Preview

Alexander III and the Preservation of Autocracy

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
540 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alexander III and the Preservation of Autocracy
AS History Homework
Determined to preserve the Autocracy, in what ways did Alexander III in fact lay the foundations for its destruction?
Alexander III struggled to keep his large multi-ethnic empire together, as a major change within Russia was expected of him after his late father Alexander II begun some reforms. He needed to maintain the complete power over Russia in order to preserve autocracy, while facing pressure from some of his advisers to reform the empire to make it more democratic, allowing an elective parliament to share political power with the Tsar. However Alexander III had made it clear that he did not approve of his father’s political changes, and when became the Tsar in 1881, he tossed Russia on a return to conservatism.
This decision was not approved by many opposition groups which started to form in the undergrounds of St. Petersburg. Those who wanted changes ranged from moderates to extremists. Moderates included liberals who believed in peaceful reforms and wanted to allow freedom of the speech and press. Extremists took many forms, mainly with one goal – destroying the tsarist system. All of these were being formed as people wanted more rights and had the common desire to change the political system in order to form a fair government. To Alexander III it was clear that these groups should be repressed and terminated.
Another factor that helped lay the foundations for the destruction of the Tsar was the industrial development. The person most related to the rapid industrialisation of the world’s biggest country in the 19th century was the Finance Minister, Sergei Witte. His aim was to make the Russian economy strong enough to maintain its position as a Great Power and expand the country’s business class, which was central to the development of the British and other European economies in the 1890’s. However, Russia did not possess certain factors which were essential for the success of the ‘Witte system’. The majority of the peasants

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Another thing that had changed in Alexander III’s reign to make Russia seem unrecognisable in 1894 compared with 1881 was that the idea of reform was strongly opposed by him so Russia appeared to moving backwards instead of forwards in all aspects. Alexander III introduced a Manifesto that stated that the Tsar would be in charge of all political power. It presented a very conservative Russia where political and social stability was to be controlled and supported by autocracy, Russian nationalism and the Russian Orthodox Church. This shows how Russia had changed to become recognisable in 1894 because any idea of a constitution was rejected by the Tsar and represented Conservative ideas in his decision making. Russia…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term "reaction" refers to a backward change and the term "reform" means to overhul the situation and change it, most of the time for the better. Alexander II also known as the liberator, was the Emperor of Russia from 1855 to 1881. He was responsible for reforms of the legal system, local goverment, armed forces and the emancipation of the serfs, which was the the most important reform in 1861. When Alexander the Liberator died in 1881 his second son became a Tsar. Alexander III or Alexander the Peacemaker was the Emperor of Russia from 1881 to 1894. Alexander III cracked down severely on reform and revolutionary groups, prompting growing unrest.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this time period the ruling elite, who made up 1.1% of the population despite owning 25% of the land, maintained constant support of the Tsar. This support was based on reliance in the Tsars rule in order to ensure their own aristocracy. The nobles controlled the land Therefore through the nobility’s control of land and as a result the means of production, the Tsar had autocratic power over the majority who worked this land; the peasants, both of state (32.7%) and through the nobility 50.7% as despite the emancipation of serfs in 1861 the lives of these peasants were heavily restricted and reliant on the land owners through the Mir, censorship, tax and redemption payments, of which many could not pay for and so were forced into debt. the peasants themselves, being both restricted in the Mir and due to their traditional attitudes and acceptance of social situation, what Marx would call a lack of revolutionary consciousness, can be attributed to the Tsarist survival.…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Traditionally it is assumed that he was a reactionary, unlike the reformer his father, Alexander II, had been. However, as so often the case, this interpretation of Alexander III’s rule is undisputed. There is much reason to believe that despite some different policies, ultimately both men wanted to reach the same goals. Alexander III unquestionably did undermine the reforming policies of his father, but the underlying reasons for this are not so obvious.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    leaders who came after him, Alexander manipulated art to create a god­like status for himself. In doing…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sergei Witte was the Minister of Finance in Russia in from 1892 to 1903. He desperately wanted to bring Russia, metaphorically, ‘out of the dark ages’ by bringing it up to speed, so that it would eventually reach a level of modernisation where it could go head to head with the advanced countries further west. He believed Russia first needed to attain capital investment in the industrial sector, increase urban workers (Proletariat), attract foreign trade and develop greater train links to ease the possibility of further foreign trade.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The year of 1866 can be seen to have been a turning point in the Tsar’s policies becoming more reactionary and reversing many of the changes his reforms had brought. The reforms had been put in place in an attempt to propel Russia out of its increasingly backward state; as much as reforms such as the emancipation of the serfs, greater freedoms and opportunities in education and relaxation of censorship occurred with good intentions, much opposition arose. This came alongside the Tsar’s own personal problems, accompanied by increasing pressure from both events of the time and individuals.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As King, Alexander undertook his father’s tactics. He wanted to show everyone he was just as great of a leader that his father was. SIn 334 BC, he pursued one of many measures his father had…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far was Tsar Nicholas responsible for his own downfall? In 15th March 1927 Tsar Nicholas of Russia abdicated in this essay I will be analysing to what extent it was his fault and what extent he had no control over His mistakes…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The general assumption of Alexander the Great is that he was a conqueror and was in charge of the destruction of the Persian Empire. This leader and achiever succeeded in plenty other aspects to create the conqueror he became over time. Thus, Alexander the Great was an average youthful child who was born in Pella, Macedonia where he later became emperor. The support from other scholars has helped prove the importance of him and his conquests.…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    No one was prepared for Alexander’s death; a weak succession, following other complications, arose after his passing. His loyal Macedonian generals wanted to preserve the Macedonian Empire, so they appointed themselves governors of the various provinces in the empire. This led to one major consequence of Alexander’s death, which was the weak governmental succession that followed. The governors were very ambitious, strong-willed men who had conflicting views. These conflicting views led to warfare, which in turn led to the execution or murder of all direct members in the Macedonian royal house. Another major consequence was the unequal distribution of the prosperity of the Macedonian Empire. The urban Greeks, the Macedonians, and the Hellenized…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Great men have lived on the face of the earth and left marks of their prowess and legacy that men of the present and even the future find it hard to emulate; a good example of such men is Alexander the Great. This paper seeks to explain further Alexander’s military genius and its positive impact on military impact over the past centuries. The paper also gives a well thought analysis why Alexander was so much successful in his wars and conquests. His big empire spread all the way from Gibraltar to the Punjab and in his leadership made Greek the lingua franca of his new World (Cary, M, 1932).…

    • 2405 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sergei Witte’s industrialisation policies played a big role in increasing opposition towards the government, mainly within the peasants and the proletariat. Witte’s intentions were to raise the capital needed to fund industry and the building of…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Borza, Eugene . "Battle of Gaugamela." Houghton Mifflin Company (1996): NA. Web. 19 Mar 2011…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the great was born in July 356 B.C. to his father Phillip II. Alexander’s father prepared him for a life a conquests and legacies by allowing young Alexander to take over the battle of Chaeronea. This was a very important battle for Alexander since it showed his leadership skills considering he was only 16 years old. After the battle of Chaeronea, Alexander’s father, Phillip II, was assassinated. Now a new ruler at the age of twenty would emerge to the Macedonia people, he was know as Alexander the Great. Alexander the Great conquered many battles leading to the outstanding legacy of his empire.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics