In this assignment I am to review the case study of Andrea Yates. I am to write a 1 to 2 page summary of the case and answer/discuss the questions below. (1)
What is the legal issue in the case study? What is the ethical issue? (2)
Describe the differences between civil commitment and criminal commitment. What are some examples of each from the case study? (3)
Discuss the terms insanity defense and competency to stand trial in relation to the case you choose. (4)
When is information confidential? When is the therapist involved in duty to warn? How does or could duty to warn relate to the case you chose to review? (5)
If you encountered the type of individual in the case study on the job (previous to the person committing a crime), what would you do to help the individual, but not cross legal and ethical boundaries? Explain your answer.
Legal and Ethical Case Study
On June 20, 2001 36 year Andrea Yates from Clear Lake, Texas and a mother of five young children Noah 7, John 5, Paul 4, Luke 2 and Mary months old. Andrea drowned her children in the family bathtub then called 911 and her husband. Andrea’s comment to her husband was really unbelievable she said “you need to come home, it’s time, I did it” (Yates, 2001). Rusty her husband didn’t know what she was talking about and asked her what she did her reply was “it’s the children” and asked “which one” (Yates, 2011), Andrea replies “all of them” (Yates, 2011). Andrea had laid four of the children on a double bed in the Master Bedroom and covered them with a blanket, when detectives looked their eyes were wide open, the fifth child was left in the bathtub with that had amid feces and vomit floating to the surface in plain sight.
When the police finally arrived at the Yates’s residence Andrea lead the officer’s into her home and she told them in detail what she had done to her children without any emotion or remorse. Andrea told the officers that she was a bad mother and that she needed to...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document