Preview

An Explanation of the New York Budget Passed with the Help of Governor Andrew Cuomo

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
405 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
An Explanation of the New York Budget Passed with the Help of Governor Andrew Cuomo
Hwan Cho 4/3/12

Cuomo, Admitting Setbacks, Says He Asked for the Moon
In this article Cuomo, Admitting Setbacks, Says He Asked for the Moon by Danny Hakim, John Eligon, and Thomas Kaplan explains the New York budget which was passed with the help of Governor Andrew Cuomo. It starts off with how last year rookie Gov. Cuomo accomplished a great deal by taming the legislatures up in Albany and passed against all odds the same sex marriage bill. However this year it was a totally different story. One of his promises during his campaign was that he wouldn’t allow gerrymandering district, however he had to succumb to that in order for the budget bill to pass. Critics are saying that gerrymandering protects the incumbents and are unfair to black and Latinos. Also by signing this, it will be in effect until 2020. However out of this he did manage to achieve a pension change with the minimum age now starting at 63 and a lower payout. The governor was also able to manage to start the process for another amendment that would allow as many as seven casinos to start in the state.
This article is important because it shows us Cuomo making an attempt to get the budget out on time. We see that Cuomo has also come back to reality with the fact that unlike last year where he seemed to control the legislature and even got the same sex marriage bill out of the state senate, he has had to give concessions and caved into promises he has made. The article shows us how politics work up in Albany with many times deals being struck the last minute and three men really having all the power the governor, Assembly speaker, and Senate Majority Leader.
This article is also related to class. We have learned in class about the governor and the legislature. We see here that all three of these men coming together and how much influence they really have with the Governor the leader of the state, Speaker in charge of the NYS Assembly, and Majority Leader in charge of the NYS Senate.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering is currently legal as there aren’t any laws that prohibit its use. However, some courts have ruled some gerrymandering cases as unconstitutional. It is believed that Gill v. Whitford case could bring about new regulations to the Gerrymandering.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thus gerrymandering isn't unconstitutional. People can draw the districts however large or small that they want, there is no specification of what is lawful and what is not in the constitution There isn’t even a section or article in the entire constitution where it talks about redrawing districts. To be more specific there are no provisions (a condition or requirement in a legal document) outlined in the Constitution forbidding gerrymandering. Republicans held a majority in both houses of the state legislature, and a Republican was governor so of course they are going to draw districts into their favor; who wouldn’t? Furthermore there are little to no supreme court cases where gerrymandering was found unconstitutional. So if it is not unconstitutional or even in the constitution how can it be justiciable? The job of the supreme court is to uphold the constitution so if its constitutional it shouldn't be in the supreme…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main purpose of gerrymandering is to increase the number of legislative seats that can be won by the political party which is in charge of redrawing the district boundaries during that period of time, and to create “safe” seats for the party’s incumbent legislators which are seats in which the incumbent will always win re-election. Gerrymandering is the redrawing of election district boundaries to give an electoral advantage to a particular candidate or party. It has been recognized as a part of the American political landscape since 1812. The term derives from a redrawing of US Representative districts in Massachusetts before the 1812 elections, when Elbridge Gerry was governor. People said the district was reminiscent of a salamander and thus the term Gerry-mander was coined. The Constitution requires that representation in the House of Representatives be apportioned to states on the basis of population. So, every ten years we count up the number of people living in each state and making sure that each state gets at least one House member, divide up the rest of the seats among the states equally. States with large populations get a bigger amount of house seats smaller states get just the one. A variety of Supreme Court cases, however, have applied the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause to the process of drawing legislative districts resulting in a requirement that each district have roughly the same population. So after each Census, states and localities have to redraw their district lines to ensure that the districts are roughly equal. This process redrawing of district lines has been blamed for almost every problem in American politics. The redistricting process therefore became a target for political reformers. In 2008, Californians enacted Prop. 11 and created the Citizens Redistricting Commission (CRC). State legislators would no longer be able to pick their own…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This primary source document is from an article from Harper’s Weekly. Harper’s Weekly was a very important newspaper from New York during the Civil War. The article was titled “New York Legislation.” The proper bibliography citation for this source is: “New York Legislation.” Harper’s Weekly (New York), April, 8, 1865, 9th ed., sec. 432. Accessed September 12, 2016. http://www.sonofthesouth.net/leefoundation/civil-war/1865/April/amnesty.htm. The article clearly focuses on the New York legislation at the time. The author of the article is unclear. There is no given author for any of the article in this particular edition of the newspaper. However, the author’s purpose is clear. The point of this article is to highlight the issues that are concerning…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is like a game, call it the redistricting game. Gerrymandering is an act that tries to establish a political advantage for a particular party or group. Although the Supreme Court ruled gerrymandering unconstitutional in 1986, it could possibly challenge in court. To sum gerrymandering up in a sentence. The main purpose of redistricting is to allow fewer districts for a politician opponent. They take parts of a states that they feel like would think, communicate, have the same skin color or act like there opponent and the attempt to make as few districts including them as possible. Doing this gives that candidate a higher chance of getting votes of the people in other districts. Virginia is considered to be one of the most gerrymandered…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legislative Leader: The legislative leader is democratic, three crucial issues in the US is obesity, power outages, and unemployment. As the years go on, people are getting lazier and not wanting…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It also showed that party organizations are highly responsive to the contours of new redistricting plans, and they incorporate this information when deciding which candidates to support financially. In career legislatures, where constituency manipulation is central to redistricting strategy, party organizations focus on districts whose boundaries have been drastically reconfigured, while in springboard legislatures, money flows to districts whose partisan composition has changed significantly. This study is somewhat limited in that it focuses on the most highly observable outputs of party finance and redistricting: direct financial contributions and the physical geography of districts. Looking at the percentage of constituency change can also be a blunt instrument in analyzing the changes districts undergo during the redistricting…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each decade politicians become wound up for the political war of who will win the control of Congress for the next decade or possibly longer. One of the most effective ways of manipulating elections, shy of corruption, is gerrymandering. Gerrymandering (pronounced “garrey” mandering not “jerry” mandering) is the government’s advantage of one political party over another. It is the process of drawing weirdly shaped lines to define a district. The term is derived from Elbridge Gerry, who was one of the founding fathers, who drew a weirdly shaped district that resembles a salamander, it was henceforth dubbed gerrymandering. One of the unfortunate truths in American society and political life is that although we are told that each individual vote counts, the reality is that sometimes people’s votes are less equal. Political power in Congress is based upon population, the bigger the state is, for example California and Texas, the bigger the reward is of more seats in Congress, rather than Rhode Island or Delaware. The states with a higher population are appointed more seats and they get those seats from the states with fewer people that are counted from the census. The effervescent image of American democracy is that of a vibrant government that is open to change and subject to will of its voters, unfortunately this is an illusion. The problem with redrawing lines is that it eliminates the evaluation process that the public has by preventing competitive elections. I feel like it is just another loophole, oppressive scheme for political officials to try and dictate against us. Politicians seem to have the mutual feeling that it is a birth right for them to represent certain districts but we are still in a democracy, not a dictatorship or a monarchy, we have the right to elect who we feel represents our communities voice most appropriately and violating that right by eliminating the person we feel best suites us from our district it is violating our Constitutional and…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I understand why you are torn when comes to gerrymandering, but for me I don’t think it’s fair. As the the definition of gerrymandering it is “redistricting to benefit a particular group”. What I really don’t like about it, is states get divided the way the congress wants and it changes at every . Even if the states gets redistricting in a weird way and it doesn’t make sense by looking at the map, as long as the district ends up with equal population. I don’t think the way it’s proportioned to make sure that one party has a greater chance of getting elected is right. It’s like if you live there and you end up in a population that you don’t belong in, you may have to move. I don’t think I should have to move, just to belong in the same party…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After voters elect government officials to office, they are assigned districts to represent by their respective state. Every ten years, a census of the United States population is taken, and the boundaries are redrawn so that every district has approximately the same population to ensure equal voter representation and is not controlled by a major political party. It is important to draw the lines so that every community in a district is given the chance to voice their concerns and opinions. It is also important to make sure that the lines are not manipulated by a political party to gain political advantage - this is called gerrymandering. Gerrymandering gives control to a major political party and affects the issues that a government will look…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering has become a real issue in many states. “Gerrymandering is the process where the majority party draws an election district map with district boundary lines that give itself…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering allows for a particular party to get bills passed easily by having a majority of their party in The House of Representatives and Senate. With this increase they will have enough votes to make a bill veto proof. Political and racial gerrymandering are unconstitutional and illegal. As stated in, The voting rights act of 1965 “prohibits spreading minorities across districts”The court’s solution required that states create majority-minority districts — districts in which the majority of the voting-age population belonged to a single minority. With voting that occurred largely along racial lines, these districts allowed minority voters to elect their candidates of choice.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    These budget cuts will have a tremendous impact on New York City, and, of course, that includes my neighborhood. For this reason, I believe we need to work together as a neighborhood.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This will allow for all the bidget reforms to be done on a larger scale and avoid situations such as Illinois from every occurring again. IIn order to implement the the long term plan of increasing the Federal influence and limiting that of the State, we must first address and convince mainly the Supreme Court and republican States. Similarly to when the Supreme Court judged mandating the expansion of medicare as non constitutional and instead made it optional. For similar reasons, Republican States might appose this reform. However, one could argue that the current structure is also non constitutional as it has increased disparities and decreased parities in mental care. Additionally, the constitution states “ensure domestic Tranquility,” and many studies suggest a strong correlation between violence and mental health (CITE), Meaning, the current structure appear actually go against the constitutions. In terms of parties that approve this reformation we have several advocacy groups such as the National Alliance on Mental Illnesses, the Substance Abuse and mental Health Services Administrations as well as other politicians such as Micheal Gelder, Senior Advisor at the Illinois Department of Public Health and Mayoral challenger Jesus “Chuy” Garcia. Garcia commended Gov Rauners “draconian cuts” and called for the cuts to be mediated. If these supporters put their full combined effort together, a change may finally be implemented to further develop an effective comprehensive mental…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Managment Process

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Lewis, P. (2007). Managment challengers for tommorrow 's leaders. (5e ed., pp. 39-42 ,90-92). Mason, Ohio: Tomson South-Western.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays