1. Issue Profile
The ethical question here “is it morally permissible for humans to kill animals for food.” The two positions generated are it is morally permissible to kill animals for food and that it is not morally permissible to kill animals for food. The direct stake holders in this issue are non-human animals and human-animals. The indirect stakeholders are the restaurant industry, meat-packaging industry, farmers. Some basic needs are the removal from danger for the nonhuman animals, and sustainability of resources for the human animals. All of these originate from the legitimate expectation that we both live on this world and must work together in harmony. The main basic needs at stake here are removal from danger for the nonhuman animals because when they are being killed for food they are obviously being put into harm way. Also to the fact that they need shelter because some animals have they home and environments destroyed when being hunted for food. Another basic need at stake here is the sustainability of nonrenewable resources for the human animals if animals overpopulate it could possibly add to the competition between humans for these resources by adding another competitor. A legitimate expectation in this issue is that we both the human and nonhuman animals were put on this earth together giving us the role co-inhabitants, which gives us a neighborly relationship, and from this role we have a responsibility to work together to be able to prosper and live on this earth which generates the expectation for us to live and work together peacefully.
2. Applied Ethics
The term person refers to anything that has a soul having something inside them that lets them decide and tell the difference between right and wrong and being able to use that knowledge to learn and grow as an individual. The “respect for persons” moral value as a decision making standard takes into account equality and respect for all treating all with how they should and deserve...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document