Preview

APUSH Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
644 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
APUSH Essay
Pd. 4 APUSH DBQ Essay

Prompt: In the quote above, Abraham Lincoln expressed his goals for the reconstruction of the country as the Civil War came to a close. Analyze how successful reconstruction programs and political actions were in achieving Lincoln’s goals.

Abraham Lincoln, a man renowned for his involvement in the civil war and the reconstruction that followed the war’s lambasted segregation of brotherly blood, held an ideology regarding reconstruction that he wished to be upheld nationally. Lincoln’s bias, with its roots in the core of early humanistic values and union preservation, called for the national synthesis of the North and the South in the presence of benevolent and humanitarian efforts that would strive to “bind up the nation’s wounds.” However, regardless of Lincoln’s idealistic view of reconstruction, the events that followed his assassination, whether they were of political or social affiliation, generally served to contradict Lincoln’s peaceful philosophy on a grand scale. The first four words of Lincoln’s second inaugural address mention a lack of malice towards anyone during the process of reconstruction. This element of Lincoln’s reconstructive ambition had been disregarded and left as no more than an idealistic extremity following the actions of radical republicans and, on the opposite end of the spectrum, southern whites. Following the civil war, radical republicans insisted on the involvement of martial law in America’s southern, formerly confederate, states. With this, the southern states had been practically subjugated by the will of extremist republicans who vouched for the punishment of those who supported the Confederacy, thus displaying the North’s contempt for Southern actions. However, the neglect to Lincoln’s words persisted in the South as well as the North, with southern whites exhibiting malevolence towards blacks and northern whites to such an extent that they would commit atrocious acts in the name of white supremacy.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    From the time of Lincoln's inauguration in 1860 to the final withdrawal of union troops from the South in 1877, the nation of America had been one of great revolutions. There was constant development in this time both socially and constitutionally. For instance, some constitutional developments that irrupted conflict were the secession of the confederate states, the Emancipation Proclamation, the three civil rights bills, and the reconstruction. Some social developments that caused conflict were the Freedmen's Bureau, the Black Codes, and the Ku Klux Klan. It was a result of these developments that the Revolutions of the Civil War, Reconstruction, and the Redeemers would take place. The great change these revolutions brought about were vital in the development of this country…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    his 14

    • 906 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Compare and contrast proposed plans for reconstruction using Abraham Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address (Links to an external site.), his Last Speech (Links to an external site.), "The Politics of Andrew Johnson (Links to an external site.)," and Thaddeus Stevens's Speech of December 18, 1865 (Links to an external site.). How did these plans differ from each other in terms of slavery, race relations, and the treatment of the South and southern whites? How did differing visions and political approaches influence the clash…

    • 906 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Thesis

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This was well presented in his speech about unity. Stated in Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address “-to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace, among ourselves, and with all nations”. It is well known that Abraham Lincoln opposed slavery and felt very strongly about fair treatment to all. He believed that, even though the war and the conflicting morals that spawned it tore the country in half, the North and South had to be one unified nation. The very same unity that is heavily publicized in today’s government. Another important statement in Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address was “-let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation's wounds-”. This proved Lincoln obviously believed very greatly in peace, even before the war. As slavery was being legally abolished, he hoped the North and South would mend the rift caused by war and become one nation again despite their differences. Despite the hatred and conflict that started the war many years ago, his influence among many eventually affected the nation’s will to fall apart. As a result Lincoln's speech is widely regarded today as a demonstration of peace among the…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his second inaugural address in March 1865, Abraham Lincoln looked back at the beginning of the Civil War four years earlier "all knew," he said, that slavery "was somehow the cause of the war." This essay will endeavour to discuss the role of long term divisions caused by the slavery debate in the eventual outbreak of the Civil War. In doing so this analysis will encompass the period between the birth of the nation beginning with the start of the American Revolution in 1763 and the conclusion of the Civil War in 1865. This being a period in which the newly independent nation struggled with its state system, with each of the former colonies possessing the rights to a significant level of self-governance that inevitably led to disagreements and conflicts of interest. One such conflict was the disagreement over slavery which James Ford, like Lincoln, believes was crucial in creating a clear North-South divide that would eventually lead to the Civil War. Whilst recognising slavery’s overwhelming contribution to the outbreak of the American civil war in 1861, one must acknowledge alternative factors beyond slavery, which contributed to the nations descent towards armed conflict. Revisionists such as William Gienapp and William Freehling emphasise the political contribution to the outbreak of the war and the influence of sectional ideology on ante bellum politics. It was this differing ideology that created the tensions between Southern and Northern parties creating political chaos during the 1850s, the North believing they were attempting to save democracy whilst the South campaigned for increased States’ rights, all of which provoked the outbreak of war. As well as the long-term divisions over slavery and the short term political contributions to the outbreak of war, historians such as Charles and Mary Beard placed emphasis on the…

    • 4190 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As the only President to preside over an American Civil War, Abraham Lincoln entered the office of the presidency with mounting challenges ahead of him. The country’s overwhelming divide regarding the issue of slavery proved to be the central issue in the 1861 elections. President Lincoln’s strong resolve to reunite the union catalyzed a sharp shift in his beliefs regarding the weight of power in the executive branch, helping Lincoln strengthen the office of the Presidency like never before. This set a precedent for future Presidents, notably Theodore Roosevelt, whose legislation on big business and “speak softly and carry a big stick” methodology to foreign relations, while thoroughly of his own design, most certainly finds its roots in the empowered President Lincoln.…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil War Origins and Legacy

    • 2553 Words
    • 11 Pages

    References: America’s Reconstruction. (2003) People and Politics After the Civil War. Retrieved on August 18, 2008 from http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/reconstruction/introduction.html…

    • 2553 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Reconstruction

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Friday April 12, 1861, America embarked into war with its biggest adversary; America! The American Civil War broke out, and what was believed to be a quick battle by the North, turned out to be a long bloody four years and left the country devastated. President Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president of the United States, successfully lead this country through its greatest constitutional, military and moral crisis. Everything he did was in the best interest in preserving this nation to what it is today. If President Lincoln task of preserving the union would have failed, our nation would be a split nation today. All the events of the Civil War are what truly shaped the face of America today. The President knew that if he wanted to preserve this nation as a whole, not only would he have to win the war, but he would have to have a plan in place to immediately fix the nation to help it move forward from war. During his time in the white house and towards the end of the war, when it was evident the North would prevail, he worked on a reconstruction plan to get the South up and moving. During the war, the northern armies had gone through the South destroying everything that would help the south to prevail in the war. The agricultural belt that was the strength of the was nothing more than ashes as the North marched his armies from Atlanta to the Sea, famously known as Sherman’s March, in which they destroyed everything from crops to railroads. After four long years of war, on April 10, 1865 General Lee surrendered, and the Civil War came to an end. Lincoln was preparing to move the nation forward in Reconstruction. The President, however, never saw his plans for Reconstruction in America because on April 14, 1865, he was assassinated, leaving Andrew Johnson to take over as President,…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abraham Lincoln Summary

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The book Abraham Lincoln, written by James M. McPherson, constitutes not only Abraham Lincoln’s life, but also his remarkable presidency. Abraham Lincoln was the sixteenth president of the United States. He also was considered a peacemaker because his passion was to follow God’s law and create every man to be equal. During Lincoln’s first term of presidency in 1860-1864, he followed his passion by abolishing slavery, otherwise known as the Thirteenth Amendment. Following his first term, his second term’s goal is now known as the Fifteenth Amendment. To say the least, McPherson argues the brilliancy of Abraham Lincoln’s ideas and the colossal contribution Lincoln had regarding the United States of America.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War DBQ Essay

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” This statement that created by President Abraham Lincoln demonstrates the necessity of the Civil War. If the United States were to remain divided, the strength of these two nations would be degraded and allow the continuation of an immoral practice; slavery. “Politicians, business leaders, newspaper editors, and others desperately sought a last-ditch compromise that would keep other states from following South Carolina...no compromise on Earth could reverse the election of Abraham Lincoln and the Southern fears of a “Black Republican” administration” (Roberts 50). As various groups split within the nation, the…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abraham Lincoln’s star shined when his administration took place during the Civil War proving excellency in both politically and rhetorically. From that war the 16th president got his most famous nick name as the Great Emancipator that dwells between Americans till the present day. However, history doesn’t say quit the same about the complete representation of Abraham Lincoln’s attitude towards the war and even the issue of slavery. Such a title proposes an acceptance that the civil war was a war for abolishing slavery and freeing the slaves under the lead of a free man who is motivated by the moral code of equality between blacks and whites. The sentiment about slavery was totally different than today’s. Slaves were private property and not even considered as human beings who have lost rights as Americans. Actually, slaves were a joker in the pack to both Northerners and Southerners. Saying all this make the slavery issue seems the cover of the civil war. Therefore, the goal of this chapter’s second section is to examine whether slavery was used only as a front image to fulfil a higher aim and securing the country from the danger that disturbed it with the threat of dissolving the union.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ulysses S. Grant delivers his inaugural speech while America still battles with the issues brought on by the Civil War. The American Civil War tore the nation in two, leaving behind a detached set of people who needed a leader in order to regain their nation’s unified greatness. In this speech, he uses rhetorical strategies to reassure the audience, the entirety of the United States of America, that he is that great leader who will work to the best of his ability to unite the North and South once again. He does this by trying to establish credibility with the audience, alluding to the Civil War, and using a determined tone.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APUSH Ch 15 Essays

    • 971 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Compare and contrast Lincoln’s views on the federal Union with nullification theory found in Document B. Chapter 10, page 189.…

    • 971 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the ironies of the Civil War era and the end of slavery in the United States has always been that the man who played the role of the Great Emancipator was so hugely mistrusted and so energetically vilified by the party of abolition. Abraham Lincoln, whatever his larger reputation as the liberator of two million black slaves, has never entirely shaken off the imputation that he was something of a half-heart about it. "There is a counter-legend of Lincoln," acknowledges historian Stephen B. Oates, "one shared ironically enough by many white southerners and certain black Americans of our time" who are convinced that Lincoln never intended to abolish slavery--that he "was a bigot...a white racist who championed segregation, opposed civil and political rights for black people" and "wanted them all thrown out of the country." That reputation is still linked to the 19th-century denunciations of Lincoln issued by the abolitionist vanguard.…

    • 5760 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War Draft Riot of 1863 shocked the history of the United States as one of the “bloodiest riots of American history.” (Man, Jr, 1951 p.375) Following the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 passed Abraham Lincoln had hopes that the passing of said law would “raise the morale of the union army, and send freed slaves across the border between the north and south to fight against the confederacy.” (Dupree & Fishel, Jr, 1960 p.472) The Emancipation Proclamation was also intended to “revitalize pro-Union opinion in France and England.”…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fate of Their Country

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "To locate the most direct causes of the American Civil War," he contends in the preface, "one must look at the actions of governmental officeholders in the decades before that horrific conflict." Professor Michael F Holt needs no introduction among historians. He is single handedly regarded as one of the scholars who is most responsible for the emergence of what some call a neo-revisionist interpretation and outlook about the origins and circumstances that resulted in the Civil War. His ideas which are reflected throughout his books especially “The Fate of their country” emphasize that the reasons which caused The Civil War could have been and should have been averted. Defending this ideology Holt criticizes historians who stand by their argument of “Sectional conflict over slavery and slavery extension caused the Civil War”. Instead he preaches throughout his works that include many influential books including “The Fate of their Country” that, contingent political factors played a very huge and predominant role is stimulations factors causing disunion among the states.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays