Preview

Anwar Sadat Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
385 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Anwar Sadat Essay
In your view, how have rhetorical techniques been used to reveal memorable ideas in the speeches set for study?
Support your view with detailed reference to at least TWO of the speeches set for study.
Great speeches combine rhetorical techniques and structuring to reveal and emphasise their key themes and memorable ideas. This is evident in Anwar Sadat’s “Statement to the Israeli Knesset all of which present ideas memorable in both their original contexts and to contemporary audiences.”, Paul Keating’s “Funeral Service of the Unknown Australian Soldier” and Sir William Deane’s “On the occasion of an ecumenical service for the victims of the canyoning tragedy”,
One of Sadat’s most memorable themes is the value of “permanent peace based on justice”. Sadat employs a range of rhetorical devices such as emotive language, repetition, enumeration, imagery and juxtaposition to ensure his audience is convinced of the value of “permanent peace based on justice” and remembers the idea. Words such as “annihilate”, “bereavement” and “rejection” are used to force his audience to experience how it feels to live without “permanent peace based on justice”. The repetition of the phrase emphasizes that this idea is one of his key concepts, and also allows the phrase to be brought up again in the audiences mind allowing the concept to ‘sink in’. Sadat also uses accumulation, structuring his arguments as “the first fact”, “the fifth fact” etc, and later, when stating his conditions for peace he uses “first, second, third”. This technique allows his audience to better follow his train of thought and clearly understand how he has come to these conclusions and making his argument seem more logical and correct. Also, by stating his arguments as a “fact” he gives them more authority. Lastly, Sadat uses imagery to portray two possible futures. One is of “the ruins of what mankind has built and the remains of the victims of mankind”; the other is of “a smile on the face of every child

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    ¨Oh yeah, I love that speech! It has such a profound meaning. ” These words aren't often spoken, but when they are, the person saying it, without a doubt, means it. What makes a speech so memorable? Is it possible to find similarities between two completely different speeches, such as; Abraham Lincoln’s “Gettysburg Address” and Emma Watson’s “Gender Equality is your issue, too” speech? A speech is a formal address or discourse delivered to an audience; however, it may seem to be a jumble of words spoken out loud, if it is not potent and meaningful. The use of rhetorical devices, persuasive techniques, and rhetoric appeals makes a speech memorable because they trigger emotions and engross the audience into each and every word. Abraham Lincoln’s…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout history, the language of rhetoric has been harnessed and manipulated by public speakers throughout the world in order to effectively address key issues surrounding society and politics. The proposition that the enduring appeal of a speech lies in its ability to challenge and inspire is clearly demonstrated in both Anwar Sadat’s “Statement to the Knesset” (1977) and Paul Keating’s “Funeral Service for the Unknown Soldier” (1993). It is indeed the rhetorical treatment of the widely debated values in these speeches- whether it be for peace between two nations or simply the need for a stronger sense of national identity- that makes both these texts so influential in their enduring appeal.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Will goes on to ask what would happen if a president delivered a speech like that today. The audience would quickly become confused, bored and restless. He concludes the path of distinguished communication through speech and writing has declined since 1789. He explains there were no televisions for world to watch the address but simply an audience in the room who had no difficulty following his words. This is because they learned complex structures and well formed sentences from very different reading materials than us today. They grew up on material such as King James Version of the Bible and Thomas Cranmer’s book of Common Prayer and John Bunyan’s “Pilgrims Progress”. There mentality, as he suggests unlike ours, “Has not gone flaccid from a steady diet of advertising, situation-comedy repartee and “see Spot run” journalese.”…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Module B Speeches

    • 1177 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Powerful speeches affirm universal values which remain prevalent in human nature’s aspiration to productively approach the future. Noel Pearson’s speech “An Australian history for us all” (1996) and Anwar Sadat’s “Statement to the Knesset” (1977), through effective use of rhetorical devices, creates textual integrity to explore visionary ideas: establishing the need for change by examining “the past, with all its complexities”, and that in overcoming past conflict and uniting for a common goal, a “bold drive towards new horizons” may be undertaken.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Margaret Atwood’s Spotty-Handed Villainesses (1994) and Anwar Sadat’s Statement to the Knesset (1977) are both speeches worthy of critical study because of their fascinating ideas and values.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Undoubtedly, a speaker moulds his/ her speech by the principles of purpose, and the audience who are to receive the given speech. More than this however- the responder’s context also shapes the way in which they interpret a speech. Michael Douglas- famed actor and movie director, contrasts an audience’s response in his quote, to emphasise that a responder’s context is vitally significant. The speeches “Faith, hope, reconciliation” and “An Australian history for us all,” written by Faith Bandler and Noel Pearson respectively- draw many similarities and contrasts with regards to issues raised, audience, intention and context. Both acclaimed speakers articulate their speeches through the use of various rhetoric devices, tones and stylistic techniques in order to appeal to their audience.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    module B essay

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Speeches form an interpretation of historical events and values which are moulded around the speaker's opinions and ideology. Paul Keating's 'Funeral Service of the Unknown Australian Soldier' 1993 and Noel Pearson's 'An Australian History for Us All' 1996, demonstrate a contrast between how a historical and contextual understanding of these speeches helps create the necessary apperception on the given audience to convey the speaker's message appropriately. Despite the fact that both speeches were given in the mid 1990s, they were addressed to different types of audiences; Pearson's being delivered to a small, highly academic audience, while Keating's was broadcasted to the entire nation. They also addressed differing topics addressing patriotism within Australian society; the history of Indigenous mistreatment, and Australian participation in war, and were therefore perceived quite individually.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lou Gehrig’s speech that he gave on Appreciation day in 1939 was a great example of rhetoric and all the things that have to be in it.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The paralyzing powers of speech often engulfs the human mind and corrupts it to the will of the speaker. Omnipresent in society, rhetorical appeals, the appealing powers of speech, are made to project the speaker’s thoughts and ideas of a subject matter. From ordinary conversations to commercial advertisements to public addresses, appeals are present to influence an audience’s mindset. The appeal of Logos creates compelling evidence for the audience to develop conclusions in the speaker’s favor while the appeal of Pathos relies on morals, values, and emotions to create a response from the audience. Combined with the appeal of Ethos to establish credibility in the speaker, the appeals are potentially powerful enough to cause everlasting impacts on society and revise history itself. Throughout history, great orators such as Hitler, Martin Luther King, and other political leaders have used the power of speech to transform people’s thoughts and ideas. This practice has dated back to ancient times to Mark Antony at the funeral of his friend and mentor, Julius Caesar. In William Shakespeare’s Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony establishes himself to his audience, the plebeians, with Ethos then uses Pathos to pull on the audience’s heartstrings and sway the plebeians’ beliefs with Logos in an attempt to make the audience doubt Brutus’s justification of killing Caesar because he was ambitious.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Speeches Essay/

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An intrinsic connection between reality and what can become reality is made obvious by notions presented through rhetorical devices. This is seen in Anwar Sadat's speech "Statement to the Knesset", through a succinct presentation that remains strong without a sense of belligerence, allowing in tern for a sense of unification and a call for peace. He accomplishes this throughout the speech by escalating his tone alongside constant frequent reference to religion, grouping Islam, Christianity and Judaism together in his plea for peace "We all, on this land, the land of God; we all, Muslims, Christians and Jews, worship God and no one but God." which brings a great sense of unity especially through the use of the inclusive "we all" phrase. This is somewhat the reality of the situation, but does not manifest itself enough (in Anwars belief) within the social consciousness - so it ends up being the possible. This is furthered at the conclusion of the speech, through the utilisation of the personal pronoun of "I" and the inclusive "we" repeatedly. This choice of language contributes strongly to the escalating strength of the speech by pulling the audience in as one, achieving a sense of unification. He believes it is possible that complete unity can be achieved, and he is attempting to attains this unity within his speech. So an intrinsic connection between the actual and the possible revealed through the development of ideas in the speech. This is presented and made stronger through the rhetorical devices.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout time society has been presented with very unique and moving leaders who have successfully delivered speeches that will remain timeless and invaluable due to their powerful themes and beliefs portrayed within them. Speeches such as Faith Bandler’s “Hope, Faith and Reconciliation” and Anwar Sadat’s “Statement to the Knesset” will always remain significant within society and will never become dependent on shaping today’s society but be a memory of our past and a reminder of who we are today. Only very few texts still remain today that are highly regarded as being timeless and have the ability to still be understood in today’s society. I believe this is attributed to the underlying significant themes and ideas such as justice that will continue to appeal to people and allow them to sympathise with the author disregarding the time period. The themes behind the everlasting texts give the audience to have a universal perception and interpretation that can differ depending on external factors and ways of life. Another important reason of why I believe these texts have the ability to shape our interpretations of them are because of the pivotal nature and characteristics that the speeches hold in our past that has developed and crawled into our future.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    I have selected two speeches both of which I felt were written to connect with their audience and be persuasive. The first speech by indigenous Australian rights activist Faith Bandler, is aptly named “Faith, Hope and Reconciliation” 1999, the second speech is “Funeral Service of the Unknown Australian Soldier” presented by the honorable Paul Keating, 1993. In the following case study I will be exploring and reviewing and evaluating the intellectual and artistic qualities of these two speeches, with reference also to Sir William Deane’s speech on the canyoning tragedy of 1999.…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle, although having lived thousands of years ago, continues to make an impact in our society with his contribution to Western thinking and his famous "art" of rhetoric. He remains to this day, one of the most influential philosophers in the history of rhetorical study. One of his most prominent works is his "Rhetoric", a book that "confronts scholars with several perplexing questions" (Herrick 74). "Rhetoric" is divided into three books that discuss the "domains of rhetoric, the rhetorical proofs that Aristotle is so famous for and matters of style and arrangement" (Herrick 74). One of the most important contributions of Aristotle 's "Rhetoric" is his idea of artistic proofs, which are used to persuade an audience. Since developed in the fourth century BC, these proofs still continue to be utilized by rhetoricians to this day through the Aristotelian method. There are three components that comprise the artistic proofs. These are "(1) logical reasoning (logos), (2) the names and causes of various human emotions (pathos), and (3) human character and goodness (ethos)" (Herrick 82). Although all parts of his work are instrumental to rhetoricians and scholars everywhere, I will focus on the profound impact of Aristotle 's "artistic proofs" to the art of rhetoric and use Franklin D. Roosevelt 's December 8, 1941 "Declaration of War" speech as an example of how they 're put into practice as a persuasive mechanism in today 's postmodern society.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the years, 1863 and 1865, Abraham Lincoln gave two of the most powerful speeches in history. The first speech, “The Gettysburg Address”, was an empowering piece that gave comfort to the public when the Union most needed it. The other speech, “The Second Inaugural Address”, was an influential speech about Abraham Lincoln returning to office for a second term. Both speeches, utilizes rhetoric through the use of ethos, logos, and pathos to support Abraham Lincoln’s viewpoints of the Civil War.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Le Guin effectively empowered her audience to think and speak for themselves. The use of rhetorical appeals and devices was expertly placed to convey her opinions and key points. The audience was effectively caught listening to the repetition of key points while feeling the emotion from the pathos used. Logos and Ethos were also used to create a reliable reputation for Le Guin. Le Guin achieved the goal of her speech thanks to her use of key rhetorical devices and appeals. This speech will continue to be read and studied due to Le Guin’s brilliant use of rhetorical devices and…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays