Are the Classical Functions Put Forward by Henri Fayol in 1949 Still Valid and True Today?

Topics: Management, Project management, Henri Fayol Pages: 4 (1263 words) Published: March 24, 2013
Academics for years have been pondering the effectiveness of classical approaches to newer conceptualizations within management functions. Are the classical functions put forward by Henri Fayol in 1949 still valid and true today?, or are the theories put forward by other academics such as Mintzberg more valid?, or would the scientific type management concepts be more fitting?. To answer such questions this report examines two Journal journals, “Are the classical management functions useful in describing managerial work?” (Journal 1) and “Some effects of Fayolism” (Journal 2). By analyzing the different arguments put forward, I aim to conclude which theory is more appropriate to management study today. In journal 1, Carroll and Gillen examine newer conceptualizations of a manager’s job, and compare its findings to that of Fayol’s classical approach. The basis of this evaluation is to determine which approach is more useful in determining the role of management for the purpose of management education. Journal 2 draws on Fayol’s theory of a set of activities that are common to all organizations, to prove the developed management functions. It then evaluates and compares’ this notion with that of Fredrick Taylor with reference to management fashions to determine which theory is more accurate and relevant to managerial conceptualization today. Journal 1 merits Fayol’s theory, in referring to the significance it has had in studying management. In examining 21 books published from 1983 to 1986, he found that all books mentioned Fayol’s functions to some degree. Fayol’s four classical management functions (POLC): Planning, Organizing, Leading & Controlling, have been adopted as the foundation for management study for a long time. Upon evaluating Fayol’s theory, empirical studies expanded Fayol’s functions to eight functions, now known as the PRINCESS factors (planning, representing, investigating, negotiating, coordinating, evaluating, supervising and staffing). In...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Classical Management Theorists Frederick Taylor and Henri Fayol Essay
  • Henri Fayol Essay
  • Henri Fayol Essay
  • Essay about Life and Works of Henri Fayol
  • Henri Fayol S Six Function Of Managemen Essay
  • Is Classical Sociology Still Relevant Today? Essay
  • Henri Fayol`S 14 Law Essay
  • Managers: Classical Management Functions Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free