Preview

Always Outnumbered, Always Outgunned

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
690 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Always Outnumbered, Always Outgunned
In my opinion, a book is always a better choice for entertainment then a movie. Usually, when a book is adapted into a movie; the movie always seems to omit scenes and details mentioned in the book. This is the same with Walter Mosley’s Always Outnumbered, Always Outgunned; a novel that tells a story surrounding a man named Socrates Fortlow. However, while the movie version of Always Outnumbered, Always Outgunned follows the same concept as the book there are substantial differences in terms of events, details, and chronological order. The first major difference between the movie and the book is how quickly the movie reveals some of the flaws of the main character Socrates Fortlow. In fact the movie starts with Socrates appearing extremely anxious and worried as he lie tossing and turning in his bed; sweat glistening on his forehead, and flashbacks of the rape and double murder he committed playing in his head. By contrast, the book gets off to a much slower start and begins with Socrates wondering why Billy, the chicken that woke him up every day for the past eight years, hadn’t made a sound that morning. Socrates goes to the backyard to check on Billy and sees a young boy climbing off the fence across the alley with a box in his hand. Socrates hollers, “what you doin’ there, boy” (Mosley 13)? The young boy responds by saying, “What bizness is it to you, old man” (Mosley 13)? Suspicious of the young man the two continue to talk and then Socrates suddenly grabs the young boy by the neck, opens the box and finds Billy lying dead inside. Angry and upset Socrates forces the boy inside the house and has him pluck and cook the chicken for dinner. Once inside, the young boy tells Socrates his name is Darryl. Darryl cooks the chicken and when the meal is finished they eat and Darryl returns home. In the book, the reader does not find out about Socrates’ crime until much later. In the book, we learn that Darryl has killed a young retarded boy in Baldwin

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Why is it that when a book gets it’s own movie that there are several differences between the book and the movie? Some people argue that the book is always better than the movie. There is a reason for this. Firstly, in most book to movie adaptations small details are changed or are just not included. Secondly, the movie often takes short cuts and doesn’t touch on certain aspects that were described in the book. Lastly, when reading a book you are free to make your own subtext and fill in the blanks with your imagination. The movie adaptations of books have always lacked the detail that's in the book, some things are completely cut from the movie to maintain a well paced story, and it fills in the gaps for us making the experience less unique.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Davie Movie Vs Book

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think, hopefully along with you, the reader that books are greater than the movie, especially in this case. For some extra details, here are some good mentions. The book, produced in 1886, had more evidence that Alan had committed the Appin Murder than the movie! Also, the plot and timing of character scenes were off. One example was when Davie asked the woman in the book where the House of Shaws was, in the movie it was a man! Also, in the book, the woman had hatred for the House of Shaws, when in the movie he had no hatred that would of made the movie slightly more…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The differences are subtle, but they are all there. One difference between the two are the order of events. Certain scenes, such as Paul and Albert's injuries, the French girls and Paul's leave, are all done in different orders in both the movie and book. In the book, the scenes play out like this; first the boys meet the French girls, then Paul has his leave and then finally Paul and Albert get injured However, in the movie the events play out as so; The boys meet the French girls (n this particular sequence of events meeting the French girls happens first, however, in the movie that scene is shown later then in the book), then Paul and Albert get injured, and then finally Paul has his leave. This difference is very trivial as it doesn't change anything significantly, however it is a pretty striking…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The most prominent change in characters is the personality of Virgil Tibbs. “Instead of being stretched out on the bench, he was wide awake and sitting up straight as though he were expecting something to happen. His coat was off and laid neatly beside him. He had been reading a paperback book up to the moment Sam entered...” (Pg. 15) This is almost identical to the scene where we are introduced to Virgil in the movie. However, the quick-thinking, cold and intense version to be seen later on in the movie was very surprising. The humble, clever and cool homicide investigator from the novel is much preferred. His collected manners also make it all the more enjoyable when…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contemplate the fact that in the book, no women are present at the end of the novel, but in the film, women play a role in the reconstruction of the new society. Possibly, this difference reflects that the book was written in 1953, whereas the film was made 14 years later.…

    • 359 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many differences between the movie and the book. First the positive points: This film attaches faces to Scout, Jem, Miss Maudie, and Dill, since no description of their faces is given in the book. Also, the film has some genuinely hilarious moments, particularly the scene where Scout is dressed as a ham and walking through the forest. Another good point is that the acting was superb and a treat to watch. Gregory Peck, who played Atticus, was captivating. The film is cast very well. The novel does not give physical descriptions of Scout, Jem, Miss Maudie, and Dill, but the film characters were believable. The actors look like what we would expect them to look like.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both the movie and the book share a basic concept of showing an understanding of a story being told. The book does a more in depth explanation and a better job of narrating the story. John Knowles novel, A Separate Peace, is a story about a destructive and corrupt relationship between Finny and Gene who both attend Devon School around World War ll where most boys went off to fight in the army not realizing there was already a war created within themselves, hence the title, A Separate Peace. The book does a much more effective job of telling the story compared to the movie. In the novel, the story is being told from Gene's perspective whereas in the movie, it is being told from a third persons point of view. Also, Cliff…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Books and movies of books all have many similarities and differences. To Kill a Mockingbird is no different when it comes to the book and the movie. In this essay I will be explaining the similarities and differences between the two.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Take the ending for example, in the movie she had a fight scene with the main bad character in the movie. In the book she didn’t, she ended up having to fight her boyfriend, but not the bad character. In the movie she forced the woman to shut off the bad simulation people were in. In the book she did it herself; this changed the ending in many ways.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Two main differences exist between the movie and the novel. First, the book gives the reader more detail into Lester Burdon’s life. Lester’s father abandoned Lester and his family when Lester was a teenager. The movie mentions the abandonment, but provides no background. Lester also endured bullying as a child, and young man. The novel suggest these experiences in his youth led to some of the bad decisions made, first threatening the Colonel, and then kidnapping the Colonel and his family in order to force the Colonel into giving the house back to Kathy.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As you watch a movie, you can see a big difference between the movie and book. In the book and movie, “To kill a Mockingbird”, there is a difference between them. They are both different because the book has more details about situations that are happening. Also, because of the way you can picture what is going on. They are similar because in some parts in the movie, the characters say the same things as to when you read the book. In my opinion, the book gives you a better understanding of what the story is about because of the details it provides.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The physical setting of the story between the book and movie versions are different. In the book version the physical setting was in an law office on Wall Street in New York City, and Wall Street at the time when the story was written was where the capitalist ideals was best exemplified by show of big companies starting to dominate the national economy. In the movie version the physical setting was in a city…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One thing in particular that the book does much better is making use of complex metaphors and themes, such as: the river for life, and oneness with nature, that string themselves together as you turn each page of the book, while in the movie the metaphors and symbolism are represented in a much different way through picture. In the book, both themes regarding the river are very vivid and clear, as they use strong imagery of nature to draw pictures in the minds of the readers. In the movie both themes are represented and referred to much less because of the lack of narration.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The novel begins with the main character, Socrates Fortlow, going outside into the alley beside his home. Socrates is investigating why Billy, an old rooster Socrates considers his friend, is not crowing this morning. The sun is just coming up, and Socrates views the alley as almost pretty with the debris in the alley bathed in half-light. Socrates finds a boy, Darryl, standing in the alley with a cardboard box. The boy tries to run when Socrates confronts him, but Socrates stops him. Inside of the box is Billy. He is dead.…

    • 2261 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Outsiders

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the movie you could actually see what Tulsa, OK looked like because in the book you could picture a Slump, trailer, bad neighbor hood. But the house really wasn’t in as bad as shape as I thought it would be. The difference between the people was because you could see the difference on the street. Like who they were, how old, if they were a Greaser or a Soc. Although some people didn’t really show who they were. But in the book, you can see it, but not like picture it as well. It the movie makes it bolder because you see, hear, and almost feel what’s going on. You can actually see the people doing these things, on the other hand, in the book you can read it, but not feel it. You can also see their surroundings. What’s behind the scenes. Where they’re at, and wherever they’re at, you can tell which side of town. Both the book and the movie had great descriptions on what their side was like, Socs had it all, and Greasers had nothing. Like maybe the Greasers had old cars and the Socs had brand new cars.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics