The death penalty is one of the controversial topics being widely discussed today. Anna Quindlen is one of many people who opposes the death penalty. She is a crime buff who has worked as a reporter for decades in some of the worst areas of New York. In her article, "Death Penalty's False Promise: An Eye for an Eye," she states how the death penalty and her have nothing in common. She claims that the killing of one human being as punishment for the killing of another makes no sense and is inherently immoral. She tries to relate to her readers by using imagery, stating her opinions, and by appealing to the emotions of her readers. Throughout her argument, she also uses many examples to back up her opinions. She gives examples of situations that appeal to her readers sentiments and makes them feel connected to the scenario. Quindlen not only relates to the readers who oppose the death penalty, but she also relates to the readers who thinks it is a valid means of dealing with criminals. Throughout the article, Quindlen targets both views of the death penalty; stating what the beneficial factors of each side of the death penalty are. She starts off her article talking about Ted Bundy and how he's murdered dozens of women. "He and the death penalty seemed made for each other." In an indirect way, she is agreeing to the death penalty and thinks that Ted Bundy should recieve the death penalty. Then she goes right back to saying "The deah penalty and I, on the other hand, seem to have nothing in common," stating her claim that she opposes the death penalty. This technique Quindlen uses captures all of her readers; it allows the readers to feel that she is not trying to impose her opinions on her readers but rather, relate to them.
One of the techniques that Quindlen uses is appealing to her audience's emotions. She relates to her readers by connecting with the audience of both sides of the argument. "I have always been governed by my gut, and my gut says i am...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document