Anger management commonly refers to a system of therapeutic psychological techniques and exercises by which someone with excessive or uncontrollable anger can reduce or control the triggers, degrees, and effects of an emotional angered state. The term violent crime is interoperated as a crime in which an offender uses violent force or threatens the victim. This entails both crimes in which the violent act of the offender is the objective such as murder, child abuse as well as crimes where violence is the means to an end such as robbery. Anger management is somewhat used in our prisons today to enhance behaviour difficulties in violent offenders. This is not an effective way to reduce crime in society prison systems but an easier way for the prison system to convict violent offenders. This allows the offenders to get an easier, less punishable way out of the violent offence they have committed. We should be considering, when someone beats there wife, child or any other persons, they do not just do it once and then stop. This is an ongoing thing that can rarely be resolved and anger management is not a suitable option for those criminals who have committed these kinds of violent offences.
An example of who the anger management program would work on and who it wouldn’t have any effect on would be on a person who committed a sexual assault as the studies suggest that people who commit sexual assault are not violent offenders as such they have a mental disorder or haven’t been brought up right the sexual assault offender needs psychological help not anger management. Compared to a person who just assaulted someone outside of a pub/nightclub that is a crime that is caused by violence and anger management would be affective if that person wanted to change their behaviour and if they were committed to the program.
Howells 1998. Ramm and Black 2001 concluded, “This therapeutic approach is effective”. One of the common methods in recent years has been Meta-analysis, which allows for a number of outcome studies to determine whether a general pattern of effectiveness is demonstrated. “This form of treatment has a large to moderate affect in the reduction of anger problems “(Beck & Fernandez 1988). (Edmondson & conger 1996). “Although this method of treatment is affective in violent offenders changing their behavioural thoughts it’s cost effective and can only be affective on those who want to help themselves. This method of treatment surely will not cure the offender and probably doesn’t reduce the offender acting out however anger management is used as a positive message that it’s possible for behavioural changes.”
When they are referring to the words “deal with” in the essay question are referred to as they are wanting to use the anger management program to deal with the violent offenders instead of a prison sentence, but for repeat offenders and murders, child abuses, and other serious offences like that they want to have the program implemented into their sentence use it as a method of going for parole to be released early from prison. The fact that anger management only works on those who want to be helped is a sign that you’re not always going to get the results you’re aiming for. The heterogeneity of their personalities and life style characteristics the treatment options should be suited to each offender or though the most effective method used in correctional fertilities is cognitive-behavioural therapy this is the most popular and most effective. Anger and emotional training is biased on Novaco’s model of anger.
Although only a number of crimes committed are violent, United States data conducted in 1994 show that 93 per cent of state inmates and 61 per cent of federal inmates are incarcerated for a violent crime. (Wolf 1994) Similar results were recorded in Canada where 80 per cent have a violent criminal record...