Preview

ARE MORAL VALUES OBJECTIVE?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1520 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
ARE MORAL VALUES OBJECTIVE?
Are Moral Values Objective?
“The Subjectivity of Values”, chapter 1 of John Leslie Mackie’s “Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong”, addresses the question: are moral values objective? Mackie opens with the simple statement that there are no objective values, a standpoint to which he gives the name moral scepticism. He goes on to clarify what he means by objective values, and distinguishing his moral scepticism from similar views. And finally Mackie presents the arguments in support of moral scepticism, in his error theory and the so called arguments from rationality and queerness.
To justify why it is important to address the question of whether moral values are objective, Mackie quotes three possible reactions to that very question: some may see it as an attack on morality and all that we value as humans, others that it is a question too obvious or trivial to justify exploring, or actually that it is just an empty question where no issue is raised at all. It is, according to Mackie, by the very fact these multiple reactions can be raised, reason in itself for the question to be explored further.
Moral Scepticism
What it is, and what it isn’t
Objective values do not exist, that is the thesis Mackie argues. And by values, not only is he referring to familiar moral values such as the moral good, rightness and wrongness, but also non-moral values such as aesthetics. He is careful to outline exactly what is meant by moral scepticism, where he is not concerned with first-order views on morality, first-order being views about what we ought to do morally, e.g. “torture is bad”. The 2nd order view which Mackie is concerned with and believes does not exist, refers to the nature of morality itself, whether it is part of the fabric of our universe, and how it relates to us. First and second order views are completely independent, and one can hold that second order views are false and still believe that first order views are true, and vice versa.
This does not mean to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ethical objectivism is the idea that all individuals are correct within their own ideologies, if and only if they justly believe them to be truthful. This idea only applies when the individual has not been exposed with external foundations that prove the inexactness of their claim. Mackie debated that the importance of our moral views were the foundations of the existence of objective moral values within ourselves, meaning that whenever we make a moral judgement we assume that there is an element that makes our moral sentence factual. Mackie also argues that at any time we make these moral statements we enter what is called the error theory, which is the thought that all moral proposals cannot be correct. Mackie determined that error theory was the only plausible metaethical model because it embraces the foundations and possibilities of moral values, while focusing on what morality truly is.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    J. L. Mackie claims that there are no objective values in the world that is to say that there are no such values that have been by default built into the structure of the universe. When Mackie claims that there are no objective values, he clarifies that his theory is not a first-order form of subjectivism or skepticism, but a second-order one. This means that his position is not one of a moral skeptic who would argue that we ought to reject all conventional moral judgments. According to Mackie, there are two things that are required for values to be objective:…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The philosophical study of moral judgments- value judgments about what is virtuous or base, just or unjust and morally right or wrong, morally sound or unfair or evil, morally proper or improper.…

    • 985 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Rachels, J. & Rachels, S. (2012). The Elements of Moral Philosophy (7th Ed.).New York, New York. Mc Graw Hill Companies, Inc.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moore attacks the naturalist perception of moral values, particularly in the naturalist definition of “good”. He argues that the word “good” is indefinable and is explained in his “open question argument”. This argument suggests that any definition should result in a closed question. For example, a bachelor is defined as an unmarried man therefore making it a closed question to ask whether a certain bachelor is unmarried, as the answer would only and always be yes. This question is a tautology and therefore a closed question. The same cannot be said of the proposition “all bachelors are ugly” because it leads to an open question, since the answer could be yes or no. this is because the meaning of ugly is not contained within…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mackie’s ‘Ethics: Inventing right and wrong’ critically assesses the idea that there are, or even can be, objective moral truths, and exposits Mackie’s ‘moral relativist’ stance. I intend also in this essay to criticise the idea of moral objectivity, and to deal with the objections that could be potentially raised to a relativist stance.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral values: The standards of good and evil, which govern an individual’s behavior and choices.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Ethics is a study of moral standards whose explicit purpose is to determine as far as possible whether a given moral standard is more or less correct (Manuel G. Velasquez, 2006)”…

    • 848 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    References: Rachels, S., & Rachels, J. (2012). The elements of moral philosophy (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas Evil Vs Evil Essay

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, his assessment that evil is accidental and has no intrinsic cause only appears to work conceptually as opposed to actuality. In J.L Mackie’s piece “The Subjectivity of Values” he makes the claim that there are no objective values. (Mackie 181) Mackie’s approach prefers subjectivity insofar as it relates to judgements and standards that one uses every day and in various situations. Mackie describes the subjectivity as “This action is right means I approve of this action” (Mackie 182), it can also be interpreted as I believe this action is morally right or wrong or “moral judgements are equivalent to reports of the speaker’s own feelings or attitudes.” (Mackie 182) In evaluating standards Mackie notes decisions made by judges or experts in certain fields about a variety of topics all of which have a subjective guideline detailing what is exceptional and what is subpar. Mackie however does argue that standards do bare relations to the work that is in question but standards are not concrete as a(n) (objective) rule would be. Mackie then argues similarly to Rachels, who will be introduced later, that moral values do not rely upon desires and this can work in Aquinas’s favor however, the argument as a whole does…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Therefore, although it is ‘wrong’, it is ‘right’ at the same time. This perplexing contradiction may lead Williams to claim that object-given reasons and Objectivism cannot force us to act if a contradiction between two or more moral truths is reached. If moral truths are objective, then they must be equally forceful. If two contradicting moral truths are reached, then no choice, action, or belief can be made. This would create a grave dilemma for Objectivists as a world where people would not be able to make choices would end intellectual progress and dehumanize people as a whole. Moreover, if a distinctive decision could not be made between two choices, the capability to make moral choices (a defining ‘human’ feature) would cease to…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic of Meta-Ethics pertaining to whether moral values are objective or subjective, and whether or not as a society we should be able to intervene on another society if we do not believe what they are doing is morally ethical, is quite a large topic. How can we come up with a solid answer as to whether or not there are universal human values, and whether certain things should be considered right for everyone are very difficult questions to answer, we must be wary as to not insult different cultures, religions and societies. It has been concluded that an objective reality cannot exist without a subjective reality, in order to reach this conclusion, we must first consider that morality is wholly subjective, if this is so, we cannot call anything wrong, what we believe is right or wrong is simply an individual’s opinion on a subject. As an example, if someone killed several children from an elementary school, if morality is subjective, all anyone is able to say is that from an individual perspective it was wrong, from the perspective of the killer it may have been (in their opinion) the highest moral good. However, if reality is objective, then we can say that what the killer did was wrong. If one believes that killing is something that is truly wrong, then you believe in objective moral value, and in that case one must ask; how far do objective morals stretch, and where do they come from? If one believes that the wrongfulness of killing is simply a matter of perspective, then one should ask; why does society have the right to tell me what to do if morality is merely a matter of perspective? We cannot truthfully choose one way to look at the world, because the world is not black and white, there are many grey areas and many exceptions people would have to their beliefs, because of this we cannot have an objective reality…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Contemporary philosophers such as, G.E. Moore, C.L. Stevenson, and J.L. Mackie, all have theories that develop different views concerning the status of moral judgments and the existence of moral facts. Moore, in his, Subject Matter of Ethics, argued that moral facts do exist and can be true or false but must be indescribable. Stevenson, in his, The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms, disagreed with Moore and said that moral judgements can’t be true or false they simply can inspire certain feelings of approval or disapproval in humans. Mackie, in his, The Subjectivity of Values, would disagree with both and say that there are no moral facts and that all moral judgments are simply wrong. It seems to be the case, on soundness alone, that Moore has…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Stephen R. Covey, values are internal and subjective, governing people’s behaviour.” (Stephen T. Covey, The 7 habits of highly effective people).…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Theory of Subjectivism

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rachels, James, and Stuart Rachels. The Elements of Moral Philosophy: James Rachels ; Sixth Ed. by Stuart Rachels. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2010. Print.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics