Using helpless animals for the benefit of human beings goes back thousands of years. A common theme has been present: the use of these animals has been necessary for survival. Of late, these essential sacrifices have metamorphosed into yield-less speculations. Animal testing is wrong based on these premises: there are available alternatives to direct testing on live animals, the results acquired rom the tests are inaccurate and repetitive, and ultimately it is speciesism, which is comparable to racism and sexism. Today’s society has progressed in other aspects, it is time for in-obligatory animal testing to be abolished. Cruelty to animals is inexcusable, avoidable and thoroughly repelling.
In the past, humans have tested on animals because they were the best available method. In present times, the development of new procedures has changed the need to test on animals, yet it is continued in vain. Scientists have developed synthetic cells, along with the use on in vitro, which act like human cells. (Stephen Magwood, Stephen George. 1996 NERC Unit of Aquatic Biochemistry, University of Stirling). This method of using synthetic cells, which causes no pain to any living animal, has been proven to be 11% more effective than the related animal tests. The findings are more accurate in relation to human health, and therefore benefit human beings more. The use of animals in medical tests isn’t just inadequate; damage has been caused to the human lives the tests were supposed to salvage. In a recent study performed by John D Carter, Joanne Valeriano, and Frank B Vasey at the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, the use of a TNF-a antagonist that was deemed safe for human use based on animal tests proved to be harmful when a pregnant women gave birth to a child with deformities after using the drug throughout her pregnancy. The use of the drug was positively linked to the TNF-a antagonist. The drug was...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document