Ap English and Composition Synthesis

Only available on StudyMode
  • Download(s) : 58
  • Published : May 7, 2013
Open Document
Text Preview
ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION
SECTION II
Total time -1hr 15min

Question 1
(Suggested time- 45 minutes. This question counts for one-third of the total essay section score.) Directions: The following prompt is based on the accompanying five sources. This question requires you to synthesize a variety of sources into a coherent, well-written essay. When you synthesize sources, you refer to them to develop your position and cite them accurately. Your argument should be central; the sources should support the argument. Avoid merely summarizing sources. Remember to attribute both direct and indirect references.

Introduction
President Barak Hussein Obama tends to be the most influential president in the United States of America in comparison to the last recent presidents. However, some feel like he is taking his job seriously enough. Irresponsibility is not an exception while trying to lead a country. Assignment

Read the following sources (including the introductory information) carefully. Then, in an essay that synthesizes at least three of the sources, develop a position about what issues should be considered most important in making decisions as the president of the USA. You may refer to the sources by their title’s (Source A, Source B, etc.) or by the descriptions in the parentheses.

Source A (Teuxeira)
Source B (Peek)
Source C (Photo)
Source D (Fein)
Source E ( Ivanov)

Source A
Teixeira, Ruy. “Good Speech, Bad Strategy Obama's State of the Union doesn't bode well for his coalition” 13 Feb. 2013.

Source A
Teixeira, Ruy. “Good Speech, Bad Strategy Obama's State of the Union doesn't bode well for his coalition” 13 Feb. 2013.

The following is from the web page of a person dedicated to Obama.

The Obama team is not unaware of [these necessities]. But the strategy they've developed to address them isn't entirely adequate. It seems to consist of emphasizing particular fights like immigration reform, gun control, same sex marriage, and climate change that appeal most strongly to different elements of the Obama coalition. This strategy does have merit. The thought is that even if all these fights don’t yield legislative victories (and they won’t so long as Republicans control part of Congress), they will nevertheless serve to generate more enthusiasm among key parts of the coalition, without imposing much of an electoral cost. Moreover, these fights are all substantively important in policy terms, so any victories attained will be important breakthroughs.

But the strategy has serious limitations. To begin with, even if these issues do little damage to Democrats’ standing among white working class voters, they will also do little to win their support. These voters are primarily looking for material improvements in their lives, improvements that are not possible without strong economic growth and the jobs, tight labor markets, and rising incomes such growth would bring. In a low-growth environment, these voters will remain exceptionally pessimistic and inclined to blame Democrats and government for their lack of upward mobility.

Even more serious, core groups of the Obama coalition will be weakened by continued slow growth. Obama was well-supported by these groups in 2012, but a sluggish economic environment, where unemployment continues pushing 8 percent, will try these voters’ patience. How much enthusiasm will Hispanics, blacks, youth, single women, etc., whose unemployment rates are considerably above the national average, continue to have for a party that cannot do more to improve economic conditions? Attrition in support will be inevitable in such a scenario and the opportunity to consolidate a dominant coalition will be lost.

Source B
Peek, Liz. “President Obama has abandoned America's unemployed” 1 Feb. 2013.

Source B
Peek, Liz. “President Obama has abandoned America's unemployed” 1 Feb. 2013.

The following is from an online article.

The most recent news...
tracking img