDuff who raped, tortured and killed many women and teenagers. McDuff who said…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty also risks an innocent life being sentenced to death. Some who agree with the death penalty says that everybody makes mistakes and the death penalty should not be abolished for that reason (Stewart, 2008). Since life is the greatest thing that can be taken away from a person, one innocent life must not suffer death in place of the true criminal. When life is at…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics