Angle of Vision: The Government vs. the Media
Imagine an American spy plane being shot down over Toronto, the governments response would be simple, a routine flight gone awry, whereas, the media would portray quite a different story of secret military operations far to sinister for the American public to handle. After researching many instances in angle of vision I have found that there are many ways to spin the same story. In these two passages about nuclear power, one by the Bush administration entitled National Energy Policy: Reliable, Affordable, and Environmentally Sound Energy for America’s Future written by an energy task force under Vice President Dick Cheney and the other written by Marianne Means entitled “Bush, Cheney Will Face Wall of Opposition If They Try To Resurrect Nuclear Power” for Hearst publishing, I find a disconnect in the facts. The angle of vision in these two papers demonstrates discrepancies between the governments’ idea of nuclear power and the medias’. I am going to compare angle of vision through overt statements of meaning, selection and omission of details, connotation of words, figures of speech and sentence emphasis.
An overt statement of meaning is a statement that emphasizes an important subject by directly stating the meaning. The selection and omission of details is when a writer includes or leaves out certain information to back up a position. Connotation of words means “the suggesting of a meaning by a word apart from the thing it explicitly names or describes” (Merriam-Webster). Figure of Speech is an expression such as a simile or metaphor. Sentence emphasis is when “details can get emphasized or de-emphasized depending on where they appear in a sentence or paragraph” (Ramage 85).
In these two articles it is clear that the Bush administration favors more nuclear plants and the media is very skeptical. In the Bush administrations article about possibly increasing the number of power plants in...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document