Ever since its creation at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, the Electoral College has been the most widely debated aspect in the Constitution. There have been over 700 proposed constitutional amendments aimed at fixing or abolishing this process. And Congress has on several occasions held highly publicized hearings on Electoral College reform but overall has remained fairly inactive (Best, p. vii). And while the Electoral College is a cornerstone of our Constitution and therefore a major aspect of American democracy and government, its very nature is quite unfair and undemocratic. Many of its aspects portray biases and favor certain groups of people and certain states. It is deemed archaic, undemocratic, complex, ambiguous, indirect, and dangerous by many scholars and is in direct need of reforming (Kura, p. 30). It especially contradicts Walter Stone’s instrumental voting model for the Electoral College at first makes one believe as if one’s vote counts but eventually one figures out that it is in fact quite unimportant (Stone, p. 51). For with the Electoral College, the people are not in charge but rather the system is – the Electoral College presidential election system that is.…
In what are perhaps the most volatile of dinnertime conversation topics, politics and elections take to the forefront of our daily lives in major fashion once every four years. This is of course when many Americans head to the polls to cast their votes for who they want to see in the oval office. Months, in fact almost a year, of campaigning culminates on that Tuesday evening in November as the fate of a nation is decided. However few people fully understand just how that election process works. We have all heard of the electoral college but few of us fully understand it or its impact on our democratic process. This election process divides our nation into two parties and directly impacts everything from campaigning to voter turnout and can even affect the outcome of the election altogether.…
Compared with citizens of other nations, Americans vote at lower rates, but more frequently and for many more offices. For these reasons, elections make a bigger difference in the…
The way a winner is found in most every level of professionalism (high school government elections, mayoral elections, even governor elections) is by counting the votes and the candidate with the most, wins. However, the Electoral College, the method in which we choose the most important position, President, is an indirect way of voting. This means that when Americans go to the poll every 4 years to vote for our President, their direct votes is not what determines the outcome.…
One of the biggest advantages of the Electoral College is the firm political stability it provides the nation by encouraging the two-party system. (Kimberling, n.d.) Without the two-party system, votes would be splintered among many candidates and would result in constant recounts and mass confusion. In this way, the system is very transparent and greatly aids in reaching a majority. The College also contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president. Therefore, it is impossible for one region to hold the absolute majority of required electoral votes. Without this mechanism in place, it is possible that the president would be selected either through the denomination of one populous region over the others, or through the denomination of large metropolitan areas over the rural ones. (Kimberling, n.d.) Another great advantage offered by the College is the enhancement of the status of minority groups. This makes it possible for voters of small minorities, be they ethnic minorities or labor unions, in any given state to make the difference between winning all or none of a state’s electoral votes. (Kimberling, n.d.) Finally, it encourages candidates to view the country as a whole and can offer the framework for establishing and organizing campaigns. (apecsec.org,…
Therefore how good of a method is the Electoral College if it goes against basic democratic principles by making the vote of one citizen worth more than the vote of another, depending on the population of the state in which they reside. Moreover another major criticism of the Electoral College is the Winner Takes All system. This simply means a candidate can win the popular vote, but end up losing the election. This again challenges the democratic stance of American politics, as a candidate can be favoured amongst the majority of the population, yet lose the election because of the way in which states are represented within the Electoral College system. This undemocratic mishap has occurred in the past within the 1876, 1888…
The 2000 United States (U.S.) presidential election concluded with Vice President Al Gore winning half a million more popular votes than George W. Bush (50,992,335 to 50,455,156) yet losing the White House in the Electoral College by only five votes (271 to 266). It once again raised questions about the validity of the Electoral College as the same scenario has occurred in the 1824, 1876, and 1888 presidential elections. This essay will discuss two problems of the Electoral College: the failure to accurately reflect national popular vote will and the problem of state bias. I argue that the U.S. should abolish the Electoral College and implementthe direct popular election of the president.…
Every four years the United States enters the frenzy of election. Presidential candidates from multiple parties get ready for a campaign across the nation to gain popular support from both the delegates and the people. The presidential candidate not only has to win the popular vote, but also the majority votes in the Electoral College. The Electoral College serves to elect the president and the vice president of the United States. It is a form of indirect election which is opposed by many. Those who oppose the system fear that the Electoral College will allow the possibility of a minority president or a faithless elector, while people who argue in favor of the electoral system believe that Although the Electoral College is archaic and flawed, it is still currently the most sufficient form of election for the President; though changes may be made, it is unlikely that the entire system can be replaced.…
The American Government and Public Affairs are divided into two house principle that compose of elements which are directly, elected by the people of the United State in high frequency, which were select the state in low frequency. According to the article noted, the limited executive with all the jobs of a king which have few powers of one’s independent, judiciary appointed for life on good behavior these rights are explicitly in which protect the simplicity of the government power which was been denied.…
Contrary to popular belief, America’s presidents are not elected by direct democratic vote of the people. Rather, the United States Constitution says that they are elected by the Electoral College.…
(Hoxie p. 717), what it is in fact is the product of a 200 year old debate over…
The American Presidency is a puzzling aspect to most Americans. There is a lot of debate about the system's strengths and weaknesses. I would like to offer a broad concept of the American constitutional system, which are the executive, legislative and judicial branches. To begin to grasp the constitutional system, I would like to discuss why the forefathers composed it this way. The forefathers chose a mixed government that represented three existing forms of government: a monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy. The president would represent the elected monarchy, the Senate would represent the aristocracy, and the House of Representatives would represent the democracy. The American presidency has a great deal of strength and weakness, which I will discuss in this paper.…
Selecting the president of a country is probably one of the most prominent things a citizen of a country should care about. One person, the president, can simply ruin his country or make it better than it has ever been, all during the time of his presidency. So, the process of selecting a president has been put into careful consideration and the government has run the election of the presidency in an “Electoral College” form. Meaning, certain “electors” are appointed to give their votes for a candidate instead of actually making the popular vote of the citizens count. Some may oppose to it, while others want it to stay as how it is. This topic of the electoral college creates controversial discussions because there benefits and non benefits that can apply to the democratic and republican parties.…
Democracy is a system of government that gives power to the people, whether directly or through elected representatives. The United States’s system is a democracy where the people’s votes, opinion, and action make a difference. Every four years we hold an election to select who will be our succeeding president. When our country was being developed we had a group of white, well-educated, and most part wealthy males who were known as the Framers. The Framers of the United States created a system called the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a group of representatives of each state who cast the final ballots that actually elect the president.…
The Electoral College In the United States, we the people are guaranteed a vote in our government. Built upon the principles of freedom and democracy, The United States has striven to give equal representation to the people. Presidential elections are held to give people the chance to vote for who they believe will best serve the country. The electoral college is in place and adds an extra step in the presidential election process.…