Preview

Andrew Jackson: Indian Removal Policy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
447 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Andrew Jackson: Indian Removal Policy
Mrs.Rentz
Andrew Jackson
Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal policy was a terrible act. In 1830 Andrew Jackson passed a law that would change Native American lives forever .This act was the worst act removing the people that had been here way much longer than the English settlers. Andrew Jackson’s Indian removal policy was informed by his belief in nationalism and states’ rights; the policy led to corruption and the near destruction of Native Americans.
Andrew Jackson had a strong belief in nationalism and states’ rights. Jackson believed that the United States should be unified to one. Andrew Jackson quoted that” the, criticism is unfair if it distorts the role he actually played”pg (3). This means that the Indians that are criticized is injustice for the ones that actually were involved.
The Indian removal policy broke many promises to the Native Americans. The Indians were told that they did not have to leave and head south till later on when they were actually forced by threat that if they were to stay they would be killed or they had to try to change their ways to what they the settlers’ considered a common man which would never happen and eventually most tribes left. Jackson himself had tried to discourage corruption among the government agents chosen to arrange the removal, but the events as they actually transpired ran totally opposite to what he expected and promised.

Jackson’s policy nearly destroyed many Native American lives they lost everything like in the road of tears. The president had said that the Indians were correct and could stay but Jackson said u could stay but u will be killed and that ruined many lives it ruined their culture, Language and customs. Jackson quoted that if the Indians stayed they would “disappear and be forgotten.” Pg (5). This means that if they stayed they would have all been killed.
Native Americans were forced to move out by the policy of the Indian removal act. Jackson’s policy had led to the nationalism and states

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Jackson's reasons for the Indian Removal is that they were in the way of the white people's expansion and that most were starting to break the laws of the land. The Indians should not be removed because it was their land first and it is inhumane.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act. According to a page about Andrew Jackson Administration in the Zinn Education Project Cherokee/Seminole Removal Role Play,the Indian Removal Act was a law passed by Jackson forcing Natives to leave their land and move to Oklahoma. The purpose of this law was to get farmers more…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jackson believed whites were more superior than Native Americans. He also believed that Indians were unable to handle their own personal and financial affairs. For this reason, Jackson was firmly against Indian sovereignty.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ronal Takaki opens our eyes to a different view of one of our early presidents. Andrew Jackson was for removing the Indians, “He supported the efforts of Mississippi and Georgia to abolish Indian tribal units and allow white settlers to take cultivated Indian lands” (Takaki, 2008. Pg. 81). He believed that the deaths of Indians meant that America was advancing civilization. Andrew did not feel guilty about what he stood for. Although they were laws that protected the Indians and their land, he did not obey them. Instead, he would ignore them, “Supreme Court ruled that…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John L. O’Sullivan had said, “‘... our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions.’” (www.britanica.com) During Andrew Jackson’s term, America had set its sights on the untamed West - which, inconveniently, happened to be the Indians’ territory. President Jackson decided to create a controversial treaty that would allow America to exchange the Indians’ land for a large piece of land in the Louisiana Territory. It was created on May 28, 1830 and sparked much criticism and support throughout the nation. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was justified because the Indians were enemies of America, they were given good land, and they were offered the government’s protection.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Known as having adopted an Indian child as his son, Andrew Jackson was quite fond of the Indian race; however, with pressure to expand westward, he needed to transfer the Indians farther west and soon became their worst enemy. Andrew Jackson’s Indian Policy was to move the Indians westward as peacefully as possible, for the tribes that stayed in the East Coast were annihilated. Also, moving them West will help them live longer, and there is a fair exchange for the tribes moving. Another important component is the gain of Western lands and the addition of American power; this will add on to America’s size and increase America’s authority.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While President Andrew Jackson is often made out to be a villain for his treatment of the Native Americans, he is not to blame for the massive loss of life the tribes experienced. Most of the non-natives in the South, especially Georgia, supported the Indian Removal Act, shaping the South’s political views and putting pressure on Congress, the Senate, and Jackson himself. Eager to take on Native American lands, appetites were large for the Native Americans to be removed.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1838 and 1839 Andrew Jackson from Tennessee was forceful on Indian Removal, and from 1814 to 1824 jackson was instrumental in negotiating nine out of 11 treaties, which had devastated the southern tribes of their eastern lands in the west. So the Cherokee indians were tired of it so they went to the supreme court. The n in 1830 Jackson pushed a whole new piece of legislation called the “Indian Removal Act”. Jackson’s attitude towards the Native Americans came off as rude because he did not like the Indians and he wanted them gone.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Age of Jackson Dbq

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, dictating that all Indians living in the Deep South had to move to Eastern Oklahoma, because the Indians had something everyone else wanted, land. Jackson says in his First Inaugural Address,“It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy, and to give that humane and considerate attention to their rights and their wants which is consistent with the habits of our Government and the feelings of our people.” Jackson is saying that It will be his genuine and continuous desire towards the Indian tribes, and we want to give them a fair and open policy, and give humane and kind attention to their rights and their wants which is the same with the habits of our government and the feelings of our people. He wants to give the Indian tribes a good policy. Later on, he removes the Indian tribes from their homes in the Deep South and makes them march on the trail of tears, where they relocate to Eastern Oklahoma.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    More and more Native American tribes were forced to leave. The Choctaws, Cherokees, Creeks, Seminoles,Chickasaws and more were forced to…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Removal Act DBQ

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Since the colonization of America, there have been tensions and confrontations between white settlers and Native Americans over territory and civilization. President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, allowing him to communicate with Native American tribal leaders in order to negotiate their voluntary relocation to Federal reservations west of the Mississippi River. When several tribes refused to relocate, the conflict turned violent and was conducted through the use of militias and military force. Due to this violent conflict and the subsequent relocation of hundreds of thousands of Native Americans, relations between Native Americans and the United States Government have since been strained. Native Americans continually experience higher rates of poverty, fewer opportunities for educational advancement, higher rates of physical and mental illness, as well as general discrimination through social systems and policy. Strained relationships, societal, and economic opportunities have weakened and are less readily available to Native Americans, all factors that can be traced back to the Indian Removal Act.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As more and more people migrated to the United States, the government felt that settlers needed more space in the US Territory. They had already forced several Native American tribes off of “US land” by the time Andrew Jackson was President. In the Southwestern United States, the Creek, Cherokee, Choctaw, and Chickasaw tribes excelled in interacting with new settlers. Jackson had been able to maintain a peaceful relationship with these tribes and had even raised a Creek orphan alongside his own son. Although he did not treat them as if they were strangers, he still saw them as inferior. He forced the tribes to split and absorb into the American way of life. At the beginning of his presidency, the Cherokee’s tribal and state governments began…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    They did not protest or object the cruel things that Andrew Jackson was doing. Some of the cruel things being; treating Indians poorly, destroying the bank, and threatening to kill his vice president. The main reason for their carelessness was that they in fact wanted the Indians to leave. The main reasons for them wanting the Indians to leave was more shelter, more land, and more job opportunities. As they were kicking the Natives out of their homes, just moments later new, white, Americans moved right in as the Native families watch another family move into their house (Corby). Today, we can prove that the public promptly did not care about the Natives because they kept their president, Andrew Jackson, in office as the acts were being passed. In the Election of 1832, Jackson won by a landslide with 219 electoral votes. The second place loser, Henry Clay, received only 49 electoral votes (1832 Presidential Election). Obviously, if anyone wanted to change what was going on, Andrew Jackson would not have stayed in…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Andrew Jackson was greatly amiss in his measure to force the Indians out of their homes were their ancestors had lived in long ago. Thus because, he used brutal force and harsh conditions before and during the removal of the Indian tribes. “Men paid to move the Cherokee Nation are cruel”(Cherokee). This segment was published on April 4, 1838 along with other various articles, and explains that the Cherokee new that the government would not treat them with respect nor kindness. While disliked by the vast majority of Indians, most of the everyday people actually admired Jackson because they saw him as somewhat of a hero because he gave the perception that the Indians were uncivilized savages, and by removing them he…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jacksonian Democrats

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A major dilemma for Jackson was what to do with Native Americans living in the South and on this issue Jackson failed at protecting the rights of Native Americans. As shown in the picture, Native Americans living in the South were driven away from their lands to Oklahoma on a path known as the Trail of Tears. Did the Native Americans not have the same rights as the whites living in the South? Apparently Jackson and his successor Martin Van Buren did not ever consider this question and upon this they failed to protect the Constitution. In relation to the issue of Indian removal came another violation of the Constitution by Andrew Jackson. When John Marshall and the Supreme Court ruled that Georgia's extension of state law over Cherokee land was unconstitutional, Andrew Jackson totally ignored the decision. This action violated Supreme Court decisions and strengthened Jackson's reputation as an enemy of the law.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays