Preview

Anna Karenina: Variety of Depictions of the Peasantry Class

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
561 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Anna Karenina: Variety of Depictions of the Peasantry Class
Through the acclaimed novel Anna Karenina, the audience experiences a variety of depictions towards the peasantry class. These interpretations are shown in Anna Karenina, through the characters Levin and his brother Nikolai. As stated in the Russian review, written by Alexandra Tolstoy, the audience is shown the opinion Tolstoy had towards these particular people. “Peasants were the real people- those who work with their hands and feed the world with what they produce” we learn through this article that despite all-else, he shared a love and an extraordinary interest. “(Tolstoy) is attached to the peasantry as to a woman expecting a child.”

This novel is based on the historical events that were taking place in Russia in the 19th century; readers go through extensive passages in the novel devoted to Levin and farming. In the 19th century, many believed that farmers and shepherds were more fulfilled and happy than their urban counterparts, showing closeness to the soil as a mark of the good life. “Farmers understand growth and potential, and are aware of the delicate balance between personal labor and trust in the forces of nature.” Through Levin, Tolstoy depicts the peasantry as everyday people. Levin feels they are neither different nor special to any other person from any other class. “He became furious with them for their carelessness, slovenliness, drunkenness and lying.” People from the higher society viewed the country as a place of leisure and peace, whereas Levin saw is as a place of labor, he had a close familiarity with the peasants “considering himself part of the peasantry… and could not contrast himself to them,” making him critical of them at times. “ He loved and did not love the peasantry.”

Another opposing observation of the Russian peasantry was Levin’s brother, Sergei Ivanovich. Ivanovich “loved and praised country life in contrast to the life he did not love” so therefore he loved the peasantry in contrast to the class of people he did

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Womens History Lit Review

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages

    To form the basis of her analysis, Orleck looks to the social world of eastern European women in the late nineteenth century. As young girls, Newman, Schneiderman, Cohn, and Lemlich, were exposed to Marxist ideas of socialism and a revolutionary spirit which touted a faith in progress and the belief that political commitment gave life meaning. The girls were also taught that gender, class, and ethnicity were fundamental social categories and are essential building blocks for social change. With this education, came the class-awareness which is inherent in socialist teachings, specifically Marxism. In addition, they were informed by the…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peasant’s lives consisted of usually working all day long and sometimes into the night. Their job was not only to provide for their family but if ordered they had to give their crops away. If they could not provide the crops they were beaten and sometimes killed for this. From…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History 102

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On the other hand Lesley A. Rimmel argues that after the Russian Revolution things remain unfinished for women who were mobilized as producers and reproducers for a mal political agenda. To support her theses Rimmel talks about her personal experience and being a longtime student of the USSR and Russia (Mitchell & Mitchell 184). She tells us how these “books” indicate that women…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this time period the ruling elite, who made up 1.1% of the population despite owning 25% of the land, maintained constant support of the Tsar. This support was based on reliance in the Tsars rule in order to ensure their own aristocracy. The nobles controlled the land Therefore through the nobility’s control of land and as a result the means of production, the Tsar had autocratic power over the majority who worked this land; the peasants, both of state (32.7%) and through the nobility 50.7% as despite the emancipation of serfs in 1861 the lives of these peasants were heavily restricted and reliant on the land owners through the Mir, censorship, tax and redemption payments, of which many could not pay for and so were forced into debt. the peasants themselves, being both restricted in the Mir and due to their traditional attitudes and acceptance of social situation, what Marx would call a lack of revolutionary consciousness, can be attributed to the Tsarist survival.…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead of simply accepting the alternative to foreclosure, she cries, “I can’t conceive a life without the cherry orchard, and if it really must be sold, then sell me with the orchard” (Chekov 1651), showing that she’d do anything to remain with the orchard and avoid chopping it down. Madame Ranevsky’s link to her land leads us to question whether she is holding on to the plot of land for the beauty of the orchard, or rather for the memories and nostalgia attached to the property. For example, the drowning and death of her son on the property ties her to the land, as she views the cherry orchard as a place where her son is with her. Madame Ranevsky asks Trofimov- an eternal student who lives in the village- to help her keep her land, repeating that her “son was drowned here,” asking him to “have pity on [her], good, kind man” (Chekov 1651). Additionally, Madame Ranevksy’s lineage is represented on the property, as she was raised on the land herself as a member of the Russian aristocracy, and established her family on the orchard. Thus, it’s clear that human experience within the natural world leads to a strong attachment and reliance on it, and Madame Ranevsky’s madness regarding the sale of her land is arguably due to her experiences on it. Because she shares the land with so many loved ones, Madame Ranevsky’s struggle to adapt to a changing world is intensified.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “‘All happy families are alike, all unhappy families are unhappy in its own way’ is the first line of Anna Karenina and, like any self respecting concierge, I am not supposed to have read it … for although common people may be sensitive to great works though they do not read them, literature, in the presence, cannot aspire to the lofty…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The social structure of 1800’s Russia was a rigid hierarchy. According to the 1879 census 82% of the population were peasants, 4% was the working class, 1.5% were the middle classes, and 12.5% were the upper classes. The peasants were small farmers that used outdated methods. They were mostly former serfs that were freed in the 1861 serf emancipation under Alexander II.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ivan Ilyich Thesis

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. Tolstoy describes Ivan Ilyich’s desire to conform to the standards of his society and his belief that he was leading right life.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, “Cinderella and Princess Culture”, Peggy Orenstein, a contributing writer for New York Times Magazine, explores the successful “princess” market and how it negatively impacts young children. Orenstein claims that the princess culture promotes a common gender stereotype of women to young children, especially young girls; therefore, society should lessen the encouragement of being a “princess” and fortify their promotion to a more strong-willed role model (327). Although the article contains evidence to support her claim, Orenstein is unsuccessful because of the use of her biases and opinions placed throughout the article, that expresses her own negative views toward princesses and the feministic reinforcements she makes on her own daughter.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan Ilyich

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Blake Charlton and Abraham Verghese, two Stanford professors, explains that “as a peasant, Gerasim accepts death as natural. He would not understand the middle class refusal to acknowledge death” (94). Without the blinders of money and social rank, Gerasim can grasp the entire situation about life as Ivan cannot. Gerasim’s poverty comes as an advantage “because his status enables him to spend more conflict-free time with Ivan Ilyich” (Charlton et al 94). The most symbolic representation of the anti materialistic message in Tolstoy’s piece is in the circumstances leading to Ivan’s death; while Ivan was decorating his new house with expensive furniture, he slipped and “knocked his side against the knob of the window frame” (WLB 753). Ivan’s materialistic nature is what eventually kills him. These examples are what define the message of simplicity when it comes to materialistic possession and social…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marya eventually meets and falls in love with Nikolai. At a key moment in their relationship, Marya perceives his inner struggles and directly addresses them. Doing so jolts Nikolai out of his cynical stupor, and “For a few seconds they looked silently into each other’s eyes, and the distant and impossible suddenly became near, possible, and inevitable” (1144). In all of this, we see how Tolstoy develops Marya into a strong and capable woman. Her relationship to her father, does not define her development as a woman and as her own person.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Death of Ivan Ilyich,” the author Leo Tolstoy attempts to describe the social status of Russia in the 19th century. Tolstoy uses realistic writing techniques to vividly and profoundly depict the inner feeling of a dying man by describing the protagonist’s words and behavior. Through narrating the death of one ordinary official, he exposed hypocrisy, indifference, and lack of faith between man and man. Tolstoy shows that people always pursue decorum and propriety, but they reject the idea of death and avoid talking other bad things which be identified as impolite. Everywhere in this story, the reader can see that all the characters except Gerasim spent their time running after fame and money. Ivan Ilyich also desires for decorum, propriety, and pleasantness during his whole life. One image that…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    His family beings to make the trip back to Moscow, begging for money along the way. Peasants' view of the peasantry is depiction of hate, anger, and spitefulness. In no way would the savages represented in the novel be seen as the key to Russian…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ivan Ilyich Suffering

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Tolstoy incorporated this in “The death of Ivan Ilyich” by describing a middle class man who lived “the most simple and most ordinary and therefore most terrible” life. In doing that, it reflected his novel with the writing style of…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ‘It’s Tolstoy by the way; I say as I open, the open door. He turns around. What? Shut up, I tell myself. Shut up the writer of Anna Karenina. Not Trotsky. Trotsky was revolutionary who was stabbed with a pickaxe in Mexico 1939. But I understand how the T thing could confuse you. He looks at me, his eyes narrowing. William Troubal doesn’t like to be put in this place.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics