Analogies are used to help people understand a concept by giving a comparison of the concept that they would understand. For example if you had to describe strawberry ice cream to someone who has never tasted it before you could use an analogy, to describe the flavour of the ice cream you could say it tastes like vanilla ice cream strawberries. This then give the person a comparison of the unfamiliar concept so the person could understand it better. The ain philosopher of the theory of analogies was Thomas Aquinas. He believed that language could not be used literally when speaking about Go He belied that when you speak about Gods then you should be speaking analogically. For example if someone said God is good then Aquinas believed that the statement would be a simpler comparison of God actual characteristics, so that human kind could understand God. Aquinas believed analogies could be used in two different ways, these where, the analogy of attribution and the analogy of proportion.
The analogy of Attribution where word such as good and just can be applied to both God and human beings. This works saying a person is not just themselves but has the qualities of being just. Brain Davies used the following example to describe the analogy of attribution. He said that you can say that a baker is good and the bread the baker makes is good. The word good is used to describe both the baker and the bread; however they do not mean the same thing. When you say the bread is good, you are commenting on the taste and texture of the bread, where as when you describe the beer as good you are not commenting on his taste and texture but the qualities and skills he processes to be a good baker and therefore it is those skill that makes the bread good. This brings me on to Aquinas next stage of the theory. He believed that God created the world therefore he is revelled through it, allowing human being to be able to make comparison to hi because he is shown trough the world around...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document