The Han Empire was very interested in advancing technology and systems as much as possible. They were always looking for improvement, such as the letter a Han government official sent to other officials about improving the irrigation systems and flood prevention systems. (Doc.1) Water was a very important element to the Han Empire as it helped shape their new inventions and new takes on already established technologies. (Doc.3,4,8) The Han Empire had governmental as well as high ranking philosophical backing in their drive to advance their technology. A document that would help reinforce this analysis would be a letter from a government official asking other officials from around the world about any advances they would be willing to share. The Romans did not view technology as a tool, but a hindrance. High ranking officials and wealthy gentlemen viewed any kind of job that required the use of technology or tools was degrading and vulgar. They thought that there was nothing noble or gentlemanly about the work of the lower classes. (Doc.5,7) This shows Rome’s attitude towards technology is very negative and it is not a common interest among other Romans. Despite the fact that Rome did use technology, it was not a very high priority in Roman society. A document that could help support my claim would be a list of technological advancements over the course of many years showing how little new technology has shown up in everyday life. While both Empires had different attitudes toward the advancement of technology, they each accepted technological changes throughout history. Whether it be the new system of roads that Rome integrated (Doc.6) or the change in quality of tools in the Han Empire (Doc.2). They each had technological changes happen and both Empires accepted them even though the attitudes toward them were much different. The Han Empire embraced the changes and invention of new technology while the Roman Empire resented technological change.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The Han dynasty and Roman Empire demonstrated many different attitudes and reaction as new technological advancements emerged and diffused thought the empire. The romans sought out that tradition was necessary to incorporate and implement into their works, which involved much more workload. On the other hand the Han accepted of most new advancements, as it benefited and contributed toward their social and economic status, that develop rapidly…
- 439 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Hans and the Romans both had very fascinating views on their technology. While The Han’s attitude toward technology was viewed as a positive contribution to their society the Romans had positive views other Romans had negative attitudes. Every document has its own opinions on the way they appreciate technology some support which is making then look good, while some think it’s for low class people and not for government. In order to fully analyze Han and Roman attitudes toward technology it would have been helpful to have an additional document of an interview with a Roman laborer because all of the other documents were from higher class Romans who did not work with tools and such technology.…
- 554 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Han China (206 B.C.E.- 220 C.E.) and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. - 476 C.E.) were each amazing civilizations in their own ways. Each dynasty made many great ecological and technological advancements. Additionally, the governments of these civilizations each had ways of maintaining the political control over their subjects. The Han Dynasty of China and Imperial Rome’s methods of political control were similar in many ways (including their use of centralized governments and their uses of their military) and many differences (including the roles of citizens in the government and the governments techniques for keeping the lower classes happy) but I believe the similarities outweigh the differences because while the differences are definite ways to control the people, the similarities listed have been much more long-lasting and are also much more essential to this type of control.…
- 775 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Imperial Han and Imperial Rome were two very important empires in Europe and Asia. Even though their time in ruling was different they both were very powerful in their time. The Imperial Rules of Rome and Han China had differences and similarities in the techniques of imperial administration such as different ways of religion, Confucianism and Christianity, similar social aspects because of patriarchy as well as economic similarities such as trade in the Silk Road.…
- 585 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Rome and China were somewhat different in religion, but were very different in technology. China was based on production and Rome was based on architecture and building. While Rome was creating arches and inventing concrete, China was creating a watermill and inventing paper and the seismometer. Both were unique in these ways but agreed that roads were very important. Roads connected empires across the hemisphere and allowed quick transportation for armies. Neither Rome nor China could ignore building roads because they are the key to expanding an empire.…
- 517 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
After reviewing these documents it is clear that the Roman’s and Han’s attitudes towards technology differed from person to person. For the most part, Romans disapproved of new tools that were being invented, unimpressed by hammers and tongs, they thought tools were useless and made people indolent. On the other hand, most Hans thought technology was a wonderful thing, making peoples lives easier and completing tasks faster. To better understand the Roman and Han impression on technology, one must understand their opinions and situations regarding the use of new tools and other technological advances.…
- 320 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Technology in the Han and Roman empires had come a long way since earlier times. However, some of the people of these great states seemed to take this for granted. At least that was the attitude I got from three of the documents provided. But, mostly the attitude was positive. From the perspective of these government officials and philosophers, I perceived an attitude that ranged from very positive to openly negative.…
- 646 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Now in the Roman Empire, the advancements made were not water or agricultural related, they were advancements in tools and crafts. Cicero, an upper-class political leader, believed that the invention of tools had a great impact on the dignity of men. In Rome, men were held to a certain degree of gentlemen…
- 855 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
After studying the provided documents (#1-8) its come to my understanding that both the Han and Roman empires thought of technology as useful and somewhat revolutionary, but both of them had somewhat different feelings of it. The Han dynasties attitude toward technology was that they thought it was very benefical, and they admired it. The reason this was because they though it to be very helpful in agriculture and construction purposes. Evidence of the positive effects of this can be seen in Document 4: History of the Early Han Dynasty which tells of a governer of Nanynay and as the very generous and loving person he was his policies also refelcted his personality. He had so much love for his people he wanted to lift weight of their shoulders and make their lives a little easier by inventing a water-powered blowing-engine which was enjoyed by eveyone adopted and spread his invention. The Roman empire however were not as positive about technology as the Hans. Even though they appreciated it to some extent the main viewpoint from the documents suggested that they thought of it was a bit demeaning also. Evidence can be found in Document 7, written by an upper-class Roman philospher and adviser which was saying that he did not believe that tools were created by "wise men" meaning a very developed mind, or someone who was thinking outside the box. He believe like the hammer for instance was created by a simple minded human, though its a very popular tool it was not advanced a tool as it could've been.…
- 903 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han Dynasty and The Roman Empire both were able to expand and develop their empires with their distinctive governing methods and control. To China, the centerpiece that supervised everything was knows as Confucianism. With all dependability focused on the emperor and society serving as a family unit, Han China's political system was known for a centralized, closed unit. It was ruled by an emperor who greatly observed the Mandate of Heaven. The Han developed a supply of soldiers, which kept their borders secured and made them capable to exchange with others from time to time. On the other hand, Rome had a centralized, blended structure. The main focus points of the Roman Society were operated by a Roman Republic, which was more like a monarchy, who controlled their complex structure. The Roman Society had more residents and rights than the Hans, Roman's political control lay in the hands of the wealthy, which then they were elected to a political seat. The governors were picked from family networks. The only way Romans could accomplish anything big in a certain time span was to make strong changes in their community. It was an enormous weight on Rome's resources and power, when they had to stress over big wins. For example, when there was barely any food to support the developing empire. The Romans and the Hans both had their wealthiest people control over their peasants, which caused a social distribution to each and every one, and could have leaded to outbreaks in little battles, wars between the communities, and what not. This was entirely not beneficial on each empire's part and especially their social interaction.…
- 808 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Han Guan (document 2) a government official is describing the bad conditions of technology due to the quantity of the workers and the quality of labor. He also says that the lack of using technology causes an increase in the iron and salt prices, causing the lack of seasoning for other countries and the insufficiency of strong tools for farming, building, etc. As Seneca , a Roman philosopher said that "I do not believe that tools for the crafts were invented by wise men. The question of whether the hammer or the tongs came first does not seem important to me. Both were invented by someone with a mind that was nimble and sharp, but not great or elevated" and Cicero (document 5), an upper class roman political said "Vulgar and unbecoming to a gentleman are all the jobs hired workers take on, whose labor is purchased rather than their skill. All craftsmen spend their time in vulgar occupations; no workshop can have anything enlightening about it." This clearly show that these two Roman upper class man were against technology because they believed that inventors and craftsmen have a lack of wisdom and enlightenment. Lastly, Document 6 shows Plutarch, a high government official, writing about how Gaius Gracchus created roads that helped the mobility of horses without requiring a groom to help.…
- 504 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Han Dynasty attitude towards technology is positive and negative feelings towards society even though Rome expressed the same feelings. These 8 documents can help prove and provide evidence for my thesis. In (doc 1) and (doc 4) explain how the Han Dynasty used water for positive things. In (doc 2) and (doc 3) explain the negative perceptions, which are how tools of the first century B.C.E were good enough to use but were neutrally valued, but overtime the quality of the item decreased.…
- 707 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
History has seen its fair share of technological innovations that were significant and impactful to the people and society of that time period. These advancements in technology brought about monumental changes, for good and for worse. An example of a noteworthy innovation was Johann Gutenberg’s printing press. During the Renaissance, the printing press played a key role in the spreading of new ideas. The use of roads was a technological innovation as well. During the reign of the Roman Empire, roads impacted humankind in multiple aspects of life, such as trade and transportation. After the study of the printing press during the Renaissance, and roads of the Roman Empire, one could make an argument that each was a significant technological innovation and had effects on their respective time periods.…
- 608 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Technology is the building block of any society: it allows for new advancements to be made that improve daily life. Two such societies that made advancements in technology included the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire. As the expansion of the empire increased, the Romans built roads that linked these regions together. These roads were built in such a way that allowed for easier travel: roads were paved and allowed for water to run off. In addition, the empire also developed the transportation of water throughout the city through the construction of aqueducts, which were canals. Likewise, the Han Dynasty made advancements in the distribution of water: there were water ways, canals, and pools that were inspected by hydraulic engineers. Water was also used to power a blowing-engine. Because of the advancements that were made, the Han Dynasty is regarded by historians as the “Golden Age.” Similarly, the Romans created a large empire that stretched from Europe to the Middle East. Because of the vastness of both empires, water and technology were heavily relied upon, yet unlike the Han officials, the upper-class Romans had a negative attitude towards technology.…
- 1236 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The Roman and the Han were by far the most technologically advanced civilizations of their time. The time period for both of the societies depicted whether or not the people were inclined to their advancements or not. Much evidence goes to show that both the Roman and Han societies attitudes towards technology in B.C.E. were more negative and in C.E. they leaned more positive. In the documents given, it is evident that during the B.C.E. both the Roman and Han’s attitude toward their technologies were negative. Little did they know how helpful they would turn out to be and how they would revolutionize the world forever. This is first apparent from an excerpt from a Han government official. He states that they need more water conservation offices that are staffed with people who are experienced to aid the local community with the floods (doc. 1). This exemplifies that the people were dissatisfied with the lack of officials to keep the community organized and free of danger. This negative theme is also seen in a passage written by a Han government official (Han Guan) who is complaining about the iron tools and how they were made better when they were made individually by the common people rather than mass-produced by the state. He also touches on the fact that salt and iron prices have sky rocketed so the common people could not afford to season their food and make tools for themselves…
- 1174 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays