Preview

Are Apes Capable of Using the Language?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
865 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Are Apes Capable of Using the Language?
Are apes capable of using the language?

During the recent time frame scientists have shown that such mammals as chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans are capable of learning and using ASL (American Sign Language) and several artificial languages like, for example, «Yerkish.» However, there is a controversy in how far that ability of great apes spans. There are two different groups of researchers, experimenting with language and apes, those who are in favor of a «traditional» approach, and those who prefer a new, «modern» one. Most debates among them are about the questions
:
 Can great apes meaningfully relate words?
 Can apes create sentences?

Having in mind these two questions, I tried to find the answer using the literature written by researchers belonging to both «traditional» and «modern» doctrines.

Can great apes meaningfully relate words?

«Traditional» researchers believe that great apes cannot meaningfully relate words. They believe that apes just use words which are mostly liked by their trainers in each concrete situation, but they can be meaningless to apes. For example, «only 12 percent of utterances were spontaneous-that is, 88 percent were preceded by a teacher's utterance» (Herbert Terrace, 1979). In addition, a famous psychology professor at Columbia University, Herbert Terrace, argues that «even if an animal produced such a sequence» as «water bird,» «we could not conclude that it was a sentence» (1979). Moreover, «the words and word order may be meaningful to an English speaker, they may be meaningless to the animal producing them.» Not only Herbert Terrace, but also Duance Rumbaugh has argued: «apes spontaneously string word units (signs, lexigrams) together»(1979).
These two scientists proved their affirmations by experiments and, maybe, I, as a result, would believe them; however, there is another group of scientists who states that apes are capable of meaningfully relating words. This group of scientists is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chimpanzee and Animals

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many scientists have experimented with animals, to prove that they do have the capacity to communicate. For example, Beatrice and Allen Gardner trained a chimpanzee named Washoe to use about one hundred and sixty signs, including signs for “apple,” “tickle,” “flower,” and “more.” Washoe even learned to combine signs into simple phrasese, such as “more fruit” and “gimme flower.”…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Personhood for Primates

    • 2464 Words
    • 10 Pages

    "Primate Language Ability (sidebar)." Issues & Controversies On File: n. pag. Issues & Controversies. Facts On File News Services, 19 Jan. 2001. Web. 2 Dec. 2011. .…

    • 2464 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    DSE212 TMA 06

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There has been much debate and research undertaken by scientists and psychologists in order to ascertain whether there are qualitative differences between humans and animals. This essay will discuss some of the communication methods that animals use and whether these are comparable to human traits. In addition, it will be necessary to explore further whether humans are in possession of any distinctive characteristics which result in uniqueness. Furthermore, this essay will also consider the significance of the evolutionary process and conclude whether humans are indeed fundamentally different or alternatively merely a more sophisticated and advanced type of animal.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Genius

    • 862 Words
    • 6 Pages

    comprehension (Can apes comprehend abstract ideas? Are they able to apply previous knowledge to new situations?)…

    • 862 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    So an important thing to distinguish when examining ability of non-human primates with communication or language is the actual defined difference between language and communication, and exactly where the definite line of distinction might be separating the two, if there even is a line to be considered when looking at so many different animals. Non-human primates have been studied and observed for both communication and language capabilities and distinction is often necessary to understand what has been discovered and what can be discovered. Many researchers of non-human primates argue that they cannot and do not have the capability of language, while others believe that non-human primates do have language, or can be taught forms of language by humans. Some researchers, that believe that non-human primates do have language or can be taught language, realize that it may not be the same level of complexity as that of human language as a whole but that it is a simple but true language form nonetheless. The reality is the definition of language and communication are what truly can determine if research can show non-human primates having language and or the ability of learning human language when trained, so each research can have potentially a different…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Primate Evolution

    • 3741 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Complex behaviors and intelligence are the trademark of the primate order and this has been attributed in part to relative large brain to body mass ratio (Reader and Laland, 2002). Defining intelligence, however, is a highly problematic issue; an operational definition used points to the primary component of intelligence to flexible problem solving and the ability to cope with any difficult situations (Jerison, 1973). Arriving at an agreement for the driving factors favoring primate intelligence is very difficult. Many theories have been posed as selective mechanisms for the trends toward increased intelligence in primate evolution. Some emphasize complex ecological pressures, mainly foraging strategies as the primary forces driving an evolutionary increases in cognitive abilities, and other suggest that increased social complexity favored the evolution of primate intelligence (Tomasello and Call, 1997). Across the animal kingdom, brain size increases with increasing body size, however, despite the common scaling principle, brain size to body weight ratios differ from one taxonomic group to another (Jerison, 1973; Gould, 1975). In primates, for example, the brains of apes are generally larger relative to body weight than the brains of monkeys, whereas the brains of monkeys are larger than those of prosimians (Jerison, 1973). Structural differences are also apparent. In chimpanzees, a larger proportion of the brain is devoted to neocortex than in monkeys, who in turn have proportionately more neocortex than prosimians (Martin, 1990; Passingham, 1982).…

    • 3741 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Theory of mind

    • 2466 Words
    • 10 Pages

    ‘Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?’, they described experiments to assess whether the primate most closely related to…

    • 2466 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Language and Lexicon

    • 909 Words
    • 3 Pages

    SIL International. (2004). What is a lexicon? Retrieved on March 15, 2009 fromhttp://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsALexicon.htmWillingham, D., (2007). Cognition: The thinking animal. 3e.Chapter 8: Memory Storage. ISBN:0131736884 . Prentice Hall, Inc. A Pearson Education Company…

    • 909 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Order Primate Analysis

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the study chimpanzees and human children “respond in a similar manner when tested with different sounds and “lexigrams” (Koren). Consequently, the divergence occurred when children began to communicate through speech and researches belief this behavior in the article written by Dixon, Apes Cuddle Each Other like Humans, apes are reported to share concern with each other just like humans. Primates “kiss, hug and embrace each” other showing that monkeys are self aware and share the need for interaction very much like humans (Dixon). Younger primates chase and play with each other each other like human children do. In Dixon’s article, Monkeys who scream frequently and are not quieted by these emotional exchanges show less compassion for others. For these traits to be shared amongst primates through a common…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Stereotypes

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page

    You and a friend are in a zoo. You observe a cage with a leopard in it. Suddenly, the Leopard starts talking to you about the weather, and you are now conversing with her when you notice your friend talking to a chimp, about what he had for dinner. “Banana De’Light is what I had, how about you?” He says to your friend. You soon leave the zoo after making friends with all the animals. The End. That doesn’t sound like non-fiction to you, does it? That's because animals can’t talk. Even if you teach it to try to speak all its life, the animal will never learn to actually talk like a human. True they use their own “language” to speak in the wild, these are the reasons that animals will never learn to talk like humans.…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Another major similarity is the chimpanzee’s use of sign language. Goodall described how the chimpanzee, Washoe learned and used sign language very easily. For instance, when she was asked in sign language to get an apple in another room, even though she could not see it, she knew what it was and where to get it. Another chimpanzee named, Loulis can do fifty-eight correct signs just from imitating Washoe and other chimps. Although they could not learn how to speak, nonetheless, being able to do sign language means that their learning capacity is incredible and very similar to humans (Goodall…

    • 2379 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    (1) For years, scientists have attempted to teach animals to communicate, but for the most part, their efforts have failed. (2) In the 1950s, psychologists failed to teach a chimpanzee to speak, for the ape was able to grunt only a few words. (3) In the 1960s, however, a chimp named Washoe learned the sign language of the deaf. (4) Washoe came to understand hundreds of words, and he used them to communicate and express original ideas. (5) As it turns out, the great apes have the capacity to learn language, but they cannot speak. (6) This research proved that humans are not the only animals capable of using language; however, they are the most sophisticated users of…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    well. Therefore, the idea o f making a joint Nordic TPL study was based on a…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    H. neandertal speech capabilities have proven in recent years to be a task capturing much of the time and research of anthropologist. In the 20th century it was commonly thought that H. neandertal was too brutish and simple to have evolved into modern humans, and had very little modern behavior or capabilities. As the fossil record grew and the technology progressed the scientific community found evidence of modern behavior and possibly speech capabilities, that would portray H. neandertal as the advance subspecies he was instead of the brutish, unintelligent being that had been reinforced through the 20th century.…

    • 2384 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout many years of our existence, humanity has constantly questioned (and still continues to) “How have we come to be?” From Darwin’s single theory and after thorough and extensive research we have come to discover that we have evolved from an ape like species in which other apes have come from too. Scientists test different apes to see our similarities in behavior and see how our earliest ancestor may have acted like; some tests may be cruel and immoral. However, other people support the great ape project; a fight for rights and equality of apes. In…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics