America's favorite past time

Nicholas Saviano All hail big government, provider of all.

For my assignment I would like to go over why the newly formed Affordable healthcare bill is both inversely named and unconstitutional. When I say inversely, I mean that the healthcare bill is anything but affordable, and I mean to prove my statements with some basic economics even a five year old could comprehend but seem to elude the grasp of the vary masterminds that spirited this bill though our system.

First I would like to explain why this bill should never have been implemented in the first place; there are many complex examples so I will only go over a select few. First point, the court majority stated that the bill could only be up held through the congress’s power to tax. This goes completely against Obama’s original theory that he repeated over, and over again to the public that the new healthcare bill was not a tax. It is not within congress’s power to require Americans, as a requirement to live in this country, to acquire a commodity, including health insurance.

Now make a mental note, Obamacare could only be upheld as a tax. Not saying it would be a legitimate tax but let’s entertain the notion. To be a lawful tax, Obamacare would have to follow all the constitution’s conditions for the imposition of taxes. Because Democrats bull headedly maintained that their independent achievement was not a tax, its legality as a tax has not been inspected. Ironically, because the affordable healthcare ratification was induced by fraud, “a massive plan to confiscate wealth, masquerading as ordinary legislation so the liberal party could pretend that the bill was indeed, not raising taxes” we can prove its illegitimacy. The chief justice attempted to rebrand the bill thus contributed to the fraud. We now know that Obamacare is a tax. Therefore, it was unquestionably a bill for raising revenue. This is but one