Preview

Analyzing Aristotle

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
331 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyzing Aristotle
Analyzing Aristotle

1) The soul and the body are different forms. While the body is visible and mortal, the soul is invisible and immortal. He suggests that although the body dies and decays, the soul continues to exist. I do believe there is life after death, everyone must eventually die, and it cannot be avoided. However, even though death is a fact of life, it is a topic that many people prefer not to talk about. This avoidance of discussion is usually due to the denial of one’s own death and the denial is usually due to fear. The fear is, for many people, a fear of the unknown. In my opinion i believe that when humans die, the body and the brain dies, but the mind still exists and it creates our afterlife according to our own beliefs and expectations. If a person believes there in nothing after death then there will not be a dream, it will be as if the person is asleep forever without dreaming.

2) Yes, I agree that the universe is purposeful. The purpose of the creation, every though you have is creating your tomorrow. The universe has mysterious ways of revolving what we do day by day.
For example Karma: The sum of a person's actions in this and previous states of existence, viewed as deciding their fate in life.

3- Aristotle said: “Yet there is God, though not perhaps the simple and human god conceived by the forgivable anthropomorphism of the adolescent mind."

Aristotle represents God as self-conscious spirit. A rather mysterious spirit; for Aristotle God's never does anything; he has no desires, no will, no purpose; he is activity so pure that he never acts. He is absolutely perfect; therefore cannot desire anything; therefore He does nothing. His only occupation is to contemplate the essence of things; and since He himself is the essence of all things, the form of all forms, his sole employment is the contemplation of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is your belief about human nature and the afterlife? Human nature is composing of bodies and soul. If you believe in afterlife, then your soul will leave the body and continue on to…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Chapter 8, Empowering Aristotle, Flyvbjerg uses his views and the diverse perspectives of philosophers to broaden our understanding of “power”. We are encouraged to view power as an omnipresent dynamic entity that is a process, a support, and a strategy, among other things. As we work to connect these ideas to our current work or research interests, please discuss which ideas you relate to most or which ideas you identify with least. How could these ideas impact your current or future…

    • 83 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karma – in Hinduism, all the deeds of a person’s life that affect existence in the next life.…

    • 4836 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The meditator disagrees with the argument that he could believe in a God due to being in denial, and creating the idea in contrast with his own imperfect self. Our own self-doubts, as well as our wishes derive from the idea that we are not adequate and there exists a perfect pious being. "In this first instance of knowledge, there is nothing but a clear and distinct perception of what I affirm. Yet this would hardly be enough to render me certain of the truth of a thing, if it could ever happen that something that I perceived so clearly and distinctly were false. And thus I now seem to be able to posit as a general that everything I clearly and distinctly perceive is true." The meditator also alludes to the idea that he could possibly be on the brink of perfection, and his remaining flaws are slowly vanishing, and he is growing more and more immaculate. However, if he is capable of being perfect, then he is capable of conceiving the idea of God without outside influence. "I am certain that I am a thinking thing. But do I not therefore also know what is required for me to be certain of anything?" (70)The…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Presumably, the poem “Aristotle” is an adaptation to Aristotle's conceptions on tragedies, in which a tragedy must contain a beginning, middle, and end. Throughout the poem there are unequivocal transitions telling the audience the when the beginning, middle, and end have arrived. Furthermore, the tile may also allude to the way the poem will be written. Since Aristotle was a well renowned philosopher, the poem may contain reflections upon certain actions, that lead to misfortunes found in tragedies. However, I also find the poem’s title, although being appropriate for the piece, to be partially ironic. This is due to the concept that poetry has no determined ending whereas, according to Aristotle, tragedies do have closure for the audience.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle sets up as his faculty for knowledge both the active and the passive intellects. We begin to have knowledge through sense experience. We cannot know without sense experienceand it is from sense experience that all knowledge is therefore generated. Knowledge for Aristotle is a knowledge of universals, that is, a knowledge of Essences. Thought is thus the faculty by…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this essay I will be explaining, contradicting and supporting many points which are raised with the question of ‘what happens after death?’ I will begin to recognize the possibilities and impossibilities of religious, scientific and even my own differentiating perhaps controversial opinion. In the course of this writing, my views on afterlife, death and whether or not a soul exists will change and be influenced by the theories of others. From what we have discovered and learnt in philosophy lessons I have developed the idea that thoughts of this question fit into three main categories which are:…

    • 3203 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotele V Sartre

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Does human nature really exist? Is there such thing as life purpose? And how is happiness achieved? These are some of the question that has been puzzling philosophers since the beginning of time.…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the “Proslogion” Anselm argues God as the greatest conceivable being that exists in reality. In this essay, I will show that Anselm’s ontological argument is sound and his conclusion logically follows from his premises. I will consider an objection towards Anselm’s definition of God and show that it is unconvincing and flawed. The objection against Anselm’s ontological argument that I will consider will be one brought up by a contemporary of Anselm, Gauinilo.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle Research Paper

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aristotle is one of the most well known philosophers in history. He was born in 384 BC in Stagira, which is in Macedonia. His father was personal physician to the king of Macedonia at that time, Amyntas. He lived until 322 BC when he died at a family estate in Euboea. Aristotle is credited with many great accomplishments during his time. He was pupil to a great mind, as well as a teacher to great leaders. Aristotle's thinking was beyond his time and rivaled the worldview at the time.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This begins ultimately with the writers' theory that "energy never just springs into existence or ceases to exist; it simply changes form" (Williams, 2002). It is important during this period to find out why the writer truly believes that the mind can live on after death. The article recommends that the mind of a deceased person could eventually transform to the point where we could no longer say the original mind still exists. However, although "the mind was a form of physical energy, the principle would not guarantee survival." (Williams, 2002).…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Natural Law Weaknesses

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    | Purpose - The idea of ‘purpose’ in nature can be explained by science (evolution and natural selection).…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    (1) The essence of God is to be a perfect being. (That is, I cannot conceive of God as not being a perfect being.)…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle's Argument

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page

    What is a good argument? Aristotle’s was the first person to have a formal theory for argument. He states that an argument is “When, certain things being so, something else results from these by their being so (either generally or for the most part) – there (in the Topics) this is called deduction, here it is called enthymeme” (Rhetoric I.2, 1356b16–18). It’s very interesting how Aristotle’s saw an argument from very different ways. In my opinion an argument is just the view of things from different perspective. I can’t understand how he can relate many words and concepts to this simple word. As Dr. King ask in lecture, what is a good argument? Is the big question. He combined fallacies, validity and induction to create a good…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Strayer Ch 5 Key Terms

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Indian belief, the force generated by one's behavior in a previous life that decides the level at which an individual will be reborn.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays